This is an archive of past discussions with User:Synoman Barris. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi,
Thank you for taking a look at the Draft:Jo Bamford page I was working on. I appreciate the feedback :)
I'm new at this and was wondering if you could give me some pointers on how to improve it? I know you're busy so any advice you can offer would be great. Thanks! --Eatthecrow (talk) 20:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
While I think the initial edit was grammatically poor, we don't have to cite plot sections; they are hammered out strictly through consensus. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there,
Re the added content requiring a source. I am the source, I am an engineer who works on the vehicles in question and over time I have personally carried out the modifications that make up the added/edited content in the article. LRV1007 (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Tools
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Copyright notice on the Zane Grey Theatre article.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am sorry but the user who added that gave no valid reason to why a copyright notice should be there. It was merely an act of vandalism, seemingly, and should be reverted. What is supposed to be copyrighted and not covered by fair use? _ The Mummy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.90.0.73 (talk) 11:33, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Help with citing
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I think you made a mistake. I removed content on Grand Council of Bern, but adequately explained the reason. The last election was held in 2018, and the current composition is explained in the infobox on the top right corner. The summary and explanation in the "Composition" section is outdated and misleading. There is also a banner that calls for updates. No need for overpolicing. Thank you for your understanding. --95.237.77.50 (talk) 12:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi,
I recently deleted the content of the Edelman Fossil Park Wikipedia page. I know this seems like a mistake, but my employer requested I remove the content so that it can be reviewed and edited offline before resubmitting. Is this okay? I'm not sure if there is another way to keep the content but turn off the page from the public until it is ready to go live?
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Synoman Barris. Thanks for your time and efforts for reviewing this article. I observe that you have placed a speedy deletion tag. As the article is informational for the aggrieved consumers as per Consumer Protection Act'2019, it is not written to promote any organisation or institution. The portal is created to facilitate for complaints in case of any fraudulent trade. Request you to kindly remove the tag. Gardenkur (talk) 07:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Request to become a student
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hello! I've been an active reader and IP editor for many years, and a few months ago I decided to create an account, something I should have done long ago. Anyways, I'm leaving you a message to ask if I can become a student of the Counter-Vandalism-Unit.? Leave a message on my talk page for a response. Thank you,Telefocus (talk) 21:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Telefocus, Hello , thank you for your message and welcome to Wikipedia. I regret to inform you that I am not able to take you through CVUA as my student for the following reasons:
You have not reached the minimum threshold of 200 mainspace edits
Looking through your edits, your not involved in antivandalism work
Youve some behavioural notices on your talk page which aren't solved yet
Most, if not all of your edits are to your talkpage or Wikipedia namespace.
Synoman Barris, I understand, I could have sworn the whole point of the Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy was to learn to spot and counter vandalism, which is why I am asking to be a student, so I can learn. I also read the page and it does not appear there are requirements to become a student of the CVU. Telefocus (talk) 16:04, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Leart Paqarada page edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello,
I have made some edits voluntary to the page of Leart Paqarada but i received an notification that you removed all the changes.
I actually have changed his stats by updating them on the actual season. I just want to let you know that all the informations i put in the change are verified and you can find them in the official page of the Club and also on https://www.transfermarkt.de/. So, i think you have made a mistake.
Latest comment: 2 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
Hey you seem to be the only instructor left that seems to be possibly available in a timezone that is close to mine I notice that it says you aren't accepting students but the other instructors say they forgot to update their thing or remove themselves from it so I am assuming you may have a spot. I wish to become a student in the CVUA to learn how to better handle vandalism on Wikipedia as it will be my primary focus in my time being here. I hope you will consider taking me on as a student and I hope you have a great day. SkyTheWolf (Talk) 14:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Do however note that at this time I have 184 edits to the mainspace but am currently attempting to get that number to above 200 to prove that I have mastered the "principles of basic editing" according to the CVUA page. SkyTheWolf (Talk) 14:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello , thank you for taking interest in CvUA. Unfortunately, I may not have the time to take you through the course at this time due to some real life issues . Otherwise welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Cheers Megan B....It’s all coming to me till the end of time14:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
@Synoman Barris I just wanted to note you said you may not have time to take me through the course however it does not matter to me whether you take a while to respond I just was hoping to do the course no matter how long it takes so if you are able to do it on and off I would be grateful to still be a student and do the course regardless of the time it takes. So I hope that this may make you possibly reconsider. SkyTheWolf (Talk) 15:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for working on move-reqs. One nit in your tagging at Talk:Mount Gambier: the {{old move}} box says "from Mount Gambier to Mount Gambier" but the move was actually from "Mount Gambier, South Australia". I wonder if there is a bug in mCloser that it followed the redirect that previously existed? Of if because you did that script after the actual move it used "current name" rather than parsing the move-req? DMacks (talk) 15:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 804 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 851 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
New Page Review queue June 2022
Hello Synoman Barris,
Backlog status
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]
In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).
Backlog drive
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.
TIP – New school articles
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
Misc
There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 13705 articles, as of 04:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot
There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Thank you for your interest in the account creation process, as well as your interest in joining the ACC team as an ACC Tool User. I have reviewed and discussed your application with other ACC Tool Administrators, confirmed that you meet the required minimum qualifications for prospective new ACC Tool User candidates, and verified that you have signed the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. Given your application, as well as the level of experience and perceived trust that you've accumulated on Wikipedia, I have approved your ACC Tool User request and activated your ACC Tool User account.
You may now access the ACC Tool User interface by clicking here. Before you begin handling any new ACC requests, please ensure that you have completely read though, reviewed, understood, and familiarized yourself with the ACC Tool Users' Guidelines, as well as Wikipedia's username policy.
Please subscribe yourself to the ACC Tool User private mailing list by clicking here and following the instructions on that page. Having an active subscription to this mailing list with an email address of yours is required in order to maintain an active ACC Tool User account. If this is not completed in a timely manner, your ACC Tool User account will be temporarily suspended until you complete this process, so please be diligent in getting subscribed.I've already done this for you. See the email that I sent you for more information. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs)02:40, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
I also advise and encourage you join us on IRC - instructions for how to join can be found here. The ACC team has a private channel, #wikipedia-en-accountsconnect, that is restricted to active ACC Tool Users and ACC Tool Administrators only. In this channel, a bot automatically informs us as soon as a new account request is submitted to the ACC new request queue, and you can get real-time information, help, and advice from other ACC Tool Users and ACC Tool Administrators on policies and procedures, and how to properly handle certain requests there. Although joining us and participating with us on IRC is advised and highly encouraged, it is not required and you are not obligated to do so.
With your ACC Tool User account, you are (by default) only allowed to create up to six Wikipedia accounts per day (every 24 hours), and you won't be able to create an account if it is found to be similar to the username of another Wikipedia account. ACC account requests for usernames that are similar to other Wikipedia account usernames are placed into the "Flagged user needed" queue on the ACC Tool User interface. Only users who have the account creator user right (and hence are allowed to create accounts with similar usernames, as well as create an unlimited number of new accounts per day) should handle requests that are in this queue. After a few months of demonstrating experience and consistency with following all ACC Tool User processes and procedures (at least a minimum of three months of tenure and 50+ handled requests are expected), if you find yourself reaching the limit of six new accounts per day frequently, and find yourself without new requests that you can handle frequently (by not being usernames that are similar to others), you can request having the account creator user right granted to your account by filing a new request here.
Please note that the account creation process is not a race, and each new account request must be handled diligently, accurately, thoroughly, with care, and within compliance of the ACC Tool Users' Guidelines. Failure to correctly assess ACC account requests will result in corrective action up to and including suspension of your tool access and your ACC Tool User account. Releasing any kind of personally identifiable information (such as a user's IP address, email addresses, or other non-public information), whether intentionally or unintentionally, is treated as an extremely serious violation of the ACC Tool User policy, as well as your compliance with the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information that you signed with the Wikimedia Foundation, and will usually result in immediate suspension of your ACC Tool User account.
