User talk:This, that and the other/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

What I want from FurMe

What I want from the FurMe integration is easy access to templates. I don't mind cutting and pasting them it, so long as I don't have to go finding them.

For the FURs: So you know how when I click on TW's XfD button there is a drop down menu with the different types of deletion? Okay so if I'm on a file page, I'd like to be able to click in the TW menu something that says FUR and will open up a pop up with a drop down. The drop down should have all the most common FURs; {{Non-free use rationale}} (general), {{Album cover fur}} (album), {{Book cover fur}} (book), {{Poster fur}} (movie poster/general poster), {{Logo fur}} (logo), {{tl:Video cover fur}} (video/dvd/blueray), and {{Video game cover fur}} (video games). The drop down should default to general, as all the other ones do is make it easier, but general works for all of them. Really, for me, just having the full text for each of those six available in a pop up box, so I can cut and paste it in myself, is fine for me, however I am more experianced in this than many. If you could recapture the previous functionality of FurMe on furs, adapted so that it uses these six rationales instead of the smaller and obsolete selection it previously used, that would be ideal.

For the Licenses: This one I have a very light request for. Because it's one line of template and everyone knows exactly where to put it, all I really want here is for there to be a drop down menu with the most common free tags, non-free tags, and modifier tags. I will personally make a list for you later on this week. When I pick an entry in the drop down menu, I want it to appear, in brackets, as easily copy and paste-able, text in the pop up.

For me, FurMe is a convenience that saves me the time of having to go fetch temples. I know where all the templates are, but many people don't. For them, it provides much more. I suppose other people will have other requirements. I hope you can get it as close to the original functionality (but with new template lists) as possible, but I will readily adapt to whatever you come up with. To me, FurMe is a benefit, not a right, so I really can't complain much with whatever you do.

Thanks for asking for my input. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:41, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

And thank you for the detailed response. I will think about the best way to accommodate the different levels of experience, and different expectations, of those using FurMe. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikibreak

{{wikibreak}} — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm back. — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

FurMe merge

When you get back, can you send me a message with the timeline on the FurMe merge? I'd like to know when I'll have those abilities back. Thanks, Sven Manguard Wha? 20:38, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

AfD test pages

I have zapped Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Test as requested - do you still need Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 99, which transcluded it? JohnCD (talk) 09:36, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for finding that. No, I don't need that one anymore, and have tagged it for CSD G7. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Gone. JohnCD (talk) 10:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

TfD

Hey. Thanks for the message. I've been here for years, and I still can't work out how to correctly nominate two or more pages or templates! I always get it wrong somehow. Thanks for sorting it out :) doktorb _words^deeds 11:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Reply

Nowadays if you look at an actor's biography, the external links section is filled with several expanded award templates, which take up a lot of space on the article. Instead of having one big template for the awards, I created the sub-sections to show the winners of each period - a similar format to that found on the templates of the Oscars, SAG, Golden Globe, etc. Not only would this further help reduce the size of the templates, it would also help the overall template looks more organized. Lastly, if those awards can have separate templates for each period, I don't see the problem for doing the same thing for the Filmfare Awards. I have removed the deletion tag for now. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, This, that and the other. You have new messages at Presidentman's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-controversial2

Hi TT&TO - I've replied at TfD, but the template is still in fairly regular use and serves a completely different purpose from the alternative you suggest. Grutness...wha? 02:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for withdrawing the nom :) I've posted a message about the template at Wikipedia_talk:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace, which I hope is the right place for WP:UW to find out about it! Grutness...wha? 09:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

FURME

I appreciate you are busy on getting the existing FURME functionality working in TWINKLE, but would appreciate greatly if in reimplementing some expanded function was provided,

I had a hand in creating the templates currently known as :

• {{Non-free use rationale audio sample}}
• {{Non-free use rationale film poster}}
• {{Non-free use rationale poster}}
• {{Non-free use rationale video game cover}}

which are not currently in FURME and whose inclusion might be useful. However these templates, in my view may of themselves need some kind of overhaul, so that they can pick up the relevant infobox fields more effectivly.

