Welcome!

Hello, TTKK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  DVD+ R/W 05:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Help with Template:Infobox_architect

edit

Hi TTKK -- we're working on an edit-a-thon for Architects Building Wiki, starting with architects in Detroit, Michigan. Would you be free for a quick call to help us navigate the infobox and some ideas? Les733 (talk) 18:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Vyborg Library

edit

Hello, thanks for your information about the Vyborg Library. Your contributions are appreciated. This article was on my to-do list but I lacked data. I split your additions into a separate article, Vyborg Library, which you are welcome to check. --Ghirla -трёп- 14:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm afraid it was me who got thing wrong. Looking at this picture, I assumed that it is the acoustical ceiling, which I've seen on an old photograph in his book. Or is it another ceiling, in fact? --Ghirla -трёп- 16:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Philosophers

edit

Hey. Thanks for adding the philosophers section to List of Finns. I added a few more from the category, but it still seems heavily infested with redlinks, which is non-optimal considering how long the whole list has become. I also think Eeva-Liisa Manner might fit better to another section. Maybe you can clean it up a bit? Prolog 08:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the reply. It sounds great to have a good list of Finnish philosophers there. Prolog 09:53, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Category:British people

edit

Hi, well done on all your good work categorising articles. I just thought that I ought to point out there is no need to place articles in the Category:British people when they are also in one of the sub-categories: e.g. Michael Foot was in several sub-categories, and it is considered bad practice to duplicate categs in this way. (There are a few exceptions to this rule, but they are rare).

When you are categorising people, it is also a high priority to classify them by date of birth and death. Here are some examples:

Winston Churchill
  • [[Category:1874 births|Churchill, Winston]]
    [[Category:1965 deaths|Churchill, Winston]]
Tony Blair
  • [[Category:1953 births|Blair, Tony]]
    [[Category:Living people births|Blair, Tony]]
Aderk of Iberia
  • [[Category:Year of birth missing|Aderk of Iberia]]
    [[Category:Year of death missing|Aderk of Iberia]]
Lord Lucan
  • [[Category:Possibly living people births|Richard Bingham, 7th Earl of Lucan]]

Hope this helps! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

  Did you know? was updated. On October 16, 2006, a fact from the article Vyborg Library, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Elia Zenghelis

edit

In reply to your concerns on this article, the main issue is that it does not cite sources, nor does it really assert Zenghelis' notability. Koolhaas seems to be quite clearly notable, and many sources are cited for his notability outside of the corporation. Zenghelis, on the other hand, seems to be mainly only "notable by association", which would mean he'd fit better under the corporation's article. Seraphimblade 19:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Another architect bio?

edit

Hello TTKK, how is everything? After seeing a pretty harsh talkpage comment by a new user at Talk:Peter Eisenman, I was wondering if you would like to work on improving that article. Seeing as how you recently did such a great job expanding the article about Kenneth Frampton and re-writing the one about Rem Koolhaas, I thought you might also consider working on and expanding the article about Peter Eisenman. Let me know what you think, you can discuss anything with me about this that you want or just start writing. I've seen good things from you and trust that you would do that well. Regards, DVD+ R/W 05:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for all your hard work! Could you announce your new pages on Portal:Architecture/New article announcements? Thanks in advance, Ghirla -трёп- 15:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nordic Classicism

edit

Hi. It's great that you started the article, I nominated it on T:TDYK and hope to see it on Main Page soon. I plan to write something about Russian Neoclassicism of the 1910s when I have more time. I'd like to write an article about stripped classicism someday and illustrate it with an image of Peter Behrens's German Embassy in St. Petersburg. Don't know when I have leisure for all this, though. Best, Ghirla -трёп- 19:28, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! And I for one would definitely be interested in Russian Neoclassicm of the early 20th century, before Stalinism (I added a mention to Stalinst architecture of the "Soviet" embassy in Helsinki). I got in a mention of the more earlier St.Petersburg-Helsinki axis. greetings --TTKK 19:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Did you know?

edit
  On 21 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nordic Classicism, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo (t)(c) • 14:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Photos

edit

It is in fact a bad idea to upload any free content to the English Wikipedia. This is the mistake I did on some of my photos before I registered at Wikimedia Commons. Uploading there is in fact no more difficult. (Getting the description template right the first time may take some time.) -- Petri Krohn 11:13, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

If the difficulty persists you may send them to me at yaroslavl dot gmail dot com. --Ghirla -трёп- 14:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks! I'll have another go this evening - and if it fails then, I'll send a couple to you - not wishing to overload anyone :) --TTKK 16:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks Petri for the advice to persist! And thanks Ghirlandajo for your very kind offer. I finally managed to work out where I was going wrong; and have now uploaded my first few pictures; will soon start adding pictures to the articles I've written on various Finnish architects.Reply

British Spelling in Alvar Aalto Article & Appropriate Place for Comments

edit

First of all, I apologize for changing the spelling of neighbourhood. My browser pegged it as a questionable spelling when I was adding the link to Turku, so I changed that too. I have, by the way, changed it back myself. Secondly, I would appreciate it if you would restrict your comments to my discussion page rather than my user page in the future. Bobby 04:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Agent Z

edit

Hi, sorry for the (3 month!) delay in responding, I've been on a bit of a WikiHoliday :)

I've started uploading a few book covers, feel free to alter the formatting etc as I'm just putting them somewhere vaguely sensible for now! --Jenny 15:32, 29 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Omnitopia

edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Omnitopia, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omnitopia. Thank you.

Sami Rintala

edit

A tag has been placed on Sami Rintala, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.Stellatomailing 03:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reference footnotes

edit

Hi TTKK, many thanks for your contributions. I know it was a while ago but I was just wondering if you could revisit your contributions to the architectural theory article and add footnote references for the information you added. See Wikipedia:Footnotes and Wikipedia:Citing sources for details on how to do this. The easiest way I know is to add <ref></ref> around the information about the book, only without typing the nowiki code. In the next month or two I will be expanding this article in an attempt to bring it to Wikipedia:Featured article status which, for all intents and purposes, requires some 5 or 6 footnotes per paragraph, and if you could add some reference footnotes to the text you added it would save me a lot of work, and I wouldn't have to rewrite much of what you added.D. Recorder 01:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: Guardian podcast members

edit

There is a connection then? It's very tentative, however; I don't see why they should all be linked together for that reason. - Dudesleeper / Talk 10:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Waldemar Wilenius

edit

Sorry about the notability tag! And thanks for taking the time to translate the page from another WP. --skew-t (talk) 10:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Use of shared accounts

edit

Your user page says "TTKK is a contributor collective in Tampere, Finland. Their interests..." etc. You appear to be saying that the account is a joint one, used by a group of people. Probably you were not aware that joint accounts are contrary to Wikipedia policy: you can read more on this in Wikipedia's Username policy and in the FAQ on organizations. You are, of course, welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, but to do so you should each set up an individual account. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, based on the rules, I've done what is called a "soft block" of this account because it is clearly a shared account. You should each have your own account. If you reply on this talk page and ask to be unblocked because now only one person is using it and the password is only known to that one person, I will unblock this account. I'm doing this because you have invested time and effort in building the encyclopedia and have no doubt a good reputation among other users. I'll now leave a block template so as to make life easier on you when you are ready to be unblocked. Please stay on Wikipedia; your contributions are valued, but we have to play by the rules.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for having a shared account. If you believe this block is unjustified, or once the account is no longer shared, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I'm sorry if the language in that template seems harsh, but I'm using this one to allow you to use the unblock request without having to wait for me to be around. So you can either leave a message here or submit an unblock request. Good luck and again thanks for your contributions!--Wehwalt (talk) 12:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