The consistent and full compliance with the ACC Tool Users' Guidelines, Wikipedia's username policy, and the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information (including all policies and procedures outlined within those pages), the correct and accurate handling and closure of new ACC account requests, and the strict compliance with the non-disclosure of any and all non-public information that you'll have access to within the ACC Tool User interface is expected at all times, and is a condition of your ACC Tool User account's standing and your membership with the ACC Tool User team.
Now that all of the mandatory warnings, explanations, and rules have been disclosed to you, let me end this on a positive note by welcoming you to the ACC team. Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions, and I'll be more than happy to answer them and help you. Thanks again for your interest with participating in the account creation process, and I welcome you as a new member of the ACC team! ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs)02:38, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
enrollment
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
New Page Review queue August 2022
Hello Synoman Barris,
Backlog status
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.
Coordination
MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
Open letter to the WMF
The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
TIP - Reviewing by subject
Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
New reviewers
The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Synoman Barris,
Invitation
For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Synoman Barris, my name is Machibito and I would like to be part of the CVU Academy, I know how to use the Ultraviolet tool to reverse non-constructive edits and I have scrapped some edits with it, although I would like to learn more about how this tool works to avoid committing an error, a greeting. Machibito (¿A question?)21:12, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi,
I don't want to take much of your time, but just wanna know what exactly is missing from the draft when I have provided multiple independent and reliable Kenyan sources for the bio? For example, these sources give in-depth coverage of the subject: [1], [2], and [3]. Thanks in advance. Insight 3 (talk) 04:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
IPBE
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I see that you gave them IPBE for one year with zero reason logged. The original steward ticket does not explain the reason why they still need IPBE at this time so far after expiry. If they would like to email stewards again and ping me, I'd be happy to look. If you also want to email me too, that's fine. I just can't grant for absolutely zero reason. -- Amanda (she/her)16:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm responding to your message this evening declining my Draft:Lisa B (Lisa Bernstein). I need some clarification on one thing you wrote. Also, I suspect that because of issues with the initial section of the draft, you overlooked the many solid citations in the subsequent sections of the draft that point to significant, published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject and focus directly on her, not in passing. I believe the problem is that the initial section lacks these, and I ask you to reconsider by more closely reviewing the subsequent draft sections.
The subject is notable because unlike anyone else, she is a popular practicing psychic as well as a well-published and awarded literary poet as well as a much-reviewed jazz singer. These latter two aspects of her professional work are referred to DIRECTLY, not in passing, in the citations in the two sections on her work as a poet and as a singer. All the citations in these two sections are significant, published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. But I think you may have overlooked this because the initial section of the draft about her work as a psychic lacks published material that can be cited and therefore does not have the same quality of citations. But under the section "Books and Publications," citations 9-11 note books authored by the subject that are published or about to be published by prominent literary publishers, including one university press. After this, citations 13-23 refer directly to prestigious literary journals and anthologies that have published the subject's poems. These are not passing references but examples of actual publications. I did not give a full citation for every single publication by listing volume, journal no., etc. (and I could if you recommend it), but these 13 citations are significant examples. The section also includes citation 12 which notes a prominent award from the National Endowment for the Arts in creative writing that was given to the subject. Few other honors are as great in American literature. The next section of the draft on "Jazz and Groove Singer and Spoken-Word Artist" also includes many citations of independent, reliable sources that focus directly on the subject; these verify her notability as a singer/spoken-word artist. Citations 24-40 are reviews that prominently focus on B (Bernstein)'s seven recordings, usually reviewing just her most recent recording but sometimes including recent related releases by others; still, these are direct, not passing, references to the subject, and a review of more than one musical artist at a time is customary in these journals. These include the most important jazz journals in the United States (Jazz Times, All About Jazz, L.A. Jazz Scene, etc.). Citations 41-43 give examples of her widespread radio play. Can you give another look at these two sections of the draft? I believe you will see that they meet the criteria for significant sources verifying the subject's notability as a literary