Swarlzy

May 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1][2][3][4][5][6] MrOllie (talk) 11:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Manatal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Manatal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Also, please share your relation with this company. Sonofstar (talk) 09:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manatal (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manatal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Manatal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:07, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Swarlzy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:07, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Manatal

Hello, Swarlzy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Manatal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manatal (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manatal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Manatal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manatal (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manatal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Manatal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 16:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Manatal

Hello, Swarlzy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Manatal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:40, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Swarlzy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Manatal, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:26, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manatal (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Manatal may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:29, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manatal (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manatal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 02:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manatal (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manatal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:03, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello Swarlzy. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Manatal, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Swarlzy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Swarlzy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:03, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

June 2023

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Manatal, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Swarlzy, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Swarlzy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 2A00:23EE:2678:4134:D495:A8FF:FE47:A2EE (talk) 11:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to appeal my block on Wikipedia. I understand that I was blocked for violating the guidelines by making multiple edits in a short period of time. However, I want to assure you that my intention was not to hamper the guidelines or to advertise myself. My only purpose was to pace myself in this excellent platform. I understand that my actions were in violation of the guidelines, and I apologize for any inconvenience or disruption that I may have caused. I assure you that I will not make the same mistake again. I will take my time and learn the guidelines before I make any further edits. I would like to clarify that the article I published was not through UPE, but rather by myself. I am the sole author of the article and I take full responsibility for its content. UPE did not play any role in the publication of my article. I am the sole author of the article and I take full responsibility for its content. Swarlzy (talk) 03:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manatal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manatal, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. David Gerard (talk) 17:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

I am writing to appeal my block on Wikipedia. I understand that I was blocked for violating the guidelines, I want to assure you that my intention was not to hamper the guidelines or to advertise myself. My only purpose was to pace myself in this excellent platform. I understand that my actions were in violation of the guidelines, and I apologize for any inconvenience or disruption that I may have caused. I assure you that I will not make the same mistake again. I will take my time and learn the guidelines before I make any further edits. I would like to clarify that the article I published was not through UPE, but rather by myself. I am the sole author of the article and I take full responsibility for its content. UPE did not play any role in the publication of my article. I am the sole author of the article and I take full responsibility for its content. I have learned the importance of reading and following the guidelines, and I have also learned the importance of pacing myself. I am confident that I will be a more responsible and productive user in the future. Swarlzy (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Manatal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Manatal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:38, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

I am writing to appeal the decision to delete my Wiki account. I understand that I violated the guidelines by publishing an article that was not of high quality. However, I would like to explain that I am new to Wiki and I am still learning the ropes. It takes time to build a Wiki page and I am committed to following the guidelines in the future.

I have already taken steps to improve the quality of my work. I have read the guidelines carefully and I have made changes to my article. I have also reviewed other Wiki pages and I have learned a lot about how to write high-quality content.

I am confident that I can be a valuable member of the Wiki community. I am willing to put in the time and effort to learn the guidelines and to produce high-quality content. I would be grateful if you would reconsider your decision to delete my account. Swarlzy (talk) 02:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #74582

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:42, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swarlzy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

UPE did not play any role in the publication of my article. I am the sole author of the article and I take full responsibility for its content, I have learned the importance of reading and following the guidelines, and I have also learned the importance of pacing myself. I am confident that I will be a more responsible and productive user in the future, my recent article has been deleted by wikipedia and I am willing to work on a new one by following the regulation set by wikipedia. Swarlzy (talk) 04:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Please do not use a bot to write for you. We want to hear from you, human to human, not from a bot. In any event, this wouldn't work to get the bot unblocked. 331dot (talk) 08:12, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swarlzy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Apologies for using bot to derive the request, but my intention was not to challenge the wikipedia guidelines as I was unaware regarding the bot usage. Regarding the block I just tried to apply lesser-known knowledge and cited the website which are not accepted by wikipedia, it would be appreciated if the administrator provided suggestions or declined the article, blocking is a bit of an extreme measure because It takes quite a bit of effort to maintain one account. I've learned my lesson and will be following wikipedia guidelines very closely when it comes to submitting my next article draft, Once again I apologize for any contempt of the guidelines and assure you that it won't happen again, and will be publishing articles only after detailed research. Hope you'll understand the situation and let me contribute to wikipedia Swarlzy (talk) 09:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address your violation of WP:UPE. You don't tell us how your future edits would significantly differ. You aren't going to be unblocked to write about Manatal. If this is your only goal, this is the end of the line. Yamla (talk) 12:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 Confirmed sockpuppetry as Yanak123, now blocked. This will count against you in future unblock requests. --Yamla (talk) 12:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swarlzy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As my previous reason stated that I've no intention to affect the wikipedia guidelines, my only motive was to send the article for review and I am absolutely okay with wikipedia deleting it, but blocking the account is a bit of an extreme measure, I would also like to clarify that I have not used any paid source and haven't violated WP:UPE, I;ve used my limited knowledge and would like to make sure that I will beextremely cautious before submitting any further article, my future article will not include any form of advertisement and will follow the wikipedia guidelines, i would like to clarify again that I will not be indulging in any any COI, and will also disclose any COI, would like to request to unblock my account so that I can make myself familiar with the writing style of wikipedia. Swarlzy (talk) 02:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Removing duplicate requests. Aoidh (talk) 11:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Declined unblock requests

You were already warned once before that you are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests while you are still blocked, and you then proceeded to do that again. Should you do that once more, you are very likely to have your access to this talk page revoked. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello there,

I've no clue that I was removing the declined unblock request, Can you please suggest me how I can appeal for unblocking without removing the declined unblock requests?. Swarlzy (talk) 02:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Just add a new unblock request to this page, without removing anything. In this instance, I already added your new one after putting the previous ones back Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello there,

Could you please review my latest request, thank you for your assistance. Swarlzy (talk) 02:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello there, as mentioned earlier my motive was not to challenge the wikipedia guidelines and from now on I will be extra careful before submitting a draft on wikipedia. For the draft I've submitted I did not use any external source or hired a professional, I would also like to clarify that I have not used any paid source and haven't violated WP:UPE, and if i am supposed to do so I will be declaring it while submitting my article to wikipedia,vmy future article will not include any form of advertisement and will follow the wikipedia guidelines, I would like to clarify again that I will not be indulging in any any COI, and will also disclose any COI. Swarlzy (talk) 06:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

You have an open request above, multiple open requests are not needed. 331dot (talk) 13:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Greetings,

I just followed the instructions mentioned by the administrator, but can you suggest me any alternative to appeal regarding the block?. Thank you for your assistance. Swarlzy (talk) 02:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean, but if you're wondering why your request hasn't been reviewed yet, it's because you're not the only user who's appealed a block. There is a queue and you will just have to wait your turn. Administrators are volunteers just like everyone else, and there are a lot of demands on their time. It could take days, or even weeks, before your appeal is reviewed. Please be patient. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 02:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Just to make sure, I've been submitting unblock request as the administrators have been asking for additional information and rejecting my unblock request, does that mean that my request is being reviewed and should I submit unblock request with additional information as asked by the admins by editing the source?. Swarlzy (talk) 09:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

As of this moment, you have an open (unreviewed) unblock request. If you have more information to offer, then put it inside the open request. You should only have one open unblock request at a time - do not create additional ones. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello there,

Regrading the appeal, I've followed the process you mentioned, waiting for any latest update. Swarlzy (talk) 02:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swarlzy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As mentioned before, I will be careful before submitting any article, and will be disclosing any COI (if any), and will abide by the Wikipedia guidelines and adminstrator's instruction

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. When you say will be disclosing any COI (if any) it seems like you're coping a generic unblock statement from elsewhere and not fixing it. This unblock request does not address the reason for the block, nor does it address the sockpuppetry or what type of edits you intend to make going forward. If you have a COI as you have suggested, declare it before making an unblock request. Please read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks before making another unblock request, and write the unblock request in your own words. Aoidh (talk) 11:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.