' {{unblock|in fact only one user}} In fact there is only one person actually writing; Me! I put 'shared on my contributor description in acknowledgement of my work colleagues who have occasionally corrected my mistakes -- but they tell me if I've got something wrong, they can't be bothered to open a Wikipedia account themselves. I simply didn't want to take the credit!--TTKK (talk) 07:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Actually, that should have read "I simply didn't want to take all the credit" --TTKK (talk) 07:30, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Sounds good. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

Request handled by:Jake Wartenberg 19:09, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Fence/Fencing

edit

Thanks for your correction on Hurdle – it should of course have been Fence all along. Must be because I'm a farmer – fences always need mending, so I tend to think of a fence as a task not a thing! (Might have been helpful if you'd explained your edit a bit more fully...) Regards, Richard New Forest (talk) 22:56, 25 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello TTKK! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Timo Airaksinen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Arto Haapala - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Leila Haaparanta - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Andrew Benjamin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mack Scogin Merrill Elam

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Mack Scogin Merrill Elam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 22:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Lucien Kroll

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lucien Kroll, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.greatbuildings.com/wiki/Lucien_Kroll. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Leila Haaparanta

edit
 

The article Leila Haaparanta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP on academic. No claim of contributions or discoveries, so unsuitable for an encyclopedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 16:53, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tapani Koivuniemi

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tapani Koivuniemi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:05, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tapani Koivuniemi for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tapani Koivuniemi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tapani Koivuniemi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philip Morton Shand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Stirling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:15, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timo Penttilä, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lapland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Architecture of Finland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ==Early architecture - 1809 (including the Swedish colonial period==

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:29, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Architecture of Finland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • even [[medieval architecture]], but also contemporary sources elsewhere in Europe and even the USA (e.g. [[H.H. Richardson]] and the [[Shingle Style]].<ref>Kennth Frampton, ''Modern Architecture - A

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Architecture of Finland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [File:Puu Käpylä district Helsinki.jpg|thumb|right|150px|Puu-Käpylä workers' housing area Helsinki ((1920-25)]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:02, 21 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Simo Paavilainen may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *Vehkalahti Parish Centre, [[Hamina, 2002.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Architecture of Finland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Viikki]] (plan by Petri Laaksonen), adjacent to a new campus for the University of Helsinki.<ref>[http://www.hel.fi/static/ksv/julkaisut/eco-viikki_en.pdf Eco-Viikki - Aims, Implementations,Results,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:27, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Architecture of Finland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Functionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Architecture of Finland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Sami and Lapland
Rainer Mahlamäki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rauma

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hack Kampmann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Viborg and Stege
Architecture of Finland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Functionalism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Architecture of Finland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rauma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Culture of Finland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • of modernist architecture. Among his most famous buildings are [Vyborg Library|Viipuri Library]], [[Vyborg]] and the [[List of MIT undergraduate dormitories#Baker House|Baker House]] dormitory at

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Alvar Aalto

edit

First I want to thank you for adding and revising information on the article; however I am confused as to why you did a number of edits. First, the removal of any reference tends to defeat the idea of "referenced works". Understandably, there are times that references need to be removed for whatever reason. The removal of the Encyclopedia Britannica and some of the "Brown" referencing seems to not benefit the article. Secondly, changing the style of referencing ie removal of the <Group=nb> style to suit yours or others personal style or preference is contrary to the Wikipedia rules and etiquette. I am not trying to ruffle your feathers, as I do appreciate the work you have done, and I prefer to talk with you rather than just reverting things back to the way they were. Please consider changing some of these items back to the way they were. Obviously, incorrect information and bad references have no place here but, like I enumerated above, some of your changes should probably hot have occurred. Thanks speednat (talk) 20:43, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