poet and a singer/spoken-word artist, including the uniqueness of being both. As for her notability as a psychic, it's difficult to cite independent sources for this, but it would be inaccurate to leave out of the draft. Would it make more sense to move this section last or de-emphasize it? I agree that the references to workshops given by the subject are unfortunately less substantial, but the nature of this work leans against written references. Finally, I don't understand what you mean by "Too much primary sources." I don't mean to offend you, and I realize you are probably working quickly and using some shorthand, but grammatically "much" goes with a singular noun rather than a plural noun like "sources." Do you mean too much content from one primary source? Or too many different primary sources? Also, I don't know which primary source or sources you're referring to. In any case, I do see that the first section on her work as a psychic lacks the solid and numerous citations of the other sections of the draft. In summary, given what I've written above, I hope you'll see that it is simply not true to say that citations 9-45 at minimum, and a couple of the initial citations, are NOT reliable, independent, secondary sources showing the subject's notability. I believe that they are and you may have been misled by the initial summary section and the section on the subject's psychic practice. Could you reconsider? Or advise me of an editing path to move this forward to acceptance? Thank you so much, LS
Hello, the reason I declined your draft was due to the presence of many primary sources, I would advice you to remove the sources such as Facebook, not use her self written blogs to cite sections. After you've corrected the mistakes with the references I advice you to resubmit the article once again for another reviewer to take a look. Cheers Megan B....It’s all coming to me till the end of time11:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.
Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.
Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.
NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022
Suggestions:
There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.
Backlog:
Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
Reminders
Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello Synoman Barris,
New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
2022 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
Reminders
Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Synoman Barris! After reviewing the ACC tool user reinstatement request that you emailed to me, your ACC account and history, and the items required for ACC tool user access reinstatement, this message is to inform you that your ACC tool user access reinstatement request has been approved. I've re-subscribed you to the ACC tool user mailing list (again, per your request), and your ACC tool user access permissions have been reinstated on your ACC account. Welcome back! :-)
If you're active on the Wikimedia Liberia Chat IRC network, please email me your IRC nick and cloak so I can grant you access to the private ACC tool users channel on IRC. If you have any questions or need assistance with anything else, don't be a stranger! I'll be more than happy to offer you a hand. Otherwise, you should be all set and you can resume using the tool immediately. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs)21:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Something to be aware of as a global rollbacker involved in ACC: Per Wikipedia:Global rights policy#Global rollbackers, Global rollbackers may use the rollback, suppressredirect, markbotedits, and noratelimit functions on the English Wikipedia only in the context of counter-vandalism efforts. Since normal people are only allowed to create 6 accounts per day, and the only reason you can create more is the global rollbacker flag, per policy you are required to create no more than 6 accounts per day until you get noratelimit some way other than through global rollbacker status (such as by becoming an account creator). * Pppery *it has begun...17:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello Pppery am aware of that policy but thanks for reminding me :). I realised that on 5th May I created one extra account above the normal limit, it was all an error on my part due to my confusion in timezones , however I realised this and stopped. Have a nice day and happy editing. Cheers --Megan B....It’s all coming to me till the end of time19:21, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello Kailash29792, I reviewed this version of the draft, at that state and from my source search I couldn't confirm that the film had begun principal photography, therefore declined it per NFF. While there is improvement in the current draft (the author has given a source to confirm principal photography has began), it seems to be bombarded with alot of sources many of which are unreliable/or have questionable reliability i.e Times of India. Still needs a cleanup IMO. Cheers Megan B....It’s all coming to me till the end of time07:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
The Times of India comes between no consensus and generally unreliable per WP:TOI. But it seems acceptable for non-government purposes as this is a film article. Either way, it shouldn't be an obstacle to getting the article to mainspace. Given that Captain Miller (film) is currently a redlink, I could easily move it. But I prefer to play fair. Kailash29792(talk)14:14, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Megan, I'm unsure why you closed the RM at Chinese Communist Party. My understanding is that the function of the thread is to investigate whether a consensus can be established on moving the page, and that the discussion is to be closed either when one is established or when it becomes clear one cannot be established.
