CONE Welder not MMOG

edit

CONE Welder looks very cool, but it really doesn't seem to fit in the MMOG category. There might be another place for it, possibly Serious games? Although if it's brand new, it might be rejected everywhere as not notable. I can't find an article/category, but it reminds me of Games with a purpose (GWAP). There should eventually be a round-up article on games like this that have distributed person-work. Anyway, I won't remove CONE Welder from MMOG yet, so you can argue for it on the talk page if you think it's worth arguing.Cretog8 (talk) 22:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

June 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Berkeley Center for New Media

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Berkeley Center for New Media, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://bcnm.berkeley.edu/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Berkeley Center for New Media

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Berkeley Center for New Media requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Toon(talk) 22:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply