Hi Themillofkeytone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. Here are a few suggestions you might find useful:

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing!

And thanks for the vote on my FAC! Glad to see you're already getting involved. Let me know if you need anything. --Spangineer[es] (háblame) 18:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


Hitler's Religious Beliefs

edit

As far as I know that article was a fork: it was created to try and remove an endlessly controversial section from the Adolf Hitler article, leaving a bare bones description behind. You might also drop a note to the christian User:Str1977. User:Giovanni33 is his atheist nemesis.--Shtove 20:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Dear Mill, I have read your note and understand. However, the actual merge (or identity) of the two articles was undone by Users Giovanni33 and Alienus. Str1977 (smile back) 20:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I support your merger, Themillofkeytone. I don't know why Str1977 insists on keeping the tag there.Giovanni33 00:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Gio, you say one thing but do another! You reverted the version on which Mill's redirect merger was based upon. That's why I reinstated the merger note. Str1977 (smile back) 12:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nope. I did not affect the merger at all. The texts were identical. I just restored the texts that you changed on both places. The merger is correct and thus there is no point to have the tag anymore, which you restored.Giovanni33 05:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yep. You changed the text on which Mill's edits were based, thus invalidating his move. Hence the tag has to remain for now. Str1977 (smile back) 16:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Dear Mill, thanks for your message. Sure, I agree with you. For me, the issue was merely that you thought the merger accomplished and removed the tags. You were right at that moment, but when the content of the Hitler article was changed, this changed. I also agree about cutting the section in the Hitler article while giving a comprehensive treatment in the Religious Views article. Str1977 (smile back) 08:04, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

COTW Project

edit

You voted for Grocery store, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Davodd 23:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

For the speedy feedback on Purple diamonds - I wanted to be bold, but was worried it might be considered rash! Inner Earth 08:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

NeXT

edit

How is this article looking now? Please leave comments on its peer review page. Thanks for your feedback so far. — Wackymacs 14:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've just done some more copy-editing. It would be great if you could help out, thanks for the help so far! — Wackymacs 18:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for that, it helps a lot. I am now working on adding references and any missing information. — Wackymacs 16:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
The Consultants
Adolf (manga)
Operation Desert Storm (game)
Olea laurifolia
Adolf Born
Ligurian Sea
Wah Cantt
Protected areas of New Zealand
Hitler and the Church
Primitive Advent Christian Church
Angela Hitler
Tarawa class amphibious assault ship
Khewra Salt Mines
2nd Light Armored Reconnaissance Battalion
Onager (siege weapon)
Nicholaus von Below
Maltese islands
Hot in Herre
Francesco Raibolini
Cleanup
Provinces of Kazakhstan
Tristan
Gamer
Merge
Twisted pair
Silent Drill Platoon
Executive Order 13158
Add Sources
Great Crusade
Leopold Poetsch
Forge World
Wikify
Trinity Christian Academy
Secrets and glitches in Halo 2
Paul van Riper
Expand
Phoenix (spacecraft)
Simon Wells
Maastricht Treaty

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Muhammad Iqbal

edit

Hi - your suggestions have been implemented. Rama's Arrow 21:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've fixed the reference issues. Could you please take another look, and lemme know if there is anything I've missed? Rama's Arrow 19:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply


Hi - Why did you merge these two? No good reason was given by any user. These two terms deal with two differnt things. An MPA is not always a Marine Reserve.

Apple II series

edit

Hello. Can you do me a huge favor by adding {{fact}} tags throughout this article so I can start adding references throughout? — Wackymacs 22:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Marine reserve

edit

Who made the request to redir marine reserve to marine protected areas? They are similar but not the same. Marine reserves are a type of marine protected areas but a marine reserve has a specific meaning by law in New Zealand. If you agree that we should revert it I will rewrite it from a NZ perspective. -- Alan Liefting talk 05:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

oops.. Just noticed that someone else has contacted you about it. -- Alan Liefting talk 05:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Themillofkeytone. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Themillofkeytone. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Themillofkeytone. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply