Hello, Tatsmayer! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 16:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

List of Ukrainian Jews

edit

I've reversed your redirect as I see no discussion and thus no consensus to do so. Also, these look like different lists with different contents. Thanks Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 16:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC) Once again-- seek consensus before redirecting. Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 16:50, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

BNow You are editing warring and acting without consensus. Dlohcierekim 16:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, some content is controversial and should be discussed with other editors before being posted. At least one of your edits, such as the one you made to List of Ukrainian Jews, appears to have gone against established consensus and has been reverted. Please check the article's talk page for discussion about this topic with other editors. If you wish, you can open or continue the discussion there to help establish consensus for your edits. Be sure to check the welcome page to learn more about how Wikipedia operates, and feel free to ask any questions. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

PS -- you have claimed that "no consensus is necessary." At least two editors disagree with you. Therefore, consensus obviously is necessary. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
PPS -- no, they don't disagree with me. They're just being sententious. They haven't made a singular contribution to the argument. Therefore, I ignore them and will continue to unless an argument to the contrary is given. Tatsmayer (talk) 00:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
That you need to obtain consensus to move a long standing article means nothing to you? Dlohcierekim 00:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Another user has started a discussion @Talk:List of Ukrainian Jews where you may present your arguments in favor of the move. Consensus building discussions generally run 1 week. Dlohcierekim 01:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bebold

edit

The process is bebold, revert, discuss. You refuse to discuss and obtain consensus in moving a long standing article. Dlohcierekim 00:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

August 2010

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Ukrainian Jews. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dlohcierekim 01:12, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply