TheDarkArchon
Resident evil 4 easy mode
editI have read the discussions about resident evil easy mode and I am interested to know, once I finish the game in easy mode can I use the save to play the game again but on a different difficulty and with the same items I had at the end of the game? I am sure other gamers would be interested in knowing this as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romeo Roshan (talk • contribs)
Image copyright problem with Image:Action_doom_box.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Action_doom_box.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Image:Hissy2.jpg listed for deletion
editMany thanks for keeping a watch on vandalism and reverting changes to my talk page.
Best wishes,
Thanks!
editHi there! Thanks for the vandalism revert on my talk page. :) - Alison✍ 15:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. -- TheDarkArchon 16:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Rodney Anoa'i
editWhatsup TDA? So you like to change my good contribution of wikipedia of Rodney Anoa'i? What is your problem? Huh? I did good shit, man! Go clean up your zdoom stuff before coming back here.
hey
editI'm being harrased by that fish guy. i posted a comment on you page and he erased it. hes putting info that isnt needed or wanted on the page. can you help me?
TDA=ZDoom
editWill you rub my sac so I'll give you a Doom wad which was made by Eric Harris? I know you love it.
Do I know you?
editLenny boy, do I know you? Reziac has been quiet on your whereabouts in cyberspace. Hope all is fine, although it's close to Martial Law down here with Bush and the neocons :( Will take a million MBF friends to save us... Check my reverse-DNS if you don't believe me :) 207.70.164.210 03:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
um...you mixed me up with someone else... - TheDarkArchon 03:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:KuKulkan.png)
editThanks for uploading Image:KuKulkan.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Korax, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
The article DeHackEd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TarkusABtalk/contrib 19:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)