User talk:Swpb/Archive/2018
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Swpb. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
If there is a problem
Thank you for editing: Wikipedia: BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Very sorry, I'm not a native speaker. Please correct if there is a problem.
I found it while I translated this into Japanese version. In Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle(13:58, 14 July 2007):
- Original: The easiest way to break this cycle is to be uncivil.
- Current: The easiest way to intensify this cycle and make it unbreakable is to be uncivil.
Category:Magnetoreceptive animals has been nominated for discussion
Category:Magnetoreceptive animals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 15:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Problem with Azerbaijan National Aerospace Agency and Azercosmos
Hello, friend. When we search for Azercosmos on wikipedia, it redirects us to Azerbaijan National Aerospace Agency. These are different ones. Azercosmos is national satellite operator of Azerbaijan when Azerbaijan National Aerospace Agency is just and agency under the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Azerbaijan. I tried to change it but wikipedia intimidated me with blocking my account. Furthermore, the information at the page of Azerbaijan National Aerospace Agencyhas serious mistakes. The real information of Azercosmos is at https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=252372600 , http://www.sky-brokers.com/home/services/satellite-operators/azercosmos2 , https://azercosmos.az/about-us-azercosmos , https://www.azernews.az/business/103016.html ZahraGasim (talk) 17:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZahraGasim (talk • contribs) 16:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- @ZahraGasim: Thank you for finally answering. Yes, it does seem that there are two entities, and now we can work to present that the right way. When you leave someone a message, please put it at the bottom of the page, and sign it like this: "~~~~". (You should also keep a conversation where it started. In this case, that's your own talk page: User talk:ZahraGasim.) There is nothing wrong with trying to fix mistakes – the problem was that you refused to answer questions, and you tried to sneak around the rules. The most important part of the wiki is that we work together: if you can't work together with others, you won't get anywhere. —swpbT go beyond 19:52, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Swpb: Thank you very much for your help. I am just a new here and only yesterday have learned how to answer the questions and immediately answered to yours. Also, I would like to thank you for correcting the redirection issue and for creation the wiki page for Azercosmos. I will elaborate on it. Thank you once more. ZahraGasim (talk) 05:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Azercosmos Key people
Dear friend, the reason why I try to delete Mr. Troy Booher (September, 2015) and Mr. Wesley Wong (December, 2015) from the "key people" part is that they do not work at Azercosmos anymore. Both left the company in 2015. Management here you can find the current heads of departments. Thank you for your time — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZahraGasim (talk • contribs) 13:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- To editor ZahraGasim: Ok. Again, put your new messages at the bottom of the page, and sign them. —swpbT go beyond 13:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Problem with Azerspace-1/Africasat-1a also Azercosmos
Dear friend, I have changed many outsourced information at the mentioned pages. The column to show/write the reason did not appear that is why I decided to write you, since you were looking through it before. All the references and citations are put. Thank you for your time. ZahraGasim (talk) 13:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- To editor ZahraGasim: The box to leave an edit summary always appears directly below the main editing window, above the "Publish changes" button. I undid several of your changes, because:
- We cannot accept text that was published by someone else (WP:COPYVIO), or that promotes or advertises for the subject (WP:NPOV).
- We don't generally remove accurate statements and sources without a good reason. Although Azercosmos' predictions of a second launch in 2014-2015 proved to be too optimistic, they still should be mentioned.
- We only link terms the first time they appear in the article (MOS:BUILD), and we don't link to pages that don't exist and aren't likely to be added (Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#Red_links).
—swpbT go beyond 19:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- To editor Swpb:
Dear friend, With regards to Azercosmos
At the "services" part, as you see there "citation needed". Could you, please, let me put the information, then you check?
With regard to Azerspace-1
Azersat was the proposed name for the Azerspace; however, organization decide it be Azerspace-1, not Azersat At the "follow-on activities" part The information there is outdated. There are new interviews where Chairman informs that the satellite will be launched in mid of 2018 Could you, please, update information, of course, add the references?
Thanks in advance and for all your help
ZahraGasim (talk) 07:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think you understand the problems, so I can't do what you're asking:
- In "Services", the problem is not that the text you want is false or not sourced, but that 1) it reads like an advertisement, and 2) I don't think you wrote it. Adding a reference will not fix those problems.
- If "Azersat" is wrong, fair enough; I've taken it out. But the information in "follow-on activities" is not outdated, for the purpose of completeness: although Azersat did not launch a satellite in 2014 or 2015, they announced plans to do so, and that alone is important information to include – it puts the new, 2018 plan in context. —swpbT go beyond 15:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Tye (whistleblower)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Tye (whistleblower) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 22:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- Also – this will be the first GA review I've done in years, so I might ask for a second opinion before making any sort of final review. Thanks! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 22:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Tye (whistleblower)
The article John Tye (whistleblower) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Tye (whistleblower) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of L235 -- L235 (talk) 00:41, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Tye (whistleblower)
The article John Tye (whistleblower) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Tye (whistleblower) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of L235 -- L235 (talk) 16:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi swpb. I noticed you've extensively contributed to a number of high-quality science articles (I initially came across Rotating locomotion in living systems. If you'd be interested in putting any through external peer review and academic publication, let me know. The WikiJournal of Science dual-publishes articles both as a stable PDF, and into Wikipedia to benefit from the rigours of formal peer review, as well as the extreme reach of the encyclopedia (e.g. The Cerebellum). Anyway, let me know if you're interested. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 05:59, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Help
Hi, Swpb
Please help me move "Qidong, Jiangsu" to Qidong City and "Qidong County, Hunan" to Qidong County. there is not any ambiguity between Qidong City and Qidong County. thanks. Cncs ( Talk) 02:24 March 30 2018 (UTC)
- I do not know enough about the naming conventions for Chinese place names to feel comfortable doing this for you. Please ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese). —swpbT go beyond 13:07, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Old Norse
A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Old Norse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Fayenatic London 07:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Trump associates associated with Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
Category:Trump associates associated with Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April, the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Coldcreation (talk) 08:29, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- To editor Coldcreation: Are you familiar with the different types of deletion? Because CFD is not CSD, and this category obviously isn't speediable. —swpbT go beyond 13:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People associated with Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
Category:People associated with Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 10 April, the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Coldcreation (talk) 17:40, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
Giacomo Balla
Just out of curiosity, are you aware that the work of Giacomo Balla will not be in the public domain in its home country, nor in the United States, until 1 January 2029, unless published prior to 1 January 1923? I noticed a few weeks ago that you uploaded a number of works by this artist. If there exists a publication (or publications) prior to 1923 where these works were reproduced could you please let me know? I would be interested in looking at it (or them). Thanks in advance. I too have uploaded a couple of works by Balla. here for example. It was published in 1914, here. Coldcreation (talk) 17:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Let's start with this one: In the file summary for Woman Sewing by Giacomo Balla (1887) you wrote "Original publication: 1887". What publication was that? Please provide a link to it, or the full reference (and page number). I noticed in the summaries your "Original publication" dates always coincide with the date of execution. It would be very rare at the turn of the century that artists had their works published every year, and even rarer the year they were produced. Please provide this information so as to avoid the time consuming process of deletion of these works. Again, thanks in advance. Coldcreation (talk) 06:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note, this is not just a case of an individual painting the copyright status of which is controversial or problematic, but of all the works you uploaded by Giacomo Balla (over seventy of them) none of which appear to have been published before 1923; contrary to what you claim. Coldcreation (talk) 17:04, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- Would you care to comment? Coldcreation (talk) 13:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- If you have nothing to say about the uploads I will proceed with the process of having these works speedily deleted. Coldcreation (talk) 09:23, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Before I begin the deletion process, I will revert several of your edits that converted files originally uploaded as Non-free 2D art to PD-US-1923; such as here. That way, some of the images and corresponding articles may be salvaged. Coldcreation (talk) 14:06, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- If you have nothing to say about the uploads I will proceed with the process of having these works speedily deleted. Coldcreation (talk) 09:23, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Would you care to comment? Coldcreation (talk) 13:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note, this is not just a case of an individual painting the copyright status of which is controversial or problematic, but of all the works you uploaded by Giacomo Balla (over seventy of them) none of which appear to have been published before 1923; contrary to what you claim. Coldcreation (talk) 17:04, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Balla A Worker's Day.jpg, File:Balla Woman Sewing.jpg, File:Balla Self-Portrait.jpg, File:Balla Self Portrait 2.jpg, File:Balla Landscape.jpg
Tags have been placed on File:Balla A Worker's Day.jpg, File:Balla Woman Sewing.jpg, File:Balla Self-Portrait.jpg, File:Balla Self Portrait 2.jpg, File:Balla Landscape.jpg, requesting that they be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Coldcreation (talk) 15:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Files listed for discussion
Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 April 25 if you are interested in preserving their usage.
- File:Balla Woman Sewing.jpg
- File:Balla Self-Portrait.jpg
- File:Balla Self Portrait 2.jpg
- File:Balla Landscape.jpg
- File:Balla Luna Park.jpg
- File:Balla Bankruptcy.jpg
- File:Balla Outdoor Portrait.jpg
- File:Balla A Worker's Day.jpg
Thank you. Coldcreation (talk) 07:56, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Category:Political organizations of Iraq has been nominated for discussion
Category:Political organizations of Iraq, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 16:53, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 1.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 4.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 5 - Eucalyptus.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 5 - Eucalyptus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 7.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 7.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Iridescent Compenetration.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iridescent Compenetration.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Iridescent Interpenetration (1913).jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iridescent Interpenetration (1913).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 13.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 13.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Study for Iridescent Interpenetration No. 13.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Study for Iridescent Interpenetration No. 13.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Study for Iridescent interpenetration (from the Düsseldorf notebooks).jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Study for Iridescent interpenetration (from the Düsseldorf notebooks).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Study for Iridescent Interpenetration No. 2.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Study for Iridescent Interpenetration No. 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 20:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Balla Abstract Speed - The Car Has Passed.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Balla Abstract Speed - The Car Has Passed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Balla Abstract Speed.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Balla Abstract Speed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Balla Alberi Mutilati.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Balla Alberi Mutilati.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Balla Dynamic oF Boccioni's Fist.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Balla Dynamic oF Boccioni's Fist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Balla Flags for the Altar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Balla Flags for the Altar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Balla Speeding Automobile.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Balla Speeding Automobile.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Iridescent Compenetration.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Iridescent Compenetration.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Iridescent Interpenetration (1913).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Iridescent Interpenetration (1913).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 4.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 5 - Eucalyptus.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 5 - Eucalyptus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 7.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 7.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 13.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Iridescent Interpenetration No. 13.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Study for Iridescent interpenetration (from the Düsseldorf notebooks).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Study for Iridescent interpenetration (from the Düsseldorf notebooks).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Study for Iridescent Interpenetration No. 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Study for Iridescent Interpenetration No. 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Study for Iridescent Interpenetration No. 13.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Study for Iridescent Interpenetration No. 13.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Template:Non-diffusing listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Non-diffusing. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Non-diffusing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 00:30, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:ForCount
Template:ForCount has been nominated for merging with Template:For loop. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 21:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Mapshapes
About Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 167#Possibility of editable-on-wiki status maps?: I wonder whether the mapshape feature would do what you want. If memory serves, User:RolandUnger is the expert on that. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 15:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- I think such maps should be possible using the mapframe tag. (1) Either one can use mapshapes directly from a set of Wikidata ids or (2) generate them with a SPARQL query from Wikidata as shown at Help:Extension:Kartographer for governors of US states with their party affiliation. But only equirectangular projection can be used. --RolandUnger (talk) 16:12, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Arcapita.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Arcapita.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Deletion of categories for domestic women’s association football leagues by year
Please see my proposal to delete (and upmerge where necessary) the following categories: Hugo999 (talk) 01:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Category:People associated with Chatham House has been nominated for discussion
Category:People associated with Chatham House, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:08, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Adjacent
Re this edit, how is "adjacent" any better than "to the right"? It's still just as meaningless to people having pages read to them by assistive software per the guideline you cited. In this particular case the image is not even adjacent to the paragraph that refers to it in html so will be even more confusing in mobile view. SpinningSpark 21:20, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- The ideal solution is to label the caption and refer to the label, "Figure A" or similar. Left/right references are specifically proscribed by the MOS, so if you want to challenge that, the guideline's talk page is the place to do it. —swpbT go beyond 14:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- What I'm saying is use some common sense. Replacing a form of words that are only meaningful to some readers with a form that is still meaningless to the rest, and in addition confusing to the group you are trying to help is not a sensible thing to do. Actually, the MOS does not generally proscribe anything i absolute terms. Right at the top of the page it says that this "is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense..."
- I disagree that "adjacent" is not an improvement, but I pointed to you an even better solution that you are free to implement. —swpbT go beyond 16:32, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- What I'm saying is use some common sense. Replacing a form of words that are only meaningful to some readers with a form that is still meaningless to the rest, and in addition confusing to the group you are trying to help is not a sensible thing to do. Actually, the MOS does not generally proscribe anything i absolute terms. Right at the top of the page it says that this "is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense..."
Orphaned non-free image File:Sabra logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sabra logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — trlkly 11:43, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
structurism | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 1766 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
AfD nomination: Riding Rockets
Hello, I am writing to inform you that I have nominated Riding Rockets for deletion, under the criteria in WP:NOTE, specifically WP:BOOKCRIT. I have recently finished the book, and intend to expand the articles for Mike Mullane and Judy Resnik using the contents of the book. However, I do not consider the book itself significant enough to merit its own Wikipedia article. I hope to hear your thoughts on the matter at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riding Rockets. Thank you. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 03:31, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Swpb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)