User talk:Sun Creator/Archive 20
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Sun Creator. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
Blogs as sources
Generally speaking blogs aren't reliable sources. There are some exceptions, such as reporting precisely what the blogger has written, but this is useful only if that is itself appropriate to report in an encyclopedia. None of the rather small number of acceptable uses applies to the Keene article, which as you know is not the same as the Obama article. Quale (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 November 2013
- Traffic report: Danse Macabre
- Featured content: Five years of work leads to 63-article featured topic
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Accessibility
- Arbitration report: Ebionites 3 case closed
- Discussion report: Sockpuppet investigations, VisualEditor, Wikidata's birthday, and more
The Signpost: 13 November 2013
- Traffic report: Google Doodlebugs bust the block
- Featured content: 1244 Chinese handscroll leads nine-strong picture contingent
- WikiProject report: The world of soap operas
- Discussion report: Commas, Draft namespace proposal, education updates, and more
The Signpost: 20 November 2013
- From the editor: The Signpost needs your help
- Featured content: Rockin' the featured pictures
- WikiProject report: Score! American football on Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Ill Winds
- Arbitration report: WMF opens the door for non-admin arbitrators
A barnstar for you!
The Minor barnstar | |
You made a minor edit at the Social Work article last year....and it was a good thing. Thusly, you deserve this! Bddmagic (talk) 18:50, 25 November 2013 (UTC) |
Question
Hello Sun Creator, I see that you have just rated the article World Chess Championship 2013 as B class. What do you think could be improved about it? If it is not long enough, then what should be added into it? Thanks, Toccata quarta (talk) 19:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Post match information. Such as found in http://www.indianexpress.com/news/defeated-drained-but-viswanathan-anand-plans-next-moves/1198890/0 https://www.aftenposten.no/100Sport/sjakk/Na-vil-jeg-fortsette-a-vinne-Jeg-vil-vare-en-aktiv-verdensmester-405040_1.snd http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-25057654 Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 19:17, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
WP:AN
A discussion concerning the creation of improbable redirects, related to a page or pages you created, has started at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive257#Mass creation of very improbable redirects. Fram (talk) 11:23, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
admin assist
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{admin help-helped}} on this page with {{admin help}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
I was reverting the move of List of Steinitz Variations to Steinitz Variation but accidentally left the trailing 's'. Please revert the article to the original name of Steinitz Variation. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 00:55, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sorted. Yunshui 雲水 15:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Please note that Steinitz Variation, in its present state, is not a disambiguation page, which is purely a navigational device like a redirect. If it were a disambiguation page, the lede would only say "Steinitz Variation may refer to:", and the content of the page would be reduced to a collection of bare links, with no images on the page, and no links other than to pages referring to titles containing the phrase "Steinitz Variation", or otherwise meeting WP:DABMENTION. bd2412 T 19:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- The lede wording on MOS:DABMENTION] is just an example, not a requirement. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 19:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Excluding all material from a disambiguation page other than the links and a brief description of them, however, is a requirement, as is complying with community consensus. Please let me know now if you are unwilling to conform your conduct to the requirements of this project, so that I can take the appropriate steps. bd2412 T 19:55, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- If your interested in community consensus you'll be discussing the issue on the talk page as I suggested in a previous edit summary. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 20:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- ah, now I see you did comment on the talk page, but I never noticed it because until now the talk page was missing/had other name. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 20:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have to admit that you caught me in a bad mood. However, I can assure you, I have worked on literally tens of thousands of disambiguation pages (and hundreds of thousands of articles, generally), and I am the best authority you can find on what is or is not properly considered a disambiguation page. bd2412 T 20:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Excluding all material from a disambiguation page other than the links and a brief description of them, however, is a requirement, as is complying with community consensus. Please let me know now if you are unwilling to conform your conduct to the requirements of this project, so that I can take the appropriate steps. bd2412 T 19:55, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- The lede wording on MOS:DABMENTION] is just an example, not a requirement. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 19:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Please note that Steinitz Variation, in its present state, is not a disambiguation page, which is purely a navigational device like a redirect. If it were a disambiguation page, the lede would only say "Steinitz Variation may refer to:", and the content of the page would be reduced to a collection of bare links, with no images on the page, and no links other than to pages referring to titles containing the phrase "Steinitz Variation", or otherwise meeting WP:DABMENTION. bd2412 T 19:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 December 2013
- Traffic report: Kennedy shot Who
- Recent research: Reciprocity and reputation motivate contributions to Wikipedia; indigenous knowledge and "cultural imperialism"; how PR people see Wikipedia
- Discussion report: Musical scores, diversity conference, Module:Convert, and more
- WikiProject report: Electronic Apple Pie
- Featured content: F*&!
