Spongebobguy266666
December 2019
edit
Hello, I'm Mz7. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to YouTube Rewind—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Mz7 (talk) 03:48, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
January 2020
edit Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge on the Run, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 18:06, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spider-Man 2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 18:09, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
edit Hello, I'm Prestonmag. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Michael Bloomberg have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Prestonmag (talk) 22:36, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Children's Online Privacy Protection Act was changed by Spongebobguy266666 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857692 on 2020-02-01T23:02:01+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Common Sense Media, you may be blocked from editing. Crboyer (talk) 17:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Bloomberg. Materialscientist (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MelanieN (talk) 03:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)