I don't want to hear what you have to say. I will, however, read it, and pretend to care. New messages at the bottom, please. - TLB (Tick Tock) (Contribs)

Wows! Likes AWESOMES DUDE! Is u is teh true Ballon of Leddyness? Cos like my friend he says you is not, and it's like me saying YEA HE IS cos only da true TLB could haves soooo much awesomeness and stuffs...
Also... I think this MrN might actually have a go at improving the Uncyclopedia article over here. That page is one of the real "melting pots" of ridiculous Wikipedia bureaucracy and nonsense, and I rather fancy the challenge. How people can have a problem linking to a page on the internet when the article is about that page is just bizarre to me. I'm assuming that all this silly bureaucracy is part of some rather clever "In Joke" amidst regular Wikipedia editors, and hopefully with time I can learn to appreciate the humour. I'm mentioning this as I presume such a divulgate activity as editing this wiki would require formal written authorization from senior management, and as such I am requesting your permission... :P
I have noticed that there are a few places around this crazy wiki where vandals are actually redirected toward Uncyclopedia. I wondered what your views were about that? Surely that goes against just about everything which Wikipedia is meant to stand for? I wonder what would happen if Uncyclopedia redirected it’s vandals towards Wikipedia on a regular basis. Surely we should be sending then to ED. ’’Who?’’ Only joking about that last bit, but I think this redirecting people to Uncyc thing needs looking at. If people are creating sophisticated hoax articles on Wikipedia I can understand them being redirected to Uncyclopedia, that is after all how Uncyclopedia started. If users are obviously general vandals who obviously have no inclination to contribute in a useful manor I feel this is a different matter.
Also, also... HeHe...
Oh, also, also, also, and obviously... Pants. MrN9000 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 11:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Dude, I'm totally that guy you'll thinking I was...?
Also, I think I mentioned that whole vandal redirection to Uncyc when I parodied this thing with this one. - TLB (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Whoa! Look at this place... nice and spacious, plenty of room for comments! =CJK= 23:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Awesome TLB, although I think you mean Uncyclopedia:Wikipedia due to the fact that this is now an Uncyc policy rather than just a random rant stored in userspace with no real support from the rest of the comunity. I might have called it something different considering Uncyc guidelines for constructive flamewars (shall I provide a link), but perhaps your better judgement got the better of you. I think it's awesome that non Uncyc regulars like Otterathome feel able to contribute to Uncyc in such as constructive way. Good on you Otterathome! If only more Wikipedia editors were like that. Also, who is this random guy popping up on your talk page above? Oh, hang on... He's banned. Now I know. HeHe. MrN9000 (talk) 10:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello

edit

do you have an account on uncyclopedia i think i've met you before (Darkspartan4121 (talk) 03:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC))Reply

no. - TLB (Tick Tock) (Contribs)
There's something wrong with your talk page. It has the wrong logo. PuppyOnTheRadio talk 22:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply