Subwayfan1998

Welcome!

Hello, Subwayfan1998, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  – bradv🍁 02:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 02:46, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Anti-islam

Please be careful when applying those categories to living people. For Eric Allen Bell, for instance, that sourcing is pretty weak: anti-mosque is not the same as islamophobic. Please beware of special sanctions for BLP violations. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 03:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

October 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Do not add POV and unsourced categories Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:Anti-Muslim sentiment

Please see the category description that I have added, per related pages: it must not include articles about individuals, groups or media that are allegedly anti-Muslim. Personally, I don't think the category needs to be there, but I appreciate it survived a deletion discussion. But please consider removing all the articles (especially the BLPs) that don't belong - I have made a start, but there are lots more to do. StAnselm (talk) 09:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Agreed. I have removed a few more as well. Emeraude (talk) 10:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Ok, But these figures openly spread inflammatory remarks against Muslims by calling them Rapists, Murderers, Misogynists, Sexists, Homophobes, Terrorists and etc.

The category is warranted ONLY if reliable sources warrant it. And why didn't you respond to my comment in the first place? Does it take three editors commenting here before you listen? StAnselm, are there a lot of really inappropriate ones? Subwayfan, you run a risk here of being disruptive and violating the BLP--to the point where editors/administrators might be tempted to revert ALL your edits with a press of the button. Drmies (talk) 20:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I think they're almost all inappropriate. Instead, the articles should be in "Opposition to Islam" categories. StAnselm (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

• HEY. Stop right now or I will block you. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 20:41, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Why, You Want to Block and I'm doing in fact because they want to Ban a Religion in America.

Thank You, StAnselm

• Good, you stopped. Now continue stopping until this is cleared up. StAnselm, I don't know much about this particular category or the other, but what I see is four editors objecting to these category edits here, and User:PCock reverting another one--no doubt there are many more. Drmies (talk) 20:48, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:Christian fundamentalists

Please do not add people to Category:Christian fundamentalists without a reliable source. It refers to a particular theological stance, not just to a particular stance on a given issue. StAnselm (talk) 20:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

ok

• User:StAnselm, you need to help figure out where we go from here. I don't want to hit mass rollback, but maybe we should. Do you mind posting on ANI to get some more input? And ping the people who have commented here, and maybe some of the editors who reverted? Thanks, Drmies (talk) 21:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't get involved with ANI if I can help it. StAnselm (talk) 03:00, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Well, that's not helpful. Drmies (talk) 01:57, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Chechen collaborators with Nazi Germany

A tag has been placed on Category:Chechen collaborators with Nazi Germany indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Russian collaborators with Nazi Germany

You are adding redundant Categories. The Russian collaborators with Nazi Germany category already incorporates the Russian Liberation Army personnel and the Executed Russian collaborators with Nazi Germany categories. Maybe you need to stop blindly reverting. Catlemur (talk) 17:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

June 2024

Hello, I'm Notwally. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Mike Lee, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! – notwally (talk) 07:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

@Subwayfan1998 The category associated with Anti-Ukrainian sentiment was applied across multiple BLPs without supporting citation. Setting aside that the aforementioned category is about Xenophobia and cultural biases, the BLPs it was applied to have publicly expressed, with regards to Ukraine, an anti-war sentiment -- at best. Additionally, other articles had controversial cats applied that could be argued fall into the MOS:LABEL category and shouldn't be added without supporting arguments or citations. Repeated incidents of Empty edit summaries, misuse of minor edit tags, and controversial labels could be considered WP:NPOV or at worse, WP:TENDENTIOUS editing. (note, I'm WP:AGF here and not accusing you of anything). Please do not reintroduce any of these reverts without gaining affirmative consensus on their respective talk pages. Kcmastrpc (talk) 14:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)