User talk:StudiesWorld/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:StudiesWorld. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge | |
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. | |
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing!
|
The Signpost: 01 January 2014
- Traffic report: A year stuck in traffic
- Arbitration report: Examining the Committee's year
- In the media: Does Wikipedia need a medical disclaimer?
- Book review: Common Knowledge: An Ethnography of Wikipedia
- News and notes: The year in review
- Discussion report: Article incubator, dates and fractions, medical disclaimer
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Fifth Edition
- Featured content: 2013—the trends
- Technology report: Looking back on 2013
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:40, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 January 2014
- Public Domain Day: Why the year 2019 is so significant
- Traffic report: Tragedy and television
- Technology report: Gearing up for the Architecture Summit
- News and notes: WMF employee forced out over "paid advocacy editing"
- WikiProject report: Jumping into the television universe
- Featured content: A portal to the wonderful world of technology
Speedy deletion declined: Villaverde Bajo railway station
Hello StudiesWorld. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Villaverde Bajo railway station, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to train stations. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 14:31, 11 January 2014 (UTC) @Malik Shabazz:
- What would apply? StudiesWorld (talk) 15:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure the article qualifies for speedy deletion. Why don't you try PROD? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 15:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, I will later today! StudiesWorld (talk) 15:14, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure the article qualifies for speedy deletion. Why don't you try PROD? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 15:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Villaverde Bajo-Cruce (Madrid Metro) Nominated For Deletion
Hello. I was wondering why Villaverde Bajo-Cruce (Madrid Metro) has been nominated for deletion? The reason why I think this page is fine to stay is because a lot of stations in the UK & USA already have their own separate pages and A few months ago I decided to give the Madrid Metro the treatment. Now as you might have seen so far I have only added pages to the stations itself along with information on their respective lines and zones. Hopefully in the next few months more information will be added to all of the pages. I have also updated Villaverde Bajo-Cruce (Madrid Metro) slightly since the page was nominated. Hope you understand :) Thanks :) --MKY661 (talk) 17:14, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- @MKY661: You don't have enough references to prove its notability, yet. StudiesWorld (talk) 17:18, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- OK :) One was added a few monent's ago :) I'll go peek for a few more :) --MKY661 (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Sulphur Springs, TN
I just saw that you tagged and reviewed the article. Lead to short? What? there are articles that have shorter leads than this one. and relies on references to primary sources, What? all community articles use GNIS as the main reference. --ACase0000 (talk) 17:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- @ACase0000: Ok leads long enough. It is the ONLY source. If you disagree with me remove the tags. StudiesWorld (talk) 17:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- I am not being rude or anything i was just saying. And Thank you for tagging it the way you think is right. Have a Great Day!! --ACase0000 (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- @ACase0000: I looked back at it and changed the tagging. StudiesWorld (talk) 17:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- I am not being rude or anything i was just saying. And Thank you for tagging it the way you think is right. Have a Great Day!! --ACase0000 (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:StudiesWorld. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |