Thai Cave Person

Welcome!

Hello, Thai Cave Person, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! –Ammarpad (talk) 05:51, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Nicknames video messages

That's what I was looking for. The boys introducing themselves by their nicknames.Thank you. SlightSmile 19:15, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Saman Kunan

As a contributor to Talk:Tham Luang cave rescue#Saman Kunan article you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saman Kunan. Regards, WWGB (talk) 02:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

HELP

@Bbb23: @Bbb23

I am not this person Chris. I am not in New York.

I am a summer worker here. This computer is in the lounge. There is no Chris working here.

Please do not make me lose my job or my recommendation by banning me. I do not want this on my permanent record which would be unjust and sad because I am not Chris. Do not laugh because my employer may very well find out about this ban. It is a serious matter.

I promise never to write in Wikipedia again. Forever. But do not stain my job record. If you must ban me, unban me then ban me again with the remarks "block at the request of user".

PLEASE!!!! I never got into a fight with anyone on Wikipedia and do not know why my permanent record is being attacked. Please! If you help me this way, the result will be the same: I will never write in Wikipedia forever but the result for me will be not a harmed work recommendation or job evaluation.

Thai Cave Person (talk) 16:53, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thai Cave Person (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

please unblock. I promise to never write in Wikipedia forever. I ask this because I may lose my job if I am banned for computer use. I ask for this on compassionate ground and I agree to ban if I ever write again in Wikipedia. Thank you. If you require it, I confess to all misdeeds even though I am not sockpuppet, not in New York, not Chris, but I confess to all this if it is necessary for unblock - (if you look at my writings, my writings are all good, no fights, but I am sorry). Again, I promise never to write in Wikipedia forever if unblocked but really need your compassion to keep my job

Decline reason:

If you plan to never edit Wikipedia, there's no reason to unblock you. You are free to read any article while blocked. And you can't confess while simultaneously denying everything. And if you are indeed a sockpuppet of a blocked account (and we have technical evidence that you are), you won't be unblocked under this account. Yamla (talk) 16:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 16:46, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Saman Kunan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saman Kunan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saman Kunan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts (talk/contributions) 03:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)