Welcome!

edit
Hello, Thazinkoko! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 16:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

June 2018

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Prince Achileas-Andreas of Greece and Denmark shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chris Troutman (talk) 07:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taung Galay Sayadaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RFA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kyaw Htet Aung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lu Min (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Prince Constantine Alexios of Greece and Denmark does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:30, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello Dear, I will noted! Sorry for not understanding!

Thanks God bless u 😇👏🏻 Thazinkoko (talk) 18:38, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Do you understand now? Sorry if I did not explain clearly. If you need any help you can ask me. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:13, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

A kitten for you! Cool wiki feature. Didn't know this before.

Saw Thinkar Nay Htoo (talk) 16:07, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks bro, ေနာက္ထပ္လည္းarticleေတြဖန္တီးပါဦးေနာ္...တပ္ႏိုင္သမွ်ကူညီပါ့မယ္👍🏻... cheer. Emily Khine (talk) 16:17, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

ဟီးဟီး i m a newbie here for request a help from u 💚 Please help and teach me how to create the articles in Wikipedia.Thanks!Victoria tnds (talk) 21:20, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello Emily Khine,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Popular News Journal for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Xevus11 (talk) 18:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Xevus11 Hello dear, i clean up copy vivo, Thanks you ,Emily Khine (talk) 19:08, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Xevus11 (talk) 02:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khun Win Thaung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bago (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emily Khine (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Diannaa and Admins, I am a daily active and extended confirmed editor in Wikipedia. I have created about many pages without copy text and made more than 1200 live edits during past 1 months. Unfortunately my account has been blocked due to unintentional copyright violations. (please note to admin, I have many own write and expanding, fix, wikipedia style rewrite article, one of the most three active user from Myanmar, another are Ko Ko Chit Chit and Phyo WP. I'm everday active for WikiProject Myanmar of English Wikipedia.) Last week, I have received final warning from Diannaa, I'm careful edit But i don't think copied two sentence are will be block. Now I have read the Wikipedia's copyright policy and I will surely follow in the future. My pages and my edits are the good reasons for being unblocked. Please mercy at least a last time.Emily Khine (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

  • What is copyright?
  • How is Wikipedia licenced?
  • Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
  • Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
  • How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yunshui  07:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You received multiple warnings and were (or should have been) aware that even small samples of copy-pasted text can be a problem ("i have copied 3 sentence from website!"). I don't see how copying sentences could possibly occur by accident. Can you please explain how you unintentionally copy-pasted sentences? I think it would also be helpful if you can give us a short summary of your understanding of Wikipedia's copyright policy and of how you'd avoid this problem in the future. Huon (talk) 19:24, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Han Thi) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Han Thi, Emily Khine!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Han Thi.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hey Doomsdayer520, please also review, Angel Lamung. Thanks Emily Khine (talk) 16:15, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit

Proposed deletion of Angel Lamung

edit
 

The article Angel Lamung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Polyamorph (talk) 20:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Angel Lamung for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angel Lamung is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Lamung until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Polyamorph (talk) 21:39, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Block evasion

edit

This user has engaged in block evasion as of May, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 19:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Prince Achileas-Andreas of Greece and Denmark for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prince Achileas-Andreas of Greece and Denmark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Achileas-Andreas of Greece and Denmark (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheLongTone (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply