Stefiro
Welcome!
edit
|
February 2012
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Beppe Costa has been reverted.
Your edit here to Beppe Costa was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://pellicanolibri.altervista.org) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:09, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Ottobre in Poesia
editThanks for including the titles with the URL links, but they continue to be bare links. With time, websites with information may retitled and that URL may not work. That is why it's helpful to add more information on that URL, Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline citations may help.
Example for newspaper articles: <ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/17/world/asia/north-korea-satellite-launch-missile-test.html?_r=1&ref=world|title=North Korea Says It Will Launch Satellite Into Orbit|author=Choe Sang Hunm, Steven Lee Myers|publisher=''[[New York Times]]''|date=March 16, 2012}}</ref>. SwisterTwister talk 03:28, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
editHi. When you recently edited Arnoldo Foà, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chéri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 4
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ottobre in Poesia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carbonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Moaen Shalabia for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moaen Shalabia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moaen Shalabia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TallGuysFree (talk) 04:26, 5 October 2017 (UTC)