Theturdreich12

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Ashfield cum Thorpe has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. BJ^Talk 10:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ashfield cum Thorpe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Muchness (talk) 12:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Pillockk.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Charlesmermannn.JPG. The copy called Image:Charlesmermannn.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 12:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

• Image:Mermancharles.jpg
• Image:Pillockk.JPG
• Image:Charlesmermann.JPG
• Image:Mermancharles (Small).jpg

Thank you. Muchness (talk) 12:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)