The Wikipedia Library's Books and Bytes newsletter (#2)
Welcome to the second issue of The Wikipedia Library's Books & Bytes newsletter! Read on for updates about what is going on at the intersection of Wikipedia and the library world.
Wikipedia Library highlights: New accounts, new surveys, new positions, new presentations...
Spotlight on people: Another Believer and Wiki Loves Libraries...
Books & Bytes in brief: From Dewey to Diversity conference...
Further reading: Digital library portals around the web...
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:47, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Chess.com
The person removing that material is most likely the sockpuppet/troll Wiki brah, whose express purpose is to disrupt wikipedia - when a new account shows up and immediately starts editing the chess.com article to paint that website in an unfavorable light, that's a dead giveaway. Why remove the material anyway? Why not just tag it if you really think it's necessary to add a citation? Is it so controversial to add an easily verifiable description of a website? It's not like it's a BLP or anything. I think it's kind of rude to remove neutrally presented material just because it is allegedly "unsourced" even though it's readily verifiable. MaxBrowne (talk) 10:51, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
There's a discussion about the redirect \xC3\x85land Islands which you created. —rybec 22:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 December 2013
- Traffic report: Deaths of Mandela, Walker top the list
- In the media: Edward Snowden a "hero"; German Wikipedia court ruling
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments—winners announced
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Wine
- Interview: Wikipedia's first Featured Article centurion
- Featured content: Viewer discretion advised
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.22 released
The Signpost: 18 December 2013
- WikiProject report: Babel Series: Tunisia on the French Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Hopper to the top
- Discussion report: Usernames, template data and documentation, Main page, and more
- News and notes: Nine new arbitrators announced
- Featured content: Triangulum, the most boring constellation in the universe
- Technology report: Introducing the GLAMWikiToolset
Precious
"Be nice if at all possible"
Thank you for quality articles on chess, its players and turtles, for fixing typos and offering tools, for asking "Be nice if at all possible", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
The Signpost: 25 December 2013
- Recent research: Cross-language editors, election predictions, vandalism experiments
- Featured content: Drunken birds and treasonous kings
- Discussion report: Draft namespace, VisualEditor meetings
- WikiProject report: More Great WikiProject Logos
- News and notes: IEG round 2 funding rewards diverse ambitions
- Technology report: OAuth: future of user designed tools
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:29, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 January 2014
- Traffic report: A year stuck in traffic
- Arbitration report: Examining the Committee's year
- In the media: Does Wikipedia need a medical disclaimer?
- Book review: Common Knowledge: An Ethnography of Wikipedia
- News and notes: The year in review
- Discussion report: Article incubator, dates and fractions, medical disclaimer
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Fifth Edition
- Featured content: 2013—the trends
- Technology report: Looking back on 2013
AARTalk listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect AARTalk. Since you had some involvement with the AARTalk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg (chat) 11:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 January 2014
- Public Domain Day: Why the year 2019 is so significant
- Traffic report: Tragedy and television
- Technology report: Gearing up for the Architecture Summit
- News and notes: WMF employee forced out over "paid advocacy editing"
- WikiProject report: Jumping into the television universe
- Featured content: A portal to the wonderful world of technology
The Signpost: 15 January 2014
- News and notes: German chapter asks for "reworking" of Funds Dissemination Committee; should MP4 be allowed on Wikimedia sites?
- Technology report: Architecture Summit schedule published
- Traffic report: The Hours are Ours
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Sociology
The Signpost: 22 January 2014
- Book review: Missing Links and Secret Histories: A Selection of Wikipedia Entries from Across the Known Multiverse
- News and notes: Modification of WMF protection brought to Arbcom
- Featured content: Dr. Watson, I presume
- Special report: The few who write Wikipedia
- Technology report: Architecting the future of MediaWiki
- In the media: Wikipedia for robots; Wikipedia—a temperamental teenager
- Traffic report: No show for the Globes