While it is certainly true that a consensus had not been established at the point of your closure, the discussion was still active; the most recent a comment against the move occured at 3AM 12/05 (this morning), and a response was given at 7AM (by me). I'd also note that I'd articulated the case for movi
While it is certainly true that a consensus had not been established at the point of your closure, the discussion was still active; the most recent a comment against the move occured at 3AM 12/05 (this morning), and a response was given at 7AM (by me). I'd also note that I'd had some success justfying the move to an editor who previously had not found the move justified. As such, it seems reasonable that a consensus could have been reached in the course of the discussion.
Please let me know if there is anything I am missing regarding policy here, as I am relatively new to editing Wikipedia. However, if I've got the general gist of the procedures right, I'd appreciate it if you could reopen the RM.
Hello, RM are usually open for seven days unless relisted if consensus is not reached. When I read through the RM, it was obvious to me that there was a consensus and it was not to move since valid points were given by the editors opposing that was relevant to policy. I think this is better suited for a WP:MR since am unsure whether to reopen the discussion while I believe it shall lead to the same result. Cheers Megan B....It’s all coming to me till the end of time17:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Account creator granted
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
After reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:
The account creator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! stwalkerster (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Rejected new version of Firmao article
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi,
I have noticed that my article has been deleted again. Several versions have been created, and with each subsequent one, I have improved the article to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. Previously, there was a version of the article with fewer references, but they were of high quality. It was rejected because it did not meet the notability criterion. I created another version that included the previous references and added new references found on the internet. This version was also rejected. As I mentioned before on my profile, this entry is a project for my studies, and I have no affiliation with the company. It is crucial for me to add it to Wikipedia as it will contribute to a higher grade. Please provide specific information on which part of the article needs improvement, which references to remove/add, and any other steps I should take to successfully get this article on Wikipedia.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.
Hello Synoman Barris,
The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Synoman Barris,
New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023
Backlog update:
At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive:
A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades:
Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip:
Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip:
If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Synoman Barris:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
New year, new scripts. Welcome to the 23rd issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering around 39% of our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. That’s right, we haven’t published in two years! Can you believe it? Did you miss us?
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
User:Alexander Davronov/HistoryHelper has now become stable with some bugfixes and features such as automatically highlighting potentially uncivil edit summaries and automatically pinging all the users selected.
To a lesser extent, the same goes for User:PrimeHunter/Search sort.js. I wish someone would integrate the sorts into the sort menu instead of adding 11 portlet links.
Aaron Liu: Watchlyst Greybar Unsin is a rewrite of Ais's Watchlist Notifier with modern APIs and several new features such as not displaying watchlist items marked as seen (hence the name), not bolding diffs of unseen watchlist elements which doesn’t work properly anyways, displaying the rendered edit summary, proper display of log and creation actions and more links.
Alexis Jazz: Factotum is a spiritual successor to reply-link with a host of extra features like section adding, link rewriting, regular expressions and more.
User:Aveaoz/AutoMobileRedirect: This script will automatically redirect MobileFrontend (en.m.wikipedia) to normal Wikipedia. Unlike existing scripts, this one will actually check if your browser is mobile or not through its secret agent string, so you can stay logged in on mobile! Hooray screen estate!
Deputy is a first-of-its-kind copyright cleanup toolkit. It overrides the interface for Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations for easy case processing. It also includes the functionality of the following (also new) scripts:
User:Elominius/gadget/diff arrow keys allows navigation between diffs with the arrow keys. It also has a version that requires holding Ctrl with the arrow key.
Frequently link to Wikipedia on your websites yet find generating CC-BY credits to be such a hassle? Say no more! User:Luke10.27/attribute will automatically do it for ya and copy the credit to yer clipboard.
User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft, a spiritual successor (i.e. fork) to Evad37's script, with a few bugs solved, and a host of extra features like check-boxes for choosing draftification reasons, multi-contributor notification, and appropriate warnings based on last edit time.
/CopyCodeBlock: one of the most important operations for any scripter and script-user is to copy and paste. This script adds a copy button in the top right of every code block (not to be confused with <code>) that will, well, copy it to your clipboard!
m:User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/AceForLuaDebugConsole.js adds the Ace editor (a.k.a. the editor you see when editing JS, CSS and Lua on Wikimedia wikis) to the Lua debug console. "In my opinion, whoever designed it to be a plain <textarea> needs to seriously reconsider their decision."
GANReviewTool quickly and easily closes good article nominations.
ReviewStatus displays whether or not a mainspace page is marked as reviewed.
SpeciesHelper tries to add the correct speciesbox, category, taxonbar, and stub template to species articles.
User:Opencooper/svgReplace and Tol's fork replaces all rasterized SVGs with their original SVG codes for your loading pleasures. Tell us which one is better!
ArticleInfo displays page information at the top of the page, directly below the title.
/HeaderIcons takes away the Vector 2022 user dropdown and replaces it with all of the icons within, top level, right next to the Watchlist. One less click away! There's also an alternate version that uses text links instead of icons.
Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello everyone, and welcome to the 24th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. Uh-huh, we're finally covering the good ones among the rest! Aren't you excited? Remember to include a link in double brackets to the script's .js page when you install the script, so that we can see who uses the script in WhatLinksHere! The ScriptInstaller gadget automatically does this. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Featured script
Making user scripts load faster by SD0001 is this month's featured script, which caches userscripts every day to eliminate the overhead caused by force-downloading the newest version of scripts every time you open a Wikipedia page. Despite being released in April 2021, our best script scouters have failed to locate it due to its omission from the US of L. For security reasons, the script only supports loading JavaScript pages.
Newly maintained scripts
After earthly attempts at improving the original have failed...
Ahecht has created a fork of SiBr4/TemplateSearch, which adds the "TP:" shortcut for "Template:" in the search box, and updated it to be compatible with Vector 2022.
AquilaFasciata/goToTopFast is a much faster fork of the classic goToTop script that also adds compatibility for Minerva and Vector 2022.
Without caching. Each script takes 400–500ms. A particularly large script takes 1.11 s! Internet download speed is 50 Mbps.With caching enabled. Each script takes just 1-2 ms to load.
Improve a script
Unfortunately, this section has remained nearly identical. Help us out here!
To a lesser extent, the same goes for PrimeHunter/Search sort. I wish someone would integrate the sorts into the sort menu instead of adding 11 portlet links.
Dragoniez/SuppressEnterInForm stops you from accidentally submitting anything due to pressing enter while in the smaller box, and works on almost anything... except the InputBox element itself, used in subscription lists and the Signpost Crossword! Oh, the humanity!
Doǵu/Adiutor(pictured) provides a nice, integrated interface to do some twinkley tasks such as copyvio detection, CSD tagging, and viewing the most recent diff.
Eejit43 has quite the aesthetically pleasing scripts, all made in TypeScript.
/afcrc-helper is a replacement for the unmaintained Enterprisey/AFCRHS and processes Redirects for Creation and Categories for Creation requests.
/ajax-undo stops the "undo" button from taking you to another page while providing a text box to provide a reason for the revert.
/redirect-helper(pictured) adds a much better interface for editing and redirects, including categorization, for which valid categories are dictated by /redirect-helper.json.
/rmtr-helper helps process technical requested moves without being able to actually move them.
Guycn2/UserInfoPopup(pictured) adds a flyout after the watchlist star on userspace pages that displays the common information you might use about a user.
Jeeputer/editCounter, under userspace, adds a portlet link to count your edits by namespace, put them in a table, and put that table in a hardcoded subpage, all in the background.
Hilst/Scripts/sectionLinks converts all section links to use the § sign, which are known to be preferred over the ugly # by 99% of the devils I've met.
PrimeHunter/Category source.js adds portlet links to tell you where a category for an article comes from and supports those from template transclusions.
Sophivorus's MiniEdit adds some nice, li'l buttons next to paragraphs to edit their wikitext with a minimal interface.
Edit-listings
Dragoniez/ToollinkTweaks adds more and customizable links next to users in page history, logs, watchlist, recent changes, etc.
Firefly/more-block-info optimizes the display of rangeblocks in contribution pages. Doesn't work outside the English locale of any wiki, unfortunately.
NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/AjaxLoader makes paging links (e.g. older 50, 500, newest) load without refreshing and makes you realize how slow your internet actually is.
Appearance-ricing
Ahecht/RedirectID adds the redirect target to all redirects. For all the WP:NAVPOPS haters. (Do these exist?)
Dragoniez/MarkBLockedGlobal: Remember the "strike blocked usernames" gadget? Now you can use a red, dotted line to highlight rangeblocks and global locks!
Jonesey/common(pictured) has some styles to overhaul your Vector 2022 experience. It reduces padding everywhere, and makes the top bar animation faster.
Aaron Liu/V22 is a fork that narrows the sidebars instead of upheaving them, reverts the January 2024 dropdown changes, and restores the old page-link color for links that don't go outside the current wiki.
Nardog: SmartDiff is a spiritual successor to Enterprisey/fancy-diffs. It makes the page title part of links in diffs clickable, along with template and parser function calls. Unnamed parameters can be configured per template to also be linked. All links are styled based on the normal CSS classes of rendered links.
For the paranoid: Rublov/anonymize replaces your username at the top of the screen with the generic "User page" text. Remember, it is your duty to persuade everyone that editing is an honor.
/AjaxBlock provides a dialog box for easy input of reasons while blocking users.
/Selective Rollback(pictured) provides a dialog box to customize rollback edit summaries and does them without reloading the page. Seriously, why doesn't MediaWiki already do this?
/flickrsearch adds a portlet link to search for uploadable flickr images about the subject.
/randomincategory adds a portlet link when on Category pages to go to a random page in the current category.
Vghfr/EasyTemplates adds a portlet link to automatically insert some of the most common inline {{fix}} templates.
Yes, we're just doing 'em as we go now. Thanks for reading through this looong issue, if you did! I'm sure this'll send a record for the longest issue ev-ah. You may need to wait even longer for the last issue, as our reserve of old-y and goodie scripts have ran out... We encourage you to try and do some of the requests or improvement tasks. See you in Summer, hopefully!
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Synoman Barris,
New Page Review queue January to March 2024
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey there, welcome to the 25th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 1 March 2024. We've got a ton of wonderful editors taking back their pitchforks today. Don't worry, for they come in peace, to forcibly fix and extend existing scripts you use with sheer passion. There's so many, them forks have got what's basically their own column now! gift us with some rows before it's too late Aaron Liu (talk) 04:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
To a lesser extent, the same goes for PrimeHunter/Search sort. I wish someone would integrate the sorts into the sort menu instead of adding 11 portlet links.
An easily configurable script to add a link to the #p-vector-user-menu-overflow portlet with a name, target, and icon. This one should be a relatively easier one. I would do it myself, but I'm too busy rotting away on Celeste (video game).
After the ＲＩＩＪ update, Aaron Liu: Watchlyst Greybar Unsin has a dismiss button that allows you to mark an item as read in one click and cycle to the next Watchlist item.
Lordseriouspig/StatusChangerImproved is just like Enterprisey's script, except you select your status from a dropdown instead of cycling through them with a button. The WMF operates out of car-centric infrastructure anyway. Shame!
Newly maintained scripts
Aaron Liu has created Duplinks from Evad37/duplinks-alt; his fork adds a config variable to automatically highlight duplicate links on the loading of any page where the portlet link would've appeared.
Tired of staring at a bunch of filtering text and waiting for darn filter logs to load? Msz2001/AbuseFilter analyzer can parse abuse filters into a visual syntax tree and evaluate locally on-demand!
Polygnotus/DuplicateReferences finds references with the same link and displays the number of them along with a button to add the {{duplicated citations}} tag under the references section. Being lazy has never been easier!
fastest gun on the net Ponor/really-quick-block really quick add to contribution lists three buttons awesome
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Latest comment: 8 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Barnstars will be awarded.
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Featured script
Updated scripts
Improve a script
Requested scripts
New scripts
The redirect Roger Schmidt (footbaler has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 10 § Roger Schmidt (footbaler until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Newly maintained scripts
.png)
.png)
Requested scripts
