User talk:TheQ Editor/Archive Oct-Nov 2014

Adoption

Hi, no one seems to answer whenever I try to find an adopter, but I was hoping maybe you would be around because I saw you were listed? InfernusIsHiding-Talk 18:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

@Infernus: I'd love to! But don't you already have an adopter? But isn't Mirror Freak already your adopter?  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 19:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

@TheQ Editor: Regretfully, he had to drop me because he was told he was not "experienced" enough. InfernusIsHiding-Talk 16:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

@Infernus 780: Ughhh... I don't know. I would give him a chance. But for now, I can oversee the adoption. User:MirrorFreak, is that fine with you? But if you really want to switch adopters, it's fine.  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 20:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

@TheQ Editor: Like I said, he had to drop me and told me to move on for now, as said here, so I am looking to learn to help with vandalism for now.

@TheQ Editor: I finished step 1 a few weeks ago, yet I don't think you have noticed yet, mind checking it? InfernusIsHiding-Talk 16:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Good Article review request

Just noticed your offer to review GA candidates, and I am waiting to hear back on Honda Super Cub. Thanks! Brianhe (talk) 22:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

@Brianhe: Sorry, but my userpage already stated that I am no longer accepting requests as I am very busy. But I'll be sure the first thing I do when I have time is to review that article if another article hasn't already. Cheers,  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 22:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Brauchtisch

Since you are a judge in the GA Cup and I'm in no hurry you don't have to review Brauchtisch's article until after the cup. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 01:00, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

@Jonas Vinther: Thank you. But the GA cup ends like what, next year? The GA Cup did slow the process a bit but I can finish by Tuesday. ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 11:55, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Well, if have the time, then by all means. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 12:35, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

September star

May I suggest to extend the image from the bottom to avoid the cut in the symbol? How about using the other symbols to add more color, with different sizes, and making a perfect star shape? 84.127.80.114 (talk) 16:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

@84.127.80.114: Ummm... I don't know what you are talking about. Can you link to it? Thanks,  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 19:47, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

TheQ Editor made this star for the GA Cup. Is linking a good idea? 84.127.80.114 (talk) 05:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

You mean File:Multiple GA Barnstar.png?

Precisely. It is unfortunate that I will not provide further feedback, since a judge stated that no one will listen. 84.127.80.114 (talk) 01:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mississauga

The article Mississauga you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mississauga for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 21:22, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Robbi Weldon

Hello! Your submission of Robbi Weldon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mindmatrix 18:06, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Running Man Barnstar
		to TheQ Editor, for expanding sport-related articles in the Stub Contest, cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Brian Hill (swimmer)

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Walter Wu

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Walter Wu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NickGibson3900 -- NickGibson3900 (talk) 06:02, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brian Hill (swimmer)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brian Hill (swimmer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NickGibson3900 -- NickGibson3900 (talk) 06:02, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Robbi Weldon

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LauraHale, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Notifying you just in case you weren't already. I hope what they're saying isn't true. — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

This sockpuppetry investigation has been closed; I'll say more about it at the bottom of this talk page. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 18:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

GOCE October 2014 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors October 2014 newsletter is now ready for review. Highlights: Results of the August Blitz and September Drive A few changes around the Guild's pages Sign up for the October Blitz Review the Coordinators election results – Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Pablo Sandoval

Changes addressed; thanks for reviewing this article! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 01:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Username change

Hi,
I was formerly WritingEnthusiast14, but I recently had myself renamed to Biblioworm. I'm signed up for the GA Cup under my old name, so can you please update the relevant pages to reflect my new username? Thanks. --Biblioworm ^{(talk | contribs)} 03:23, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

@Biblioworm: Done ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 15:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Understand

HELLO sir,i read your answer and entered the link that has been provided by you but didn't understand what is stated in the link .would you like to get me the idea?i didn't understand at all. i am also not talking about edit summary .i'm talking just about page.Jojolpa (talk) 00:46, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Far East Man GAN

Hi TheQ Editor. Any chance you could take a look at my replies at Talk:Far East Man/GA2? Sorry – don't mean to rush you – I just want to ensure the review period doesn't time-out, obviously. Thanks! JG66 (talk) 22:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

@JG66: Don't worry, it won't time out. It's good enough to pass, but I don't have time to do it right now. Just giving you a heads up.  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 22:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Baseball AfDs

You're making mistakes all over the baseball AfDs. You should probably refrain from voting until you have a better understanding of things. - Bbny-wiki-editor (talk) 21:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

@Bbny-wiki-editor: I am? How is that so? I think WP:BASEBALL/N says it pretty clearly.  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 21:52, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

You keep saying people appeared in an MLB game who never appeared in an MLB game. BASE/N does not grant notability to bullpen catchers. They need to pass GNG on their own merits. Thanks. - Bbny-wiki-editor (talk) 21:54, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Please see my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Parraz (2nd nomination).--Yankees10 16:52, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Can I get a response here?--Yankees10 16:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

GOCE October Blitz award

		The Minor Barnstar
		Hi TheQ Editor, thank you for copy editing 1,304 words in 1 article during the Guild of Copy Editors’ October Blitz. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:22, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TheQ Editor. You have new messages at Talk:Walter Wu/GA1.
Message added 02:54, 30 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NickGibson3900 ^Talk 02:54, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Chamber of Facets

The above page has just been written by a new editor. To add a non-notable template to a page, threatening with deletion, when it's clearly notable seems a very odd thing to do [1]. Had you bothered to read it, the lead clearly explains why this page is more than notable - it's an important historic building and belongs to a style of architecture almost unique in Russia. I have reverted you [2]. I note you seek to adopt newbies, I hope you ae a little more understanding towards them. Giano (talk) 22:30, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Ditto that. It is a UNESCO World Heritage Site for goodness sake.Charles (talk) 22:56, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

{[ping|Giano|Charlesdrakew}} Thank you Giano for reverting that. I meant to tag it with {{ref improve}} but somehow tagged it with notability issues. The sources provided were in Russian but it was easy enough to identify one of them as a primary source, an unreliable source (from a blog) and one of them is a dead link. I also did not notice it was created by a new a new editor. I probably wouldn't of tagged it for sources and give it a week or two. Thanks,  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 23:49, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

@Giano and Charlesdrakew: Echo did not trigger.  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 11:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Walter Wu

The article Walter Wu you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Walter Wu for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NickGibson3900 -- NickGibson3900 (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

I have reverted this GA pass, as the article is very far removed from actual GA quality. I left comments at the article talk page. Fram (talk) 09:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TheQ Editor. You have new messages at Talk:Brian Hill (swimmer)/GA1.
Message added 00:15, 31 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NickGibson3900 ^Talk 00:15, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Swimming at the 1996 Summer Paralympics – Men's 100 metre freestyle B3

added a link pointing to Christopher Fox

Walter Wu

added a link pointing to Freestyle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!!!

Wilhelmina Will has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween! '"On Psych, A USA Network TV series Episode 8, The Tao of Gus, Season 6, Shawn refers to pumpkins as "Halloween Apples" because he thinks all round fruits are a type of apple. If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

Cheers! "We could read for-EVER; reading round the wiki!" (talk) 17:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

@Wilhelmina Will: Thanks! I was just going to create a template to give to people and then you came! (saves me a lot of work). Have a nice Halloween.  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 18:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello TheQ Editor:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Please comment

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports)#Bullpen_catchers Alex (talk) 21:59, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014: The results

The 2014 WikiCup champion is Godot13 (submissions), who flew the flag of the Smithsonian Institution. This was Godot13's first WikiCup competition and, over the 10 months of the competition, he has produced (among other contributions) two featured lists and an incredible 292 featured pictures, including architectural photographs and scans of historical documents. Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 and 2013 WikiCup champion, came in second, having written a large number of biology-related articles. Casliber (submissions), WikiCup finalist every year since 2010, finished in third.

A full list of our prize-winners follows:

• Godot13 (submissions) wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 181 featured pictures in the final round.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 65 did you knows in the final round.
• Casliber (submissions) wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for four featured articles in the final round.
• Czar (submissions) wins the prize for fourth place
• Sturmvogel 66 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• Bloom6132 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• 12george1 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• ChrisGualtieri (submissions) wins the GA prize for 27 good articles in round 2 and the review prize for 28 good article reviews in round 1.
• Caponer (submissions) wins the FL prize for three featured lists in round 2.
• Sven Manguard (submissions) wins the FPo prize his work on featured portals.
• Figureskatingfan (submissions) wins the topic prize for a nine-article featured topic in round 3.
• ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the news prize for 28 in the news articles in round 3.

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have participated this year. We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup/Submissions/J Milburn

Hate to be a pain, but I think I am owed a couple of bonus points- there were 34 days between the nomination and my closure (though I'm not sure how you are measuring it). J Milburn (talk) 22:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

@J Milburn: Yes, but it only counts if there are more than 30 days between the nomination date and the start of the review. Sorry,  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 22:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

No problem, that makes sense. J Milburn (talk) 08:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

GA Cup points

Hey, TheQ. You scored me 18 points for my recent review of Mauricio González-Gordon y Díez and I believe it was worth 20 as it was on the pink list (Nov 6). Thanks! BobAmnertiopsis∴_ChatMe! 21:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

@Bobamnertiopsis: Oops, my fault. I will change it as soon as possible. Thanks for telling me!  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 21:19, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Ellipsis

I noticed your edit at Falcon's Fury: diff. For my education, I'm wondering if there is a reason the script replaced "[...]" (three periods) with "[…]" (U+2026). According to WP:ADVISOR, it should be changing in the reverse direction (that is, WP:ELLIPSIS says to use three periods). No problem, I'm just curious. Johnuniq (talk) 00:27, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

@Johnuniq: You're right. But advisor didn't do that. I also used WP:AED to do it. I don't really have much time right now but you can switch it back to [...]. Thanks,  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 00:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TheQ Editor. You have new messages at [[User talk:Talk:Brian Hill (swimmer)/GA1#Sorry|User talk:Talk:Brian Hill (swimmer)/GA1]].
Message added 05:08, 14 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sorry about the hassle this may cause. NG39 (Used to be NickGibson3900)^Talk 05:08, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jennifer Jones (curler), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks!

Good luck with your plan, but I warn you, I've created literally hundreds of articles on curlers! :-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 04:25, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Onassis

ArticleName, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 12:01, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

@Gareth E Kegg: I'll try to. Just a little note, next time, be more specific. It took me a while to figure out the article was Alexander Onassis. Thanks,  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 17:58, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

That was hilariously badly written! My sincere apologies.. ;) Gareth E Kegg (talk) 22:15, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

it's me Kristine

Does the category I created Category:People_from_the_Inuvik_Region make sense to you? Can you tell me if it should be deleted? Venustar84 (talk) 18:34, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Just so that there aren't multiple and potentially differing answers to the same question, I responded to this question at User talk:CaroleHenson--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews

Hello TheQ Editor. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Use of the term "homosexual."

Gay rights advocates have been protesting the use of the term "homosexual" for about 40 years, stating that it is homophobic, reflective of the pathologization and criminalization that LGBT people have faced for decades. It is a term for a type of psychosis. Most LGBT people, as well as scholars in the field of gender and sexuality studies, find the term offensive. The preferred terms are gay, gay/lesbian, LGBT, same-sex, and queer.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.115.110.100 (talk) 19:11, 18 November 2014‎

First of all, that was four months ago. But that doesn't really matter. I'm sorry to say I do not know a lot about LGBT related stuff, but LGBT would be the official term. On Wikipedia, we do not censor the content, as stated here. "Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive, even exceedingly so." It doesn't matter if you don't like it. Again, I have almost completely no knowledge on this. You can bring it to a WP:Noticeboard if you want.  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 20:47, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Never mind all that. I was wrong, I looked into some of the sources provided and it uses the term "gay". I am very sorry. Also, you claim that you have a Ph.D which I am not going to argue about. But next time, when you are explaining something, provide sources. Wikipedia is not a place for Original Research and if you provide sources, people would more likely believe and listen to you. Thanks,  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 21:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Actually, Q is right. Like Q said, Wikipedia is not censored. Also, having a PhD gives you no advantage (See WP:EXPERTISE) and you shouldn't go saying you know more than everyone else. Also, look at how many times "homosexual" or one of it's derived words is used at Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies. It's been discussed many times. I'm not going to dig into all of those discussions, but I think if the discussions said that the term was offensive and shouldn't be used, Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies would be the first place to stop using it. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 21:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@AmaryllisGardener: Yes, but if you look at the references, they all use the term "gay" not "homosexual".  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 21:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Well, if the references say "gay", then "gay" can be used, if the ref says "homosexual", then "homosexual" can be used. If the ref says gay, then okay, but that's not the argument this editor's trying to make. All I'm saying is that "The LGBT/gay community finds this term offensive" is not a valid argument. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 21:53, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mississauga

The article Mississauga you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mississauga for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 04:22, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry investigation closed

Hi. I've closed the sockpuppetry investigation that was opened against you on November 3. The evidence presented to suggest that the account LauraHale was your sockpuppet was not sufficiently convincing (in my opinion) to justify taking action.

However, in the course of the investigation, five other accounts were uncovered which were judged (either conclusively or on balance of probabilities) to have been sockpuppets of yours: Billy on Boxes, Joydebbei, TheOther Q, George Mild, and Helloyolo. All of these accounts have been indefinitely blocked.

I would strongly advise you not to create any more sockpuppet accounts, unless you can provide a very, very good explanation of what you are doing and why you need more than one account. The only reason you were not given a block right now is that the above sockpuppets hadn't been used for several weeks, and any sanction against you at this time for these actions would be purely punitive (something which Wikipedia sanctions are not supposed to be). Please carefully read the sockpuppetry policy (WP:SOCK) and make sure your actions from here on are firmly on the "good" side of the line, because any future action by you that seems likely to fall under the sockpuppetry umbrella will probably lead to you being blocked from editing. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 18:44, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for closing the investigation @Richwales:. I have one concern though, I still don't understand why you blocked my other account TheOther Q (indefinitely) though. That's basically the only account I can use to edit Wikipedia on public computers and it is now blocked. That being blocked also performed an autoblock on me. If you could please unblock me, then I could continue working on articles. Scratch that, I probably won't be editing for the rest of the day. But if you could lift the block of TheOther Q, then it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks,  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 19:34, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Fair enough. I've unblocked TheOther Q. I can't find any autoblocks; please contact me with more details if you continue to be autoblocked. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 00:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Advice on Berkhamsted

Hello, I am not sure if you work, time and interests cover Towns and Cities in general. I have been slowly trying to improve the article on the small but very historic town Berkhamsted Herts. I would like to raise its WikiProject Cities status from Rated Start-class, Low-importance to B-class, mid-importance. I put up the article for peer review last week, but it has not been picked up yet, though I have tried to implement the auto=peer review suggestions. The article has not been formerly copy-edited. Any advice or help would be appreciated. -- BOD -- 13:04, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

@Bodney: Sure, I don't have much to do these days. I'll try to help when I have time. I'll probably have enough time on the weekends to do a peer review and light copy edit. Cheers,  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 15:16, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

That would be gratefully appreciated. Thank you :) -- BOD -- 17:28, 25 November 2014 (UTC)