In hindsight, I will re-add the references as there is no reason not to have references, even saturated as they were. Thanks speednat (talk) 20:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I am a specialist in Finnish architecture and also Aalto. Over the years I have contributed quite a bit to the Alvar Aalto page. References are indeed very important. And you will see that I am presently adding extra ones - but proper ones, not ones taken from a populist encyclopedia or tourist guidebook. The "references" added to quite a few of the names of Aalto buildings in the "Significant Buildings" section were utterly meaningless, and bear no correspondence between the reference and the list; it would be like sticking "Encyclopedia Britannica" next to every place name in Wikipedia. Over the next few days I hope to add far more references to the Aalto page. I am also presently adding masses of material to eh Architecture of Finland pages, with plenty of proper references.--TTKK (talk) 21:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I always start off trying to be nice; however it rarely seems to matter. It really is irrelevant whether you are an expert or Alvar Aalto himself as original research is not allowed therefore, it would still come down to sources. Something you need to understand is that Wikipedia works a specific way to allow others like me and other non-experts to edit. Your analogy is totally off base, as the references are not there to say the place exists (I assume that is what you are trying to impart), but that the work was done by Aalto and the dates involved. Why would that information not need to be referenced? I know I am not an expert on Finnish architecture or Aalto, but I do understand the proper way to reference things. Encyclopedia Britannica is considered a relevant and accurate reference; however with anything there may be mistakes that is why more than one source would be used. Please do not allow your pride to interfere with the proper way that the wiki works, and in case you don't realize how pompous you sound, your reply to me really makes you sound pompous and all-knowing, and key words like utterly meaningless, irrelevant, etc. are demeaning and insulting to those that take time to edit and improve the wiki. I also do not like when someone tells me to not do something that is totally acceptable to do, just because they (I am talking about you) feel their way is the only way. I always look at user's home pages to try to get a feel for the user that I have a difference of opinion with, and I had a sneaking suspicion that you were going to act exactly as you did. Please do not take me the wrong way, as I really do not want a confrontation; however I also will not put my tail between my legs and walk away just because you think you own the article. Cheers speednat (talk) 21:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
What "scholarly" reasons could you possibly have to remove relevant references? To attempt to not escalate the situation further, I will take a step back temporarily, to see what you are planning on doing; however I reserve the right to step in at any time to fix what needs fixing regardless of your feelings. speednat (talk) 21:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
I will leave you with this piece of reading, which you may or may not have ever read, and if you have, you may or may not have forgotten. Then there is this section. I find that I need to re-read these sections to prevent problems, others may also need to. speednat (talk) 22:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Architecture of Finland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • with the construction of the [[Suomenlinna|Sveaborg]] fortress - nowadays a [[World Heritage Site]]) - (first planned by [[Augustin Ehrensvärd]]) on a group of islands just off the coast from

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:33, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Heikkinen – Komonen Architects may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * Laavu prototype house (2007

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:21, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Architecture of Finland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Europe - though in terms of shape and street pattern it is similar to [[Palmanova]] in Italy). However, following the so-called [[Russo-Swedish War (1741–43)|Hat's War]] between Sweden and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suomenlinna Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nicholas I (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Architecture of Finland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nystad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lars Sonck may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Järvenpää; in the [[Nordic Classicism]] style are the housing blocks on Museokatu Street, in Töölö]], Helsinki (c. 1920) and the Mikael Agricola Church, Helsinki (1935).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kaija Siren may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * 1956 [[Otaniemi Chapel]], Espoo, [[Finland

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi, just to note, wikilinks such as at Usko Nyström need two square brackets each side; so the first linked page in the article would not be [Helsinki University of Technology], but [[Helsinki University of Technology]], which comes out as Helsinki University of Technology. All the best, Matty.007 16:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Architecture of Finland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pantheon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Finland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Functionalism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Paris poster 1895.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Paris poster 1895.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, TTKK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Architecture of Finland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ralph Erskine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Roger Connah

edit
 

The article Roger Connah has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BangJan1999 20:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, TTKK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, TTKK. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Birger Carlstedt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Finnish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philip Morton Shand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stockholm Exhibition.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nobody Knows (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahn Ji-ho.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your interest in architecture

edit

Hi there, TTKK, and thank you for all your efforts on Architecture of Finland. You may be interested in taking a look at Architecture of Denmark which is a candidate for GA reassessment. You will see how things are proceeding on the article's talk page. You might be able to help us along. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply