A belated welcome!

edit
 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, SweetBerry0926! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Cjse23 (talk) 15:39, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

SweetBerry0926, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi SweetBerry0926! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


December 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Rockysmile11. I noticed that you recently removed content from Monsta X discography without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rockysmile11(talk) 06:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Tayi Arajakate. I noticed that you recently removed content from Simply K-Pop without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tayi Arajakate Talk 09:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Wonho (singer), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:48, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, SweetBerry0926, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as WikiThor0322 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Rockysmile11(talk) 19:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2021

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Monsta X discography. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rockysmile11(talk) 04:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Lee Min-hyuk (singer, born 1993), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I have left a notice on several pages where you have continuously made the same edits that I have reverted without responding to the note in the edit summary. This is why it is important to leave accurate edit summaries and to check them when you are unsure why someone has undone your edits. Nangears (talk) 17:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fatal Love (album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Nangears (talk) 08:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I did not remove anything. If you are pertaining to the date in the references, I removed it simply because dates are important when the author or writer is indicated. Since some articles did not mention them, the usage of the dates were irrelevant. The access-dates are whats important. If you are pertaining to the World Albums, it is just necessarily the same. The difference is the way of presentation which is clearly valid. I just did it for uniformity of presentation. Have a nice day! SweetBerry0926 (talk) 08:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2021

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of awards and nominations received by GFriend; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Paper9oll (📣📝) 07:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Fatal Love (album)

edit

Please read the edit summaries that users leave, and if you disagree with them you should take it to the talk page rather than continue to add back the edit. Nangears (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Flavors of Love

edit

Hi. Please don't remove table captions for wikitables, as they are a requirement now per MOS:TABLECAPTION and MOS:ACCESS. Thank you. Ss112 10:06, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Also, please don't arrange "Japanese" before "Japan", as simpler forms of words come before the longer words alphabetically. You might consider Oricon more important than Billboard Japan and want it first, but this is not how we arrange chart tables. Ss112 10:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of awards and nominations received by Red Velvet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Who told that you can just add the award in the infobox only and not inside the main table? Paper9oll (🔔📝) 00:36, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello there! I know you attend to heavily edit on the Monsta X related pages but I think you need to stop doing it so much. Wikipedia has guidelines you need to follow instead of just editing however much you want. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ive (group) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please note that using publisher= is correct. In addition, the values in author= is also correct. For associated_acts, please read Template:Infobox musical artist/doc#associated_acts, no where does Iz*One matches what the documentation have stated. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 01:53, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Album Sales

edit

For changes to album sales, you need to provide a source. Please stop adding sales to pages, like at Trespass (EP), without also providing a reliable source. Nangears (talk) 18:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Monsta X discography, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Nangears (talk) 06:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! I’m not sure how to edit and I don’t want to ruin Wonho’s page so I thought I’d ask you if you would please add “Polaroid” to Wonho’s list of song credits. Written while he was still with Monsta X on the Japanese Phenomenon album, released August 19, 2020, with lyrics by Wonho, Brother Su, YVES & ADAMS, music by Wonho, Brother Su, Rich Jang, arranged by Wonho and Brother Su. Hudsonbride2 (talk) 03:22, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Hudsonbride2Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Monsta X discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 22:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ive (group) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 02:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

There's no reason to duplicate sources

edit

You just added another link to the generic page for the Gaon Album Chart, then separated the citation for Obsession when neither subsection of Wonho's discography is big enough to start separating citations. How is this a "fix"? Leave accurate edit summaries and don't unnecessarily fiddle with things, please. We have a whole website full of editors already doing that—you don't need to add to it. Thank you. Ss112 02:39, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

As I said above, please stop making pointless fiddly edits to the updates others have made to topics you're interested in, like this at Kihyun. You changed dates for the original URLs in the citations when new URLs had already been provided and you would have had no reason to use that original source. It's pedantic, just like most of your edits to Monsta X album articles. Ss112 03:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Fantasia X has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. You should also read others' edit summaries to understand why a revision was made before reverting. Please address the content of that edit summary before just restoring your own edit. If you disagree, you can always take it the article's talk page. Nangears (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fantasia X. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nangears (talk) 01:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Stop removing table captions

edit

Table captions are required for all tables on Wikipedia per MOS:ACCESS. Why are you removing them from Shape of Love? Stop. Stop giving the generic edit summary "Fixing content" when you're doing anything but—can you not be any more descriptive? And stop adding unnecessary subheadings. There is no need for "Weekly charts" as a subheading when there's only one type of chart and EP or song has appeared on. Weekly is the worldwide default type of chart unless it is specified otherwise. Ss112 02:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited We Are Here World Tour (2019), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please consider using the show preview button.

edit

Please consider using the "show preview" button before saving your edits. Almost my whole watchlist has been filled with you making 83 small edits to Monsta X. Alex (talk) 13:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited No Limit Tour (2022), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fairfax.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Follow: Find You has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. If you revert an edit someone else makes, it is helpful to explain your reasoning as to why you disagreed with the edit using the Edit summary box. Nangears (talk) 05:47, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Universe Korean Platform Logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Universe Korean Platform Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Stop restoring trivial stylisations

edit

The fact that Reason is put in all caps on a few streaming services is trivial and irrelevant. Media sources are never going to consistently render a title in all caps, meaning a lot of readers coming to the page won't know or care that it's typed LIKE THIS. See MOS:CAPS, we put stylised titles in normal caps. We disregard it everywhere else, so it's not even worth noting. Stop restoring it. Thanks. Ss112 02:04, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reason (Monsta X EP). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ss112 07:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Lightoil (talk) 02:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Please explain your contributions using an edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia without explanation causes your fellow editors to spend their time scrutinizing and verifying your work. Repeated editing without edit summary may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lightoil (talk) 03:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 00:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

For over three years people have been asking you to explain your edits--well, "Fixed content" does not explain anything, really. Drmies (talk) 00:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please help improve accessibility by not making a column all notes

edit

Hello. Please don't make edits like this. If an artist has never appeared on the main chart of a country, we don't need to make the column in a discography wikitable represent that main chart they've never appeared on. We should change the column to represent/state the chart they have appeared on. Making a whole column notes with no numerical values in it when it's supposed to be a column displaying numerical values is not helpful and impedes accessibility. Please avoid making edits like this in future. Thank you. Ss112 03:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

A reminder to not do this. You are hindering accessibility on Wikipedia by making a column all footnotes somebody has to hover over to see. If an artist has never had an entry on the Circle Digital Chart, you do not need to make the column for that chart. Make it a column for the Circle Download Chart. If I see you reverting this or doing it again on another article, I will consider it disruptive and will be informing an administrator to ask you to stop. I don't know how many articles you've done this on but it will be reverted/undone. Ss112 16:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Request

edit

Hi, I appreciate all of your contributions to improving Ive article, would you mind if it's okay with you to add details to the Artistry Section of Ive article, that part is not yet written. Thanks a lot. Cjse23 (talk) 08:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Monsta X videography

edit

Hi @SweetBerry0926 , I'm thinking of splitting the videography/filmography of Monsta X into Monsta X videography separate page. The videography of music videos are currently on Monsta X discography, they can be split/combine into one page (Monsta X videography), let me know what you think? so that I can carry it out if ever Cjse23 (talk) 01:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SweetBerry0926. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ST47 (talk) 00:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply