Welcome

edit

Hello, Tatasport, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CT Cooper · talk 10:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much!  tatasport&nbselarusp; talk with me here 06:34, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Celtic F.C. task force

edit

Hello, you have a userbox which suggests you are a fan of Celtic F.C. I am hoping to start up a task force for Celtic at WikiProject Football.
If you are interested please reply here. Thanks. Adam4267 (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for starting that up I was worried that no-one was going to reply, even though I sent out over 50 of those messages to people who had Celtic userboxes. Adam4267 (talk) 10:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Which of these pictures do you think would be best for our template. [[1]] [[2]] [[3]] [[4]] Adam4267 (talk) 11:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think Glasgow Derby - Rangers is the Old Firm although I have never heard it referred to as that. Adam4267 (talk) 01:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jungle Bhoys

edit
 

The article Jungle Bhoys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 23:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Football In Scotland task force

edit

As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Football a new Football In Scotland task force has been set up as you edit Scottish football articles i would like to invite you to become a member if you wish.Warburton1368 (talk) 15:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Scottish taskforce new articles

edit

A new article section has been set up on Scottish taskforce project page. As you are a taskforce member I would ask you to submit any new articles you create or articles you have created since the 5 August relating to Scottish football on the project page. Thank you (★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★) 14:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Our Sound Years

edit

 Template:Our Sound Years has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 23:22, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

edit

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

edit

help me

edit

Tolong donk, saya sedang diblokir nih di WBI dengan alasan melakukan intimidasi terhadap banyak sekali orang yang tidak setuju dengan pencalonan "televisi" sebagai artikel pilihan. Padahal jelas-jelas tidak ya kan pak. Saya kan hanya suruh mempertimbangkan saja atau hanya bercanda. Kalo gitu sampaikan permintaan pencabutan status blokir terhadap sang pemblokir tersebut (id:Pengguna:Stephensuleeman) Kasihanilah saya to, masak saya harus menikmati liburan Lebaran yang kemudian masih dilanjutkan pada saat liburan Natal nanti dengan keadaan didalam jeruji besi gini. Lagipula jika 1 saja pengguna yang ada di WBI tidak ada/tidak aktif/mengundurkan diri/alasan lain maka berkuranglah pula pertambahan artikel disana. --Erik Evrest (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Kalo gitu sampaikan permintaan pencabutan status blokir terhadap sang pemblokir tersebut (id:Pengguna:Stephensuleeman) disertai dengan penyataan bahwa Anda (sebagai voters tidak setuju pada pengusulan AP "Televisi") tidak pernah diperlakukan seperti demikian terhadap saya. Itu aja sih --Erik Evrest (talk) 23:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Apaan sih Tata ni, tak perlu bukti link. Cuma perlunya kasih permohonan pencabutan status blokirnya aja sama sang pemblokir tersebut (id:Pengguna:Stephensuleeman) disertai dengan pernyataan bahwa saya tidak pernah diperlakukan seperti demikian. Apalagi saya juga diberi alasan vandalisme padahal jelas-jelas tidak. --Erik Evrest (talk) 04:44, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Tata, begini. Saya udah 5 hari tak omongin mengenai permasalahan yang jadi topik pada pesan yang saya ajukan kepada Anda. Kenapa Anda belum sedikit pun melakukan permintaan saya ? Bukannya saya parasit tapi saya butuh bantuan agar para pengurus memahami saya cuma karena yang pertama mereka tidak menyahut dan yang kedua saya diblokir jadi tak dapat menyunting di WBI. Saya melakukan hal ini karena Wikipedia menjunjung tinggi asas kebebasan berbicara secara mutlak. Tapi apa sih yang Anda lakukan di WBI hanya mengurusi kegiatan menyambut pengguna baru sama buat artikel Eurovision. Katanya Anda mau pake acara ngecek/nyelidikin bukti-bukti yang ada (saya kaga ngerti maksudnya) Maaf ini bukannya ngejek lo tapi Anda tu sok jadi sarjana hukum ya. Memang hasil yang Anda dapatkan apa sekarang. Saya pun juga minta sampaikan permohonan ini kepada si Stephensuleeman cuma Anda sedikit pun tidak bergolak. Yalah, mungkin Anda lewat email atau surel sehingga saya kaga tau. Maaf juga kalo saya sedikit kasar karena saya juga agak stres ama masalah ini. Oh ya, sampaikan juga masalah ini ke Warung Kopi biar dapat dibicarakan lebih riil --Erik Evrest (talk) 06:09, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hey, kau ini kawanku atau musuhku sih sebenarnya ? Atau malah hakim, jadi kalo misalnya saya benar Anda langsung tindak lanjuti namun jika misalnya saya salah maka Anda membiarkan saya diblokir begitu saja. Ditambah kegiatan membantu saya di-nomor-dua-kan dan me-nomor-satu-kan proyek artikel berkategorikan kejuaraan olahraga tenis. Mengenai pesannya sih sebetulnya semua orang yang tidak setuju dengan pencalonan "televisi" sebagai artikel pilihan saya beri pesan yang sama (maksudnya saya copy-paste secara beruntun) jadi pesan dari halaman pembicaraan Anda itu sudah mewakili sih. Saya memang tidak memaksa tapi hanya suruh mempertimbangkan mengingat yang mengikuti pemungutan suara masih dari golongan orang baru. Dan buktinya saya tidak terlalu memaksa kan. Oh ya, saya juga mengejek pak Sentausa "Si Lamban dari WikiLand" sama saya mengejek mas Ezagren "Anak Durhako" (buktinya ada pada halaman pembicaraan mereka masing-masing di WBI) Tapi itu cuma lagi bercanda aja. Sama halnya id:Pengguna:Mimihitam beri julukan pada id:Pengguna:Willy2000 "BadutWiki" disini ==> id:Pembicaraan Pengguna:Willy2000/arsip3#Interwiki. Oh ya, di spam blokir saya juga ditulis alasannya kalo saya diblokir juga karena alasan vandalisme padahal jika Anda lihat di halaman daftar kontrib saya sama sekali tidak ada. Cek aja sendiri ==> http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Istimewa:Kontribusi_pengguna/Erik_Evrest
Bahkan menurut saya pemblokiran ini amat keterlaluan karena saya ini termasuk pengguna lama di WBI (soedah sedjak tahoen 2009) Terus juga saya udah giat berkontribusi di WBI. Ditambah saya tak pernah melakukan vandalisme artikel (seperti yang saya singgung sebelumnyya) dan hanya masalah sosialisasi saja terhadap sesama pengguna (yang sebetulnya hanya salah paham saja) Jadi tidak boleh diperlakukan kaya para anon vandalis yang biasanya kaya kutu loncat (suka gonta-ganti alamat IP supaya tidak ditangkap oleh pengurus) Sebetulnya beberapa pengguna di WBI (melalui via Wikipedia bahasa Inggris) sudah saya minta dan mereka melakukannya hanya saja Anda harus sampaikan kepada Stephensuleeman dengan lebih mendalam karena siapa tau dapat merubah keadaan. Bicarakan juga hal ini di warung kopi di WBI karena agar dapat didiskusikan dengan lebih nyata. Kasihanilah saya to masak saya harus menikmati liburan Lebaran yang kemudian masih dilanjutkan pada saat liburan Natal nanti dengan keadaan didalam jeruji besi gini. --Erik Evrest (talk) 08:50, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oi ###Tat, Anda itu ya menulis pesan terakhirnya itu lebay banget deh. Sok hormat gitu.

thumb|center|Yap, terlalu hormat

Kaga perlu gitu juga kali, biasa aja kali. Udah deh saya dah tau diskusi Anda dengan si Stephen. Kaga perlu disampaikan. Cuma gini, soal canvassing itu saya sebetulnya cuma ngasih info aja. Tidak nyuruh buat vote setuju. Liat saja pesan saya tentang ini di halaman pembicaraan Anda. Dan kenyataannya yang saya infokan malah kebanyakan vote tidak setuju. Sama halnya dengan Anda menginfokan soal pengikut sertaan ProyekWiki Tenis. Lagipula alasan pemblokirannya tetap "Perilaku intimidasi/pelecehan: vandalisme" dan tidak ada kata "canvassing" sementara alasan pemblokiran yang masih tertera (seperti yang telah saya singgung sebelumnya) juga tidak terlalu bukan. Jikalau diubah kan sama saja "menyalah-nyalahkan" kan. Pengurus, birokrat, bahkan steward di seluruh Wikipedia itu kan semuanya manusia yang tak lepas dari kesalahan. Begitu pun Stephen. Ia kelihatannya bersikap teguh demi menjaga mana baiknya sebagai pengurus. Jadi mungkin dengan melakukan kegiatan pemblokiran dengan alasan paling kecil pun menjadi kebanggaan tersendiri baginya dan jika mencabut status blokirnya mungkin suatu rasa hina baginya. Jadi mungkin Anda perlu bicarakan ini ke pengurus lain atau ke Warung Kopi di WBI (seperti yang telah saya singgung sebeblumnya cuma Anda ngeyel) agar dibicarakan secara lebih nyata serta semoga masalahnya dengan cepat terselesaikan. --Erik Evrest (talk) 04:14, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Terserah Anda sih. Bahkan kalo sampe konferensi Wikimania juga boleh. Silahkan saja --Erik Evrest (talk) 04:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
WWWWAAAAAA!!!!!! TTTTIIIIDDDAAAKKKKK!!!!!!
 
'AAAAAAAAAAAAA.....!!!!
Kenapa namanya "Minta Tanggapan". Berarti yang kita dapatkan cuma komentar aja donk. Bukan tindakan. Harusnya "Jadi gimana nih?" (untuk kalimat terakhir harusnya gitu) Oh ya, Warung Kopinya juga jangan di bagian "Kebijakan". Mendingan di "Lain-Lain" karena selain lebih diperhatikan juga kalo dikebijakan kita mintanya kebijakan bukan tanggapan. Jadi yang di bagian "Kebijakan" harus dipindah pokoknya dan diubah dari minta tanggapan (komentar) jadi minta tindakan. Itu aja. Karena jika kita hanya mendapatkan tanggapan maka sama halnya menulis diatas air sementara jika tindakan maka sama halnya menulis diatas batu. Oh ya, diskusikan hal ini juga ke pengurus WBI yang lain juga donk biar lebih eksklusif. Kalo perlu steward di Meta-Wiki. Oh ya, apa Anda juga memperdebatkan ini di Facebook ? Atau bahkan juga di Twitter, Yahoo!, Gmail, atau di blogspot. Hhhmmmm.... mungkin hanya ini saja yang dapat kuminta kepada Anda. Tapi semoga Allah merahmati kita. --Erik Evrest (talk) 06:25, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Tapi bagaimana dengan melaporkannya dengan pengurus WBI yang lain ? Makasih--Erik Evrest (talk) 09:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Non-free files in your user space

edit

  Hey there Tatasport, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User talk:Tatasport.

  • See a log of files removed today here.
  • Shut off the bot here.
  • Report errors here.
  • If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:03, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Oh ya, sekedar inpoh aja kalo saya juga punya 1 link yang (diyakini) dapat menuntaskan masalah pemblokiran saya di WBI ==> http://id.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pembicaraan_Pengguna:Stephensuleeman&diff=prev&oldid=4693300

Yap, itu pesan seorang user WBI bernama Sentausa yang mendapatkan pesan kalo saya sedang diblokir dan minta dicabut status blokirnya dan menyinggungnya kepada Stephensuleeman si tukang blokir. Sentausa bisa jadi kunci akan penuntasan masalah ini mengingat Mimihitam (seorang pengurus) mengatakan bahwa Sentausa merupakan salah seorang yang saya intimidasi-kan (bukti) Bukankah yang namanya "masalah" adalah "dimana ada 1 pihak yang dirugikan" yang itu berarti pihak tersebut merupakan kunci ke arah mana "masalah" ini akan berakhir. Keputusan pengurus itu kan (kurasa) hanya karena mereka merasakan kalau saya sedang bertindak seperti itu. Padahal sebetulnya tidak. Sama halnya Anda lihat orang lagi kecopetan terus copetnya lari dan Anda gebukin tuh copet namun Anda haruslah hentikan karena sebetulnya adegan pencopetan itu cuma sedang syuting sinetron aja   Demikian juga dengan permasalahan saya sekarang ini, saya diblokir tapi sebetulnya dengan "korban" menyatakan bahwa permasalahan ini cuma karena pelecehan yang sebetulnya bercanda, intimidasi yang sebetulnya cuma memperingatkan untuk mempertimbangkan kembali saja, vandalisme yang sebetulnya cuma hoax, dan canvassing yang sebetulnya cuma memberi info saja. Kiranya Anda dapat menggunakan link tersebut untuk pembebasan saya dari status blokir tersebut dengan mencantumkannya di diskusi warung kopi di WBI atau jika Anda berkomunikasi terhadap pengurus. --Erik Evrest (talk) 12:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

edit

cepat-lah

edit

Tata, seharusnya Anda sampaikan donk permasalahan saya kepada para pengurus lainnya selain ke Stephensuleeman. Lebih cepat lebih baik. Anda taukan kalo ini permasalahan diskriminasi. Anda tentunya harus segera cepat tanggap sebisa mungkin jika mengetahui hal tersebut. Sama halnya Anda melihat suatu kejahatan di dunia nyata (misalnya pembunuhan, kemalingan, dll) maka sebelum keburu terjadi Anda tentu laporin ke pihak berwajib kan. Ibaratnya "Jangan pernah kau menjadwalkan pengampunan dosa pada pukul 10 karena siapa tau kau mati jam 8". --Erik Evrest (talk) 06:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

edit

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

edit

The Signpost: 26 September 2011

edit


The Signpost: 3 October 2011

edit

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

edit

tulung

edit

maukah Anda buat sebuah halaman voting di WBI untuk memutuskan soal masalah diatas (dilepaskan status blokirnya apa tidak, seperti ini lho ==> http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peringanan_persyaratan_menjadi_seorang_pengurus ) Diberi pula keterangan berupa pesan saya yang paling atas sebagai alasan saya kalo saya mau dilepaskan masa blokirnya.--Erik Evrest (talk) 23:16, 7 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Segeralah Anda buat halaman voting itu, tak perlu mikirin "kaidah kalimat" karena tinggal Anda copy-paste semua ke halaman votingnya. --Erik Evrest (talk) 03:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

edit

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

edit

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

edit

The Signpost: 7 November2011

edit

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

edit

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

edit

Celtic F.C. task force

edit

Hi, are you still interested in participating in the WikiProject Football/Celtic F.C. task force, you don't appear to have made an edit to a Celtic-related article for a significant period of time. If you would like to continue as a member of the task force please say so, the more people participating the better. But if not I would request that you remove your name from the particicpants list. Thank you. Adam4267 (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oh ok, I see you are mainly focusing on songs. This isn't really an area the task force has been covering, I think it is better that we improve existing articles rather than create lots of new stub articles. Although if you are looking to create new articles, there are plenty of season articles to be made, we can easily get sources for the later ones so they can be made better than stubs. Adam4267 (talk) 18:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hey Tatasport, if you are looking for something Celtic related to do. Could you please add squad lists to the season articles that don't have any yet. Here is a source for it [5]. Thanks very much. Adam4267 (talk) 20:51, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yes it's the players the club used during that season. If you go onto one of the seaspns woth a squad list you will be able to take the template off it and use that source to fill in the players. Thanks very much mate. Adam4267 (talk) 20:57, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
No not the matche, the squad lists. Like this [[6]. Adam4267 (talk) 11:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I don't mean to be rude but I'm not quite sure why you don't understand what I'm saying. Can you actually speak English? Adam4267 (talk) 17:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ok, can you do the squad lists for the seasons that don't have squad lists. Adam4267 (talk) 12:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Adam4267 (talk) 13:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
No you still don't get what I mean. I want you to add a squad section to this article. Using the source I gave you above. Adam4267 (talk) 13:58, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks man, that's really helpful. Great job :) Adam4267 (talk) 12:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Haha, cheers for the cupcake. But you are helping me more than I am helping you. Great job and I hope you continue to improve Celticc's coverage on Wikipedia. Adam4267 (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

edit
edit

Hi. In 2004–05 Celtic F.C. season, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Craig Reid, Alan Thompson and Paul Lawson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

edit

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

edit

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

edit

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

edit

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

edit

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

edit

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

edit

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

edit

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

edit

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

edit

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

edit

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

edit

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

edit

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

edit

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

edit

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

edit

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

edit

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

edit

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

edit

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

edit

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

edit

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

edit

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

edit

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

edit

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

edit

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

edit

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

edit

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

edit

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

edit

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

edit

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

edit

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

edit

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

edit

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

edit

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

edit

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

edit

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

edit

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

edit

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

edit

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

edit

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

edit

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

edit

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

edit

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

edit

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

edit

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

edit

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

edit

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

edit

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

edit

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

edit

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

edit

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

edit

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

edit

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

edit

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

edit

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

edit

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

edit

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

edit

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

edit

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

edit

taste the beer my friend

edit
  this beer is created with sing auld lang syne Hima fethus (talk) 14:37, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

edit

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

edit

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

edit

Nomination for deletion of Template:Songs for the Bhoys

edit

 Template:Songs for the Bhoys has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. BDD (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

edit

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

edit

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

edit

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

edit

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

edit

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

edit

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

edit

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

edit

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

edit

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

edit

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

edit

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

edit

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

edit

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

edit

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

edit

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

edit

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

edit

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

edit

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

edit

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

edit

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

edit

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

edit

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

edit

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

edit

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

edit

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

edit

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

edit

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

edit

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

edit

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

edit

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

edit

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

edit

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

edit

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

edit

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

edit

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

edit

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

edit

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

edit

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

edit

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

edit

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

edit

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

edit

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

edit

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

edit

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

edit

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

edit

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

edit

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

edit

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

edit

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

edit

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

edit

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

edit

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

edit

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

edit

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

edit

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

edit

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

edit

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

edit

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

edit

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

edit

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

edit

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

edit

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

edit

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

edit

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

edit

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

edit

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

edit

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

edit

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

edit

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

edit

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

edit

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

edit

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

edit

The Signpost: 23 July 2014

edit

The Signpost: 30 July 2014

edit

The Signpost: 06 August 2014

edit

The Signpost: 13 August 2014

edit

The Signpost: 20 August 2014

edit

The Signpost: 27 August 2014

edit

The Signpost: 03 September 2014

edit

The Signpost: 10 September 2014

edit

The Signpost: 17 September 2014

edit

The Signpost: 24 September 2014

edit

The Signpost: 01 October 2014

edit

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

edit

The Signpost: 15 October 2014

edit

The Signpost: 22 October 2014

edit

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

edit

The Signpost: 05 November 2014

edit

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

edit

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

edit

The Signpost: 03 December 2014

edit

The Signpost: 10 December 2014

edit

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

edit

The Signpost: 24 December 2014

edit

The Signpost: 31 December 2014

edit

The Signpost: 07 January 2015

edit

The Signpost: 14 January 2015

edit

The Signpost: 21 January 2015

edit

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

edit

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

edit

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

edit

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

edit

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

edit

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

edit

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

edit

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

edit

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

edit

.

The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015

edit

The Signpost, 1 April 2015

edit

The Signpost: 01 April 2015

edit

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

edit

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

edit

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

edit

The Signpost: 29 April 2015

edit

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

edit

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

edit

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

edit

The Signpost: 27 May 2015

edit

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

edit

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

edit

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

edit

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

edit

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

edit

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

edit

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

edit

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

edit

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

edit

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

edit

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

edit

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

edit

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

edit

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

edit

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

edit

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

edit

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

edit

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

edit

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

edit

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

edit

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

edit

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

edit

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

edit

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

edit

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

edit

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

edit

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

edit

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

edit

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

edit

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

edit

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

edit

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

edit

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

edit

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

edit

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

edit

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

edit

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

edit

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

edit

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

edit

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

edit

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

edit

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

edit

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

edit

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

edit

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

edit

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

edit

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

edit

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

edit

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

edit

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

edit

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

edit

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

edit

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

edit

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

edit

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

edit

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

edit

Invite to the African Destubathon

edit

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

edit

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

edit

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Tatasport. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

edit

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

edit

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

edit

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

edit

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

edit

Proposed deletion of Songs for the Bhoys

edit
 

The article Songs for the Bhoys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable release, no significant sources, fails WP:NALBUM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jellyman (talk) 16:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Songs for the Bhoys.gif

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Songs for the Bhoys.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

edit

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

edit

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

edit

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

edit

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

edit

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

edit

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

edit

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

edit

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

edit

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

edit

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

edit

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

edit

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

edit

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

edit

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

edit

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

edit

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

edit

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

edit

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

edit

Proposed deletion of Wrap the Green Flag Round Me Bhoys

edit
 

The article Wrap the Green Flag Round Me Bhoys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, one deadlink reference, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 10:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

edit

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

edit

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

edit

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

edit

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

edit

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

edit

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

edit

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

edit

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

edit

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

edit

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

edit

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

edit

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

edit

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

edit

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

edit

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

edit

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

edit

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

edit

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

edit

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

edit

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

edit

Missing

edit

Hi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:37, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply