Z Experimental Station

edit

Summerdrought,

I have let User:Specopsaust know that the Z Experimental Station needs references and to improve that page. Are you able to help with it as well. I've only got 1 week left before I go on holidays. But I will have access to the Internet. Adamdaley (talk) 09:32, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your reply on my talkpage about the above message. I am also able to help with a reference or two, possibly add little extra information about Z Experimental Station. My additions to the article will be after I come back on July 13th. Give me a day to recover from the flights, and we'll see if we can improve the article. I appreciate your help and feedback. Regards Adamdaley (talk) 23:55, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join the Military history project

edit

You may also be interested in one of the project's task forces: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

AustralianRupert, Many thanks for your invitation to join the above mentioned Projects, I appreciate your offer. I am however about to set off on an outback trek for a few months, and therefore will be unable to participate. Regards,Summerdrought (talk) 06:49, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
No worries, sounds like fun. The project is ongoing, though, so when you get back if you are keen it will still be there. Anyway, take care. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply


Veevers Vandalism

edit

For some reason I was looking through the edit history and came upon a deliberate change of Veevers working in the area in 1950s, to the 1980s! Have a look at either side of the "Revision as of 03:00, 1 June 2009" and you will see that an IP editor made that change. Further research this morning has led me to understand that there are few impact craters with meteoritic material still associated with them; but I do wonder how big a dimple has to be before it is called a crater. I was surprised to find that Acraman, in the north of the Eyre Peninsula, has chondrite associated with it. It is huge, and believe it or not, I figured out for myself that it was a crater, simply because of the circular manner in which the roads run around it. When the kids were little and we were heading for Coffin Bay, we had a choice of either the east road or the west road - while studying the map I began speculating that the circular structure we were driving around was a crater.=Greg Winterflood (talk) 00:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC) Summerdrought (talk) 08:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Huckitta, Arkete, Argadargada

edit

I have it on good authority that Argadargada refers to the end point, or run out of the Sandover. So it appears that Huckitta, Arkete, and Argadargada might all have the same meaning. The good authority only amounts to "the locals told me" so I'll have to dig a little deeper.Greg Winterflood (talk) 05:15, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Meetup in North Queensland

edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to the first meetup in Townsville on Saturday 21 April. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Townsville. There is also the possibility of having a meetup in Ingham or Cairns which I have mentioned at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Townsville. Let us know if you are interested. John Vandenberg (chat) 04:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anne Beadell Highway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woomera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fixed.Summerdrought (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Sandy Blight Junction Road, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Puffin Let's talk! 10:58, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Australian Roads

edit

Hi Summerdrought,

I notice that you have recently created and edited Australian road articles, such as Sandy Blight Junction Road. I have recently started up a new project for Australian roads, with the goal of improving Wikipedia's coverage of Australian roads – currently the vast majority of articles are stub or start class. The project pages are located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads, if you want to take a moment to look around, and join up if you're interested. Thanks, Evad37 (talk) 05:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Evad37, I don't mind the odd cryptic crossword, therefore my guess is you are 40 and the name is Dave. Please accept my apologies if I am wrong, but I did enjoy browsing the red herrings on your user page. My username is not all that original, and a sleuth would have no trouble in tracking me down, so there's a challenge for you. Now to the subject. After much consideration I have decided to sit on the sidelines at this stage, as I doubt that I would be able to devote sufficient time to the project. We travel a lot, and I am not equipped with mobile stuff if you get my drift. So thanks anyway. I am willing to help out without being a formal member if there is any thing you would like me to look at. Keep up the good work.Summerdrought (talk) 04:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
  No problem, however and whenever you choose to help out is fine (by the way, you are only half-right about my username) - Evad37 (talk) 04:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
What! are you 80?
No, that's getting colder - Evad37 (talk) 05:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gunbarrel Road Construction Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dick Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, fixed Summerdrought (talk) 21:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Woomera Test Range

edit

Hello Summerdrought, First attempt at a reply so we will see how I go with it. Many thanks for your recent suggestions. Regarding your last message as follows:

"Hi Charliebarsby. Thank you for your recent additions to the Woomera articles, which are welcome. May I recommend that you have a look at the Wikipedia:Manual of Style for assistance with the layout and style of wording for the encyclopedia. Information which is added to an article's main page needs to have verifiable inline references cited, usually meaning that the information comes from a published source. Wikipedia does not condone personal research as a verifiable source. Presently, the Woomera articles have insufficient verifiable citations, and would be greatly improved by their addition if you have access to some. Many thanks. Summerdrought (talk) 22:36, 20 May 2013 (UTC)"

I have had a quick look at the Wikipedia:Manual of Style and it is a comprehensive section; is there something in particular that you wish me to study?

OK on the "Personal Research" being unacceptable as a reference. I have used Fire Across the Desert, also Files and Site Plans viewed in the Adelaide Office of the National Archives of Australia generally as reference material. If you could be specific I will expand on the references for the particular entries of concern. I worked on the Range for the best part of 30 years and have hands on experience with some of the items that I have entered. My wife worked on the ELDO Project for 1966 to 1970.


Kind regards Charliebarsby — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charliebarsby (talkcontribs) 02:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Charliebarsby, your experience at Woomera could be invaluable in fixing up the articles about Woomera. The article Woomera, South Australia needs much more in the way of verifiable references, for example there are no references at all in the Introduction and Overview sections, and the first appears in the Establishment subsection of History. It seems that P. Mortons "Fire across the desert" would be a very good reference, but nowhere in the article is its ISBN number quoted so that readers can verify that it is a legitimate source. I suggest you look at Wikipedia:Citing sources as the main reference for the method of doing this. Also, looking how other editors have gone about it always helps. In-line references can be tricky until you have done a few. I hope you find this reply helpful, regards, Summerdrought (talk) 02:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Summerdrought, Thank you for these tips which I will follow up in due course. My opinion on first reading some articles related to Woomera is that they are RAAF biased and lacking in detail on what preceded the RAAF take over. Hence my interest in adding a bit more information to reflect more accurately what has occured in the past.

The ISBN for Fire Across the Desert is ISBN 0 644 06068 9 Commonwealth of Australia 1989. Apart from the files in the Defence and National Archives it is the best written reference available.

I like your portrait of LB. I have seen that picture somewhere in one of my books but can't place it at present. I have all of his books signed by the author. Kind regards, Charliebarsby (talk) 09:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello again Charliebarsby, I am green with envy that you have signed copies of LB's books! I have paperback versions of his books, except for "Around the World in 80 Delays". If you have a paperback copy of his "Bush" series, there is a small (35x45mm) image of him on the back cover, which is what I used as a guide for the pencil drawing. My focus recently has been writing new articles about his roads, which had not yet been covered. It is still a work in progress. I concur with your comments regarding RAAF bias in the Woomera related articles, something which you might be able to re-balance in due course. I travelled the Anne Beadell Highway in 2007, some of the Connie Sue, the Gary Junction Road, Sandy Blight Junction Road and part of the Gary Hwy since then. Hope to do more in future. Please keep going with the Woomera articles, I am sure they can be improved. cheers, Summerdrought (talk) 10:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Good Morning Summerdrought, Thank you for the tip on the Talk page. I have created a Talk page this morning. OK on the photograph, it is on the back of four of the "Bush" series books. Do you have the book Len Beadell's Legacy by Ian Bayly ISBN 9781921496028? It is a reasonable reference although there are some errors of fact and he is obviously inclined towards the aborigines. He doesn't appreciate the fact that if LB's roads had not been constructed that many of the Communities would not exist as they were developed after the roads were constructed. I know Len's family and for several years before her death I had been in contact with his wife Anne on numerous occasions. She gave me copies of selected portions of his diaries however these were given in confidence and I would not pass them on to third parties. I would be prepared to share information with you if I can be of assistance although my main interest is the period 1946 - 1956.

My aim has been to correct works that have been writtem about him which are not factual. I have recently written an article that was published in the Austalian Sapper Magazine (an annual publication) regarding the so-called "Beadell Rescue". This incident happened in mid 1956 about half way between Mount Davies (north-west corner of SA) and Emu. The original short article was writen by Major Dennis Magee who was in charge of work conducted by the Royal Australian Engineers at Maralinga early in the project.

The only roads that I have travelled are Watson-Maralinga-EMU-Mabel Creek, Watson-Maralinga-Oak Valley-Volk's Hill Corner-Emu-Mabel Creek and also Dingo Claypan-300 mile peg and down to the Anne Beadell Highway. Plenty of bush bashing north of Emu looking for suitable areas for projects. Observatory Hill and Aboriginal Stone Henge were highlights during my travels

For reasons known only to themselves LB is not appreciated in the Royal Australian Survey Corps "clique". It is the best example of Tall Poppy Syndrome that I he ever encountered.

I see that you mention that you are located in Cairns. How long have you lived in the area? I was born and educated at Gordonvale and left there to join the Army at age 17. I always say that I left up there before they started selling the place to the Japanese! Regards Charliebarsby (talk) 00:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you.

edit
  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Dear Summerdrought; Thank you for reverting the vandalism perpetrated in Douglas Mawson's article on 27 November 2013. With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee. (talk) 10:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re: Canning Stock Route

edit

Hi Graham, before today I'd never actually edited the Canning Stock Route article, but I've taken a bash at it anyway. Hope you like it. As for the image, I refuse to deal with images because I can't see them (see my user page), but you can nominate it at files for deletion if you feel like it. How did you find me – was it the name? :-) Your username rings a bell for me, but I can't figure out exactly why. Graham87 03:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Over-doing it, I suspect that getting variants and styles is now enough for gaynor. Clearly self advertising and blockable. It might be worth encouraging in your gentle way, but the photo as a self promotion item was uploaded months ago. I suspect the user knew what they were doing, and rorting the system for the time possible. I would have no hesitation in requesting a block if she returned without taking heed of the warnings on the talk page satusuro 02:08, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

A Tesla Roadster for you!

edit
  A Tesla Roadster for you!
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 13:27, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank You!

edit

Just wanted to say thank you so much for giving me my very first Barn Star. I know its only a little thing, but its put a great big smile on my face this morning! Lucyloo10 (talk) 08:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Musgrave Ranges, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Gosse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Rhyothemis braganza

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rhyothemis braganza, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.igoterra.com/artspec.asp?thingid=74066.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:51, 25 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

The bot is confused, [1] has copied my article.

Rhyothemis graphiptera

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rhyothemis graphiptera, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.igoterra.com/artspec.asp?thingid=74067.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

As usual, the bot is confused. The quoted website has copied my new article.Summerdrought (talk) 23:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nannodiplax rubra

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nannodiplax rubra, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.igoterra.com/artspec.asp?thingid=74043.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

A usual, the bot is confused !!!!!!! Summerdrought (talk) 23:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Flying by with a fly-by

edit

I don't think I'd characterize "flyby" as "American" usage so much as a manifestation of Americans not knowing how to hyphenate compound adjectives and verbs any more because... oh, I won't get started on that issue! I think "flyby" is not dead-on incorrect, but definitely suboptimal, and would go with the OED "fly-by" myself under the circumstances. I have a distinct recollection of coming upon this issue in the past (although, apparently, according to the article history, not on Jupiter) and it isn't out of the question that I may have rolled my eyes and "compromised" with "flyby" in the name of intra-article consistency and at least eliminating glaring horrors like "the spacecraft made its final fly by of Mercury on 30 April 2015". (I tend to do a good bit of copy-nitpicking with the mobile app at 2 a.m. [insomnia relief; eh, it beats Candy Crush] and while I try to avoid getting mired in long articles under circumstances when keeping written style notes isn't practical, alas, it happens, and I try to finish the surgery as inoffensively as I can lest I zonk out asleep with an editing window open.) Good luck! Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Maps

edit

I love those maps you are adding to articles. What kind of software are you using to produce them (if it's not a trade secret)? Kerry (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi Kerry, no secret, I use Inkscape a free download on the Web. There is an article on Wikipedia about it. Thank you for your comments regarding my maps, I have a few more in the pipeline; next to come is the Kennedy Highway. Love your work, by the way! -- Summerdrought (talk) 05:59, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year Summerdrought!

edit

Dear Summerdrought,  
I hope all is well with you, and I wish you a great New Year in 2016!
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 18:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Peninsula Developmental Road

edit

I think you might be being a bit too vigilant here given this is a new user and WP:NOBITE applies. I think reaching out and talking to them about how to improve what they are doing might help a bit. They seem to be acting in good faith and I suspect they are a TMR employee who knows all about the road, but struggling with policies, processes, licensing etc. As someone who does Wikipedia training, I know new users find it all very bewildering. And, importantly, new users are unlikely to read an article Talk page nor look at the edit summaries in the History (they just don't yet know about them). So you probably need to write on their User Talk as that is your best chance of reaching them because they get the "You have new messages banner". At the moment they probably have no idea why their contributions are being deleted and probably getting rather angry and frustrated by it all. Kerry (talk) 00:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your sage advice Kerry, you are right. Regarding your training experience with Wikipedia, I would be more than happy if you would leave the suggested message for TMR CYRP. Regards, Summerdrought (talk) 01:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lake Macdonald

edit

Thanks for identifying that incorrect link. I have now changed the redirect to a disambig page, and redone the link in the article so it directs to the correct place. hamiltonstone (talk) 07:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Geography Barnstar
Dear Graham,  
Thank you very much for enriching our encyclopedia with all those beautiful maps (71 to date!) that you created and donated to the project since 7 January 2016. It must take you quite some time, effort and meticulous concentration to produce each of these maps and the present award is therefore richly deserved. I hope you will continue to enjoy adding more of your wonderful maps for the benefit of our encyclopedia.
Thank you once again, Graham, for a job very well done!  
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 10:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lake Amadeus

edit

Thanks for catching that. I guess I confused myself. Gab4gab (talk) 00:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Photo request

edit

Hi, Summerdrought! As you mention you live in Cairns, I was wondering if you might be able to help me with a photo for Commons. I have just written the article Edward Albert Koch (a doctor in Cairns who died in 1901 having figured out the connection between mosquitos and malaria) and there appears to be no photo I can find of him. However, there was a memorial built to him, now located in Anzac Memorial Park (corner of Abott and Spence Street) (see map) which has "on two sides of the dome are sculptured likenesses in Carrara marble of Dr Koch" and when you look closely at this photo of the memorial you can see there is a carving of a man's face. So I was wondering if a close-up photo of this carving might be good enough to be used to illustrate his article. I am guessing the carving on the monument is probably the source of the image on the Dr Koch foundation website. Anyway, if you are in a position to help with this, many thanks in advance. Kerry (talk) 00:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kerry, A very interesting article it is too. I will be pleased to take a look at the memorial and assess the feasibility of taking a photo. No doubt the time of day for a good shot with regard to shadows will need to be taken into account, so I will let you know the outcome. Cheers Summerdrought (talk) 22:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for that! Kerry (talk) 23:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Some baklava for you!

edit
  Dear Graham,  

Thank you very much for taking the time to visit my guestbook and for adding your friendly message! It's very nice to know you too, and thanks once again for all your great maps!
I hope you like Baklava? It's sticky and nutty and dripping with honey and therefore somewhat counter-indicated for our ol' cardio-vascular systems but, hey, we're all going in the same direction and we might just as well, therefore, enjoy the ride while it lasts, don't you think?  
Please keep well and joyful, Graham.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 08:42, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Summerdrought. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Technical Barnstar
Hi Summerdrought, Thank you for your contributions of all those maps. I also love your portrait by the way (a favourite past-time of mine).

Would you consider allowing me to use your map of the Northern Territory in a book for Foster Children to help identify where their families are from? I can send you a copy pre-printing for your reference.

I would like to acknowledge you as the source but am unsure how to do so beyond identifying you by your Wikipedia Username.

Looking forward to hearing from you,

Kind Regards,

Katherine Starshinebrightsky (talk) 06:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Katherine, many thanks for the barnstar, much appreciated. By all means feel free to make use of my map, I am glad that it will be used for something beneficial. I am happy if you use my first name 'Graham' as the attribution. Summerdrought (talk) 07:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thomson Developmental Road

edit

Hi Graham, Your query prompted me to do a little further research. As a result I have modified the entry for Thomson DR in the RJL of Landsborough Highway (with an Ozroads reference) I have also added State Route 14 (as per Google maps) to the List of road routes in Queensland. I love your maps, and have not noticed any errors to date. While on this subject, I recently left the following message on Talk:Irrigation Way: "One of the wonderful maps that show the subject road in a distinctive colour would be great for this article." Cheers, John. Downsize43 (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

John, Many thanks for your response, I will continue with my page on Thomson Developmental Road when time permits. I will also add the Irrigation Way to my list of things to do, as your suggestion has merit. Your extensive work on road articles is very much appreciated too.
Cheers, Graham Summerdrought (talk) 03:10, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Having just done the RJL for Moonie Highway, I believe your map should show the western end as the intersection with the Carnarvon Highway, not in the centre of St George. Cheers, John. Downsize43 (talk) 11:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Fixed Summerdrought (talk) 23:39, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, but it has'nt made it to the article yet. Downsize43 (talk) 09:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Moonie Highway

edit

Hi Graham,

  • 1. I can see the updated map on my PC (in Win Explorer) but I can only get the old one on my iPad (in Safari). Any ideas why this is?
  • 2. I have had the following feedback on your map from user Scott Davis:

"I'd also like to see the map show all of the cross-routes mentioned in the text (probably with smaller route symbols than the ones on it now)."

Hi John, (1) You will need to clear the Safari cache on your iPad, as the old version is being displayed. This occurs because there has been no file name change with the updated image. (2) I am happy to add the cross routes as suggested by Scott Davis, but it may be a week or more before I get a chance.
Cheers, Graham Summerdrought (talk) 00:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hi Graham. Thank you for that. When you revisit that map, could you please also check the Surat Development Road? The line on your map east of Surat doesn't seem to go to the same place as the line on the external maps linked from de:Surat Developmental Road. I am not familiar enough with that part of Australia to have any idea which (if either) is "right". I intend to learn to make maps for myself sometime if I find a pile of "free time". Cheers. --Scott Davis Talk 12:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hi Scott. You are correct, there is an error in my map with regard to roads in the Surat area, and I have already begun work on fixing it. I am also in the process of getting an article going for the Surat Developmental Road. I am hoping to get the results "live" by early next week. Thanks for your comments.Summerdrought (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Excellent. Thank you. Keep up the good work ;-) --Scott Davis Talk 01:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Northern Territory roads

edit

I have put a junction and locality table on Plenty Highway tonight too. My sources were Google Maps and the article itself (including the map). As you appear to be somewhat more local than I am, please let me know and/or fix anything I got wrong or misleading. Cheers. --Scott Davis Talk 12:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

When you are next thinking about the Gunbarrel Highway, could you please check the link in Yulara, Northern Territory and either cite or correct it? I think it may be consistent with what I was told by a tourist operator 15-20 years ago, but not with much else. --Scott Davis Talk 13:39, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Scott, I have added Camooweal as the main destination of the Sandover Hwy, otherwise the junction list looks good. I presume you are using google maps for the distances, which seem to come up a bit shorter than Hema maps, but are probably close enough. I have deleted the Gunbarrel Highway from the Yulara article, as it was incorrect. I have noted though that the Great Central Road is also named Tjukaruru Road on my 2007 edition Hema maps. I must admit though, that when I last travelled that road in 2015 (from Giles to Ayers Rock), I did not take much notice of the road signage. At that stage the Great Central Road had not seen a grader on the Northern Territory side for four years, and was in the worst condition of any major road I have ever been on! Cheers. Summerdrought (talk) 23:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Yes, Google Maps was me reference for distances. I think the link on the Plenty Highway reference even includes the waypoints. My impression is that the NT calls the road from Yulara to Docker River "Tjukaruru Road" and Western Australia calls the road from there to Laverton the "Great Central Road". I often find just thinking about what I read helps me to improve the things I know something about, and that triggers others to add what the have found too. The latest thing I noticed is should the (Old?) Gunbarrel Highway also appear near the top of the map of the Anne Beadell Highway. --Scott Davis Talk 07:54, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

5000 articles project

edit

Have you seen the Australian 5000 article challenge? You might like to add Mount Beadell to it in your name. Well done. I'm not sure if you have recently created or significantly expanded any other articles to add as well? --Scott Davis Talk 11:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Scott, Thank you for alerting me to the 5000 Challenge which I was not aware of. I will take a look at the concept. Regarding the map of the Anne Beadell Highway referred to above, you have a good point. I cannot recall why I did not include the part of it which should be visible, so I shall make that my next task. Regards, Graham. Summerdrought (talk) 20:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Tetrathemis irregularis cladophila) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Tetrathemis irregularis cladophila, Summerdrought!

Wikipedia editor Dps04 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for this article.

To reply, leave a comment on Dps04's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Dps04 (talk) 12:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harpobittacus australis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

fixed Summerdrought (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Moving on from stubs

edit

Hi Graham. I've started assessing our dragonfly pages to see whether they really are stubs or are something more. So, I figure if there is much more than the basic what-where-how, then the stub template can go. Your images and descriptions are a good example of additions that have moved a dragonfly page beyond the stub. What do you think? John Tann (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi John, your note has prompted me to read the assessment guidelines again (wp:assess), and I agree that some of our pages have gone beyond stub class. The textual description of "start class" in the guidelines is certainly met by our expanded pages. Keep up the good work! Summerdrought (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Lampromicra) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Lampromicra, Summerdrought!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Make sure your references accurately describe the source (WP:CITEHOW): here Biodiversity Heritage Library is merely the site hosting the source "Catalogue of the Hemiptera (Heteroptera)...".

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 05:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Harpobittacus australis) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Harpobittacus australis, Summerdrought!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Why did you move the Article, rather than just change the image if it was incorrect?

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 23:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Summerdrought. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reversion of short description at Common glider

edit

Hi Summerdrought, You reverted an addition of a Wikipedia:Short description to Common glider with a comment that "the tag is not relevant". Did you read the link which explains that this is content, not a tag, and why all wikipedia articles need a short description? If so could you explain why this article is exempt from a short description?. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 06:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Peter (Southwood), As Common glider is a disambiguation page, the paragraph On Disambiguation pages regarding the use of Wikipedia:Orphan states:
Please do not place the "Orphan" template on disambiguation pages. Summerdrought (talk) 07:22, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
That makes sense, but was not what I was referring to. I am new to AWB and didn't notice that it added the orphan tag. I will watch out for it in future. The short description is what I was intending to add, which you reverted along with the orphan tag. It is possible that you didn't notice the short description was there, and your deletion was as unintended as my extra addition. I will put the short description back, and if you have an objection, please explain on the article talk page and ping me. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 07:55, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
I found that this happened on 5 other occasions out of several hundred, so no wonder I didn't spot it. All fixed. Thanks for drawing my attention to the problem. I will try do disable this on AWB. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 08:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
OK no problem. I have never user AWB, but obviously when it is used, the results need to be confirmed. Maybe AWB is an example of poor AI perhaps!! Summerdrought (talk) 20:43, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

John Veevers

edit

Thank you for your contribution to John’s talk page. Are you able to help expand his article? Castlemate (talk) 05:36, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Castlemate Unfortunately no, I don’t have any written references. I wrote to him once because I intended visiting Veevers crater, and there were errors in the text of the crater article, particularly with the actual years quoted. Some days later I was surprised when the phone rang and it was John Veevers on the other end. We spoke for about half an hour and it was delightful to have a conversation with him and sort out the errors. I promised that I would give him a call using a satellite phone from the crater bearing his name, which I subsequently did. I also sent him some photographs taken at the crater after returning home. We corresponded a few times by email, but usually about other suspected impact craters, and he was always kind enough to provide an opinion. Summerdrought (talk) 07:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Lovely story. Thank you.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Summerdrought. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Argiope radon) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Argiope radon.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Looks good. I've added a taxobar linking this article to other online databases of species, and then made it go live by linking to this species' entry on Wikidata, also ensuring that this article connects to ones on the species in other languages, and to the Wikimedia Commons category. For some reason the link to your first citation, the Levi paper, was dead, so I found a copy on the Internet Archive and linked to that. I also specified which page this species is on. For the categories, you'd actually set the species to index under "keyserlingi"-I'm not sure if this was intentional or not? I've changed it to "radon" but obviously no worries if that's something I don't understand. Finally, the Levi citation doesn't actually specify much about location so I've added another instance of the ALA citation to provide a source for what territories it's found in. Hope that's all OK!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Blythwood (talk) 05:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

{{Re|Blythwood}} Thanks for that, keyserlingi was a mistake, so all is good! Summerdrought (talk) 06:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Essendon Airport logo.svg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Essendon Airport logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit

  Your edit to Theclinesthes onycha has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that, it has been so long since I authored a new article, it was an honest mistake.
Summerdrought (talk) 04:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply