The Sporadic Update
|
Your edit to List of Hoaxes
editYou did not give a reason when you removed Dihydrogen monoxide from List of Hoaxes. As it was indeed a hoax I have replaced it. Moriori 00:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- I removed Dihydrogen Monoxide from the List of hoaxes because it's already there; go check Hoaxes of Exposure. It wasn't a hoax in the sense that you seem to be saying it is.
- You have demonstrated the necessity for edit summaries. Had you given an edit summary explaining why, I obviously wouldn't have reverted. I have removed it from the Proven Hoaxes section. Moriori 01:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Shall do from now on. Also, sorry 'bout the comment on your talk page; i've never actually had a conversation on talk pages before now. And i forgot to sign, which was awfully dopey. Thanks--The Sporadic Update 01:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- You have demonstrated the necessity for edit summaries. Had you given an edit summary explaining why, I obviously wouldn't have reverted. I have removed it from the Proven Hoaxes section. Moriori 01:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Barney and Friends talk page
editUm, okay.--The Sporadic Update 03:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Boredom. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki 16:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of William Feather
editThe article William Feather has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability: significant RS coverage cannot be found. An article on a minor author tagged "Notability" since 2008.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of William Feather for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Feather is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Feather until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)