User talk:TheRealHoratioNelson
Add topicLatest comment: 8 days ago by Izno in topic Blocked as a sockpuppet
August 2026
[edit]
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:34, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- who did I attack? Please don't spam me again thank you!!! TheRealHoratioNelson (talk) 22:36, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Please see . Replying to someone that they are editing in bad faith is considered a personal attack. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:38, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- okay sorry I genuinely thought they were. TheRealHoratioNelson (talk) 22:39, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- No problem! The person who loves reading (talk) 22:42, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- does the other user get a similar message? Looks like they're accusing me of being a sockpuppet which doesn't sound like assuming good faith. TheRealHoratioNelson (talk) 22:47, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- I unfortunately cannot find where the accusation is. Opening an WP:SPI case is allowed and is not considered a personal attack, while accusing someone of being a sock elsewhere is generally discouraged. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:51, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- okay understood. Thank you for your patience here. It was a different User anyways.TheRealHoratioNelson (talk) 22:52, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- I unfortunately cannot find where the accusation is. Opening an WP:SPI case is allowed and is not considered a personal attack, while accusing someone of being a sock elsewhere is generally discouraged. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:51, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- does the other user get a similar message? Looks like they're accusing me of being a sockpuppet which doesn't sound like assuming good faith. TheRealHoratioNelson (talk) 22:47, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- No problem! The person who loves reading (talk) 22:42, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- okay sorry I genuinely thought they were. TheRealHoratioNelson (talk) 22:39, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Please see . Replying to someone that they are editing in bad faith is considered a personal attack. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:38, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Heyoboyo. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Izno (talk) 00:32, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.