Swiro893
January 2010
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wellington Phoenix FC, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wellington Phoenix FC was changed by Swiro893 (u) (t) deleting 22175 characters on 2010-01-13T07:36:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:36, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Aaron Clapham
edit
A tag has been placed on Aaron Clapham, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mkativerata (talk) 23:28, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
The article Thomas Spragg has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nath1991 (talk) 07:48, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
All Whites
editHey Swiro. As a regular contributor to the All Whites article are you able to check whether the "Overall Record" table is up to date? I'm not sure if the figures have been altered after the recent build up games.
Enjoy the Cup. Go All Whites! My money's on Spain.
The article Thomas Spragg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails notability criteria for footballers. Only age group international and plays for non-professional club - and according to article has not even made an appearance yet. Notability tag has not been addressed. Only general sports coverage.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ClubOranjeT 07:49, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
edit Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2010–11 Wellington Phoenix season, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 10:34, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wellington Phoenix FC. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nath1991 (talk) 23:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Use of non-free image File:Nzfootball.png on New Zealand national under-23 football team
edit
The non-free image File:Nzfootball.png was recently restored to New Zealand national under-23 football team by you after it have been removed for failure of our non-free content criteria policy, specifically item #10c which requires a "separate, specific non-free use rationale for each use of the item". The image still fails the 10c policy requirement and has been removed from the article again. Please do not restore this image to that article again without complying with the requirements of that policy. For more information on how to write an appropriate non-free use rationale, please consult Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. If you have questions about this, please ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 13:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC) --Hammersoft (talk) 16:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:OFC U-17 Qualifying Tournament
edit A tag has been placed on Template:OFC U-17 Qualifying Tournament requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:03, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
editHi. When you recently edited New Zealand national under-23 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Kramer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Template:New Zealand squad 1999 FIFA U-17 World Cup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. C679 05:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Template:New Zealand squad 2007 FIFA U-17 World Cup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. C679 05:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Template:New Zealand Squad 2008 FIFA U-17 Women's World Cup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. C679 05:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Template:New Zealand squad 2009 FIFA U-17 World Cup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. C679 05:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Template:New Zealand Squad 2008 FIFA U-20 Women's World Cup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. C679 07:11, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Template:New Zealand Squad 2010 FIFA U-20 Women's World Cup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. C679 07:11, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of ASB Phoenix Challenge
edit
The article ASB Phoenix Challenge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable tournament, fails WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 14:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)