The helper5667

Welcome!

Hello, The helper5667, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Tom Jung, 1987.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tom Jung, 1987.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Charles J. Guiteau without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Peaceray (talk) 21:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

J.P. Nestor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, J.P. Nestor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 22:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

The helper5667, I have posted a number of possible sources at Draft talk:J.P. Nestor. All Music is not particularly authoritative, but there are plenty of other reliable sources. Peaceray (talk) 00:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Jabba the Hutt

Hey would you mind looking over Jabba the Hutt again in your FA review because I am trying to stop it from being delisted. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 18:35, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Great Train Robbery

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:The Great Train Robbery (1903).webm, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 03:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edison Exhibition Recordings (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edison Exhibition Recordings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Edison Exhibition Recordings, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 17:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, The helper5667! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 17:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, The helper5667. I have listed 8 references at Draft talk:Edison Exhibition Recordings. I believe that these can be used in the article. Peaceray (talk) 22:28, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Supplementary Section of the "Impossible Voyage" (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Supplementary Section of the "Impossible Voyage" and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Supplementary Section of the "Impossible Voyage", click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Anthology of American Folk Music/GA1

Hi, The helper! I've started a GA review of Anthology of American Folk Music (see Talk:Anthology of American Folk Music/GA1), and got far enough to put it on hold as there is a fair amount of work to do. Because of the lack of sufficient citing to reliable sources, this is close to a quick fail. The prose needs a copyedit. The article could do with better organisation. And it looks like more detailed research is needed. There are other issues as well, such as use of media. Bearing in mind that it needs a fair amount of work needed to bring it up to GA criteria, do you wish to keep the GA Review open (I am a patient reviewer, though I would be expecting reasonable progress), or shall I close it, and you can continue working on it without any pressure from me? And you can nominate it again when you feel it has sufficiently improved. SilkTork (talk) 18:53, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

I have closed the review as not listed. Please continue working on the article. It can be nominated again at any time when you feel that the issues raised in the review have been dealt with. Be aware that nominating again without the issues being properly addressed will likely result in a speedy close. SilkTork (talk) 10:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Talk:Bing Crosby does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 13:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Nominating your sandbox for deletion and then closing the nomination serves no useful purpose. It appears that you are doing it to get attention or as a game. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The helper5667/sandbox

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The helper5667/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The helper5667/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The helper5667/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --ais523 00:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Antoine Henri Becquerel

Hey, are you alright with the alternate I uploaded? I hope I didn't overstep. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8% of all FPs} 12:34, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Casse Noisette Suite (Finck recording)

Hello, The helper5667. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Casse Noisette Suite (Finck recording), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Antoine Henri Becquerel

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Paul Nadar - Henri Becquerel.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:J.P. Nestor

Hello, The helper5667. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:J.P. Nestor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:J.P. Nestor

Hello, The helper5667. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "J.P. Nestor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Garfield Akers

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Garfield Akers you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 20:41, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Edison Exhibition Recordings

Hello, The helper5667. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edison Exhibition Recordings, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Supplementary Section of the "Impossible Voyage"

Hello, The helper5667. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Supplementary Section of the "Impossible Voyage", a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Garfield Akers

The article Garfield Akers you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Garfield Akers for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 01:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Edison Exhibition Recordings

Hello, The helper5667. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Edison Exhibition Recordings".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Supplementary Section of the "Impossible Voyage"

Hello, The helper5667. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Supplementary Section of the "Impossible Voyage"".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:57, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Casse Noisette Suite (Finck recording)

Hello, The helper5667. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Casse Noisette Suite".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Alan Crosland VA5 removal

Would you like me to repost that formatted correctly? _pbp 18:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)