User:TeleComNasSprVen/The Piggy Bank/12¢
This is an archive of past discussions with User:TeleComNasSprVen. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
11¢ | 12¢ | 13¢ |
April 2011
Twinkle matter
{{adminhelp}}
{{tb|Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#Twinkle_matter}}
-- John of Reading (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
"Could someone please remove my name from User:AzaToth/morebits.js? I believe that this thread has resolved the matter. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 10:03, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- I think you'd do better with an {{adminhelp}} request on your talk page. -- John of Reading (talk) 14:13, 1 April 2011 (UTC)"
- How does the thread resolve the issue? --Closedmouth (talk) 06:32, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I would suggest you ask the admin who added you to the list - go to User talk:Magog the Ogre. It would be rather unpolite for us to revert that change without asking him first anyway. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:59, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- How does the thread resolve the issue? --Closedmouth (talk) 06:32, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
re Water Tribe
Done. Wish someone had cross-posted that DRV discussion, though. We should have sorted them all out at once. That's the hazards of a decentralized project, though. If the disambiguation content stays stable for a while, we can consider unprotecting it eventually. Thanks for finding it. Rossami (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
AfD
Hi there,
I notice that one-edit IPs and specially created users, for the purpose it seems, are adding in comments on the Gemma Mewse. I think I've added in as much as I can to the discussion - less is more - more appears desperate; unless it's to refer back to notability guidelines yet again, something that has had little effect so far. I do notice however that notability claims made, although possibly quite true out there, still do not appear to be proved by independent, or any, sources. There is mention of a Matt McDonough as one of a group of notable associates, but he is the only one with a Wiki article. It would be good to have other serious and long-term editors to comment either way. Fingers crossed that an admin can cut through all the fluff. The problem with these things is that if it survives with its now higher profile as an article, teenage gannets will swoop and drop loads of fanpoop and trivia while it being a tad more difficult to edit. Acabashi (talk) 18:01, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hi again. I asked User talk:Derek R Bullamore#Deep end to cast his music expert eye over this one. He is unsure either way but makes an interesting comment about the album (which is not out yet of course). Derek is a great person to consult about all things music, especially referencing. Acabashi (talk) 14:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
It's back - is there any any difference? - No new references. Acabashi (talk) 21:25, 19 April 2011 (UTC)