Instructions for linking

edit

... will be found here. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

May 2009

edit

  When adding links to material on an external site, as you did to Blood: The Last Vampire, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

  • If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
  • If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:24.86.103.169, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Blanking another user's talk page is vandalism. Drmies (talk) 05:03, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

biog assessment

edit

Yes i assessed them. Ibids aren't allowed because on wikipedia people can add content which would mean they got out of sequence. This statement could be backed by a reference.[1] Someone could add in this sentence with a reference which would mean the following ibid in the next sentence did not refer to the first sentence.[2] Then this statement could be backed by same reference.[3]

  1. ^ First ref
  2. ^ intervening reference
  3. ^ ibid

Tom B (talk) 11:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

yes, i updated all the projects with same assessment Tom B (talk) 09:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Bassethoundingits.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bassethoundingits.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —teb728 t c 00:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I left you a somewhat better explanation of what is wrong with the image at Wikipedia:Help desk#Uploading a Biography Picture. —teb728 t c 04:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Film studies book?

edit

Hey, I see that you have not edited in quite some time, but in the off-chance that you're still logged in and see this, I was wondering about a quotation from Mamoru Oshii that you added here. It's referenced to a film studies textbook that I don't have access to—if you still have access to it, I would be interested to know what the full passage says in the interest of checking that quotation. Thanks! Sandtalon (talk) 11:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply