The brave celery

Speedy deletion nomination of Josh Bogert

Hello The brave celery,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Josh Bogert for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, User1937, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Reading the advice above will explain how to source the article you created. You will need to provide articles about him from major media sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Since you have continued ot work on this page, I have removed the Spededy Deletion notice. However, to keep the page up you or another editor will need ot find secondary sources, that is, reliable news media or other reliable sources other than the network he works for. Anyone he works for is a primary source. Articles need sources like magazines and newspapers. He does seem to be hot, so the sources are probably out there. And it is a really nice think to wirte articles about stuff tat you enjoy, like a singer. Just, to keep it on wikipedia, someone needs to find reliable sources. Check out Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Cheers. E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Josh Bogert

To be clear, I don't intend to immediately take this article to WP:AfD. (I literally don't have time for that these days...) But it is probable that this is where this likely to end up in a few weeks. Josh Bogert is what we usually describe as being a WP:TOOSOON subject for an article, and it is likely that you and other editors won't be able to find enough Reliable sources about him to justify keeping his article around at this time. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Josh Bogert for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Bogert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Bogert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

The brave celery, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi The brave celery! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Josh Bogert deletion

Please don't attempt to close the deletion discussion of Josh Bogert. First of all, deletion discussions generally run one week and second you did not come close to doing it correctly. Please just let the process run to its normal conclusion in about a week. Thanks. Safiel (talk) 16:50, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: We are Family (children's music video) (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chenzw was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:We are Family (children's music video) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chenzw  Talk  14:29, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Moving and creating pages

You have moved two pages in recent days to misspelled titles, one of which you claimed was because the actor's name was misspelled. However, you did not supply a source for moving Roger Walker (actor) to Rodger Walker (entertainer) (which, since there is no Rodger Walker, would not need the disambiguator to begin with) and searching for "Rodger Walker" and any of the TV shows he acted in gets 0 hits. In the future, please be more careful, use sources, use talk pages, and ask people for help if needed. Yosemiter (talk) 23:59, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Also Martha & Snoop's Potluck Dinner Party already exists and I have redirected your page. Maybe do a wikipedia search before creating an article. Also based on your edit history, I would strongly suggest that you only create draft articles and then submit them for review to see if they meet wikipedia's notability guidelines. By submitting for review you should get constructive criticism and learn to become a more proficient editor and greater contributor to wikipedia. Yosemiter (talk) 04:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

The same applies to your edits overall. You just post your opinions (I'm not even talking about the wrong ones), which don't belong here. – Sabbatino (talk) 09:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

and I reverted your edit at Aquaman (2018 film), Celery. Please stop. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you...

for your contribution regarding the fireworks incident in Mexico. Sorry that the edits got caught up in the move - I wish it was possible to merge that in so that you could get the (well-deserved) credit! Appable (talk | contributions) 01:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for creating 2016 Mexico fireworks incident, and I apologize for how it turned out. I can vouch that you definitely have the credit of creating the article about the incident first. I too wish it was possible to merge the histories. Mz7 (talk) 01:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Inappropriate move

The Reign of the Superman explains in the article that there is no hyphen in the title of the story. This is further explained on the Talk page of the article. It's irresponsible to move an article without checking to see if there's a good reason why it's named the way is. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 15:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

I know it looks like the name is hyphenated because of how it splits on the first page of the story, but it's not. In the table of contents and all throughout the story, the word is clearly Superman with no hyphen (as noted in the article's opening). Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 22:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:DesiArnazJrEvent.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:DesiArnazJrEvent.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 20:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vegas Golden Knights all-time roster

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Vegas Golden Knights all-time roster requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DashyGames (talk) 22:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Kelly (American BBC interviewee)

The article Robert Kelly (American BBC interviewee) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. J947 00:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Kelly (American BBC interviewee)

The article Robert Kelly (American BBC interviewee) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:1EVENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 01:13, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I noticed that you made a change to an article, David Spade, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Chrgd

Your move has been undone, as it violates MOS:TM. ViperSnake151  Talk  02:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Times, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Please stop deleting correctly sourced information. All that was needed was a sub-head. David J Johnson (talk) 12:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Larry King, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 13:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

With ll due respect, please look at edit summary; info is from CNN

"It was there before"

I don't doubt that it was there before.[1] I don't doubt that it might have been there for some length of time. That said, something that should not be there should not be there even if it is or was there.

If someone reverts a change you have made, please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. If there is other material in the article that shouldn't be there, remove it. If you aren't sure, discuss it on the talk page. - SummerPhD^v2.0 14:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Okay, I won't add it again. To tell the truth, I didn't even care it was there in the first place. Didn't think we needed it. Also, I set up a vote concerning a thread on the talk from a few weeks ago about wether or not we should include the "Caillou gets grounded" information.

Thanks. The brave celery (talk) 14:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The brave celery. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Mike Fisher (ice hockey)

Please stop changing his status as you did with your recent edits in Mike Fisher (ice hockey)'s page. Per discussion at WP:HOCKEY it was decided that he is retired until he signs a contract with the Predators. – Sabbatino (talk) 14:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GroverSesameRoadSafetyAmbassador.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GroverSesameRoadSafetyAmbassador.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 220 (Snoop Dogg EP) (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:220 (Snoop Dogg EP) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:220 (Snoop Dogg EP), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 01:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bill Bidwill. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ^{(talk page stalker)} CrashUnderride 01:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

The Rams moving back to LA is fact. The brave celery (talk) 01:52, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Malibu (album), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Have you listened to the record? In fairness, I have not done so in full, but it seems as if you are the only one disagreeing. What specifically do you disagree about? Perhaps we can work something out. Best wishes! The brave celery (talk) 19:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

You can't just change genres like that without adding a reliable source or seek consensus on the article's talk page first. Changing genres that based on your opinion is considered disruptive. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

I can see you've edited the article often. I think your point is valid, and I shan't edit war, in the interest of civility, and the spirit of Wikipedia which is "working together"-based. The brave celery (talk) 19:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

I just saying add content all you want as long it is supported by an reliable source. Keep in mind that genre warriors are frowned upon. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:33, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 9250 Cordell Drive

The article 9250 Cordell Drive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability. Fails WPGNG as sources are mainly passing mentions, no indication of historical significance for the house itself, WP:INHERIT applies

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 23:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Regarding your edit summary when you removed this: PROD's are not discussed. They are for non controversial deletions where no discussion is needed. All you have for sources is real estate listings. Even the one I had hope for, the Variety bit, was an ad. Sources whose purpose is to promote something are seldom notable. It's irrelevant that the Times and Variety are solid for most things. If this article were about a company or person, it would certainly be speedied. Unfortunately, no such mechanism exists for structures. After I do some research to se if this mess can be saved, I may be taking to AfD. John from Idegon (talk) 23:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

I had posted on your talk page but I see you responded here. I understand fully. I don't know if I'd say all the cites were "real estate listings" per se, or advertisements (as it is a private home, not a tourist destination.) but I see your point The brave celery (talk) 23:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 9250 Cordell Drive for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 9250 Cordell Drive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9250 Cordell Drive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 00:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Personal attacks

They are not allowed here. Your edit summary was inappropriate. Please be civil and kind.

BTW, per MOS:BIO, we do not encourage "Mexican American" in the lead. It is not a nationality. If anything, we should have "American", "Mexican" (she has Mexican nationality per Article 30 of the Mexican Constitution, and multiple sources describe her as "Mexican"), or "American-born Mexican" (not my preference, but the usage is technically correct). MX (✉ • ✎) 03:45, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

That truly was not my intent. My deepest apologies. The brave celery (talk) 14:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Roseanne Barr shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 18:41, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Notice of discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Jytdog (talk) 18:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Please let me know of specific issues. This is not entirely clear. Thank you. The brave celery (talk) 19:05, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

I see now it was about Roseanne Barr's YouTube channel. Pardon me. But I hardly think one edit on a living person qualifies as an "interest" in such subjects as you mentioned above. As for the sourcing I won't tamper with it. Thanks. The brave celery (talk) 19:09, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

This is your edit. You cited a primary source (her youtube channel) and you wrote your observations about she does there. You cannot add content anywhere to Wikipedia based on your observations. See WP:OR and WP:PRIMARY. This is especially not OK for content about living people. Jytdog (talk) 19:10, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

I see thanks best wishes The brave celery (talk) 19:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:220 (Snoop Dogg EP)

Hello, The brave celery. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "220".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 09:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Kamikaze (Eminem album) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Strikerforce^Talk 21:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at If You're Reading This It's Too Late, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

hey The brave celery ...cool name and a barnstar for you! File:BillCosbyMugshot2018.jpg great upload.

		The Photographer's Barnstar cheers.!!
		For your work on the Cosby's mugshot taken on the day of his sentencing September 25, 2018 at Norristown, Pennsylvania aNYHOW TOO COOOOL TO SIGN....VIVA Miami.

File:BillCosbyMugshot2018.jpg

BillCosbyMugshot2018...great work:The brave celery

Speedy deletion nomination of Keep on Truckin' (The Conners)

Hello The brave celery,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Keep on Truckin' (The Conners) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TomCat4680 (talk) 02:19, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, The brave celery. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Astroworld (album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to sult your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 12:56, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

It was a technical matter, look in the infobox for the website name. Do not automatically accuse me of making disruptive edits; I do not know how to add refs to an infobox.

That doesn't work that way here, you add sources in articles not just footnotes with website names on them, we don't need to find sources for you. And by the way, Hilltop Views (a college website) is not an reliable source, try to add genres with better sources next time per WP:ALBUM/SOURCE. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 15:17, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Unititled Future album moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Unititled Future album, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 17:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wizrd (January 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 03:18, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Your recent editing history at Issa Album shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

April 2019

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Madame X (album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. You can say whatever and reason all you like in the edit summary. If the genres aren't directly sourced on the article, don't add anything because they will be disputed and removed. Thanks. Ss112 12:13, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Danny Green (basketball) appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 16:41, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

I didn't edit the Dammy Green page; I edited the Paul George page. While I understand your points, this was basically being taken as fact by respected sports commentators at that time, and I don't know whether or not it's become official yet. The brave celery (talk) 17:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Debi Mazar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 19:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by citing your own commentary or personal analysis in verified-content removal at articles, as you did at Mumble Rap, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 16:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Madonna (entertainer). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Elizium23 (talk) 19:10, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Morgan92828818 (talk) 01:44, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

March 2021

Your edit to Pete Buttigieg has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 05:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Commander (dog)

Hello, The brave celery. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Commander (dog), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Goldbergs (season 10), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amadeus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)