I'd also like to strongly suggest some kind of 'standard' rationale template be developed for :

• magazine/comic covers as these are not well covered by the existing book cover one.
• Biographical portraits/Images - as I've seen simmilar wording on a number of these used for infobox uses amongst others.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Ah, yes. You've reminded me to work on FurMe.... Sorry for the long wait; but I'm fairly busy in RL at the minute. Hopefully I should make some progress in the next few weeks. I'll consider your suggestions. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:31, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Just an FYI. {{Non-free use rationale film poster}} has been/will be deleted because it was superseded by {{Non-free use rationale poster}}. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 21:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

BAGBot: Your bot request TTObot

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TTObot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 05:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.

Talkback

Hello, This, that and the other. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle.
Message added 22:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nathan2055^talk 22:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Thoughts on criteria?

Energy_saver_with_room_counter

I honestly can't decide on which criteria for CSD. Its not really advertising, but it isnt vandalism either. Thoughts? BTech United (talk) 03:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Do a PROD, because it fails WP:NOTHOWTO, and it's about a non-notable topic (but not one of the subject areas which CSD A7 covers). — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

I couldn't help but notice this discussion while leaving a talkback. If you use Twinkle, you can set custom CSD criteria. This will leave it up to the admin as to which criteria works best. There is a way to do it with template code, but I'm not sure what it is. I'll update the page with the CSD. --Nathan2055^talk 20:09, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks. BTech United (talk) 01:03, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Oops, I made a mistake. While that page was also under G11 (advertising or promotion), WP:NOT is not enough force to generate a speedy deletion. PROD is good for other instances. However, most likely the reviewing admin will fix it and replace it with a PROD. Sorry about that! --Nathan2055^talk 02:44, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Either way, it's gone now. Problem solved, eh? Also, apparently the custom rationale isn't for when you cant find another, which contradicts its reason for existing. EDIT: Apparently it means rather that it isn't for when you can't really provide a reason. The description leads one to believe that it isn't really ever to be used. Twinkle description needs work, perhaps? BTech United (talk) 23:50, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Good point. Now I look back on it, the wording I wrote for the tooltip on the CSD {{db}} tag is indeed ambiguous. What it should say is that {{db}} must not be used simply because you think a page should be deleted, despite there being no applicable CSD criteria. Any suggestions for rewording the tooltip?... — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Perhaps "Custom rationale is for use only when you can not apply the other criteria easily to this article, yet it obviously meets deletion requirements" or something like that, mentioning that its only for use when obvious, yet cant apply the standard deletion criteria easily (due to ambiguity). BTech ^United 02:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, This, that and the other. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle.
Message added Nathan2055^talk. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

It looks like one of my updates turned out to be a glitch! Please take a look. --Nathan2055^talk 02:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

A little surprise for you...

		The Original Barnstar
		For your great service in both building Twinkle and solving problems reported at WT:TW. Thanks! Nathan2055talk 16:23, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

FYI

See discussion concerning your BRFA and proposed bot. –xeno^talk 22:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

AN/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.127.234.159 (talk) 04:33, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

TfD:Template:The Marcoses

I have made two new comments at TfD:Template:The_Marcoses. You may wish to respond. Please note that I intend to lodge a complaint about your actions in relation to this template and a request that your history of article and template deletion is independently reviewed. Rubywine . talk 20:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Please be aware that I have no agenda. Any apparent bias on my part is probably (regrettably) due to the "naivety" you mention in the TFD. I was making the deletion nomination on the grounds of usability only. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:48, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Yet your comments at TfD have been consistently dismissive. You have ignored every issue I've raised. Even now, you continue to push for the navbox to be remade as a family navbox. You may have no agenda, although your actions suggest otherwise. Regardless, this particular case has convinced me that you are reckless and irresponsible about pursuing deletion, and lack the judgement to consider navbox usability in the broader context of the article and the needs of its readers. I am concerned that you may be damaging Wikipedia. Rubywine . talk 19:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

I've opened a topic for discussion here: Wikipedia_talk:Templates_for_discussion#Administrators_please_read. Rubywine . talk 21:32, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Twinkle Tag List

Just wanted to say nice work on the new listing in Twinkle, makes a LOT more sense then it used to. Nice category filter too. Top shelf. BTech ^United 09:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Reply notice

Just wanted to let you know that I replied to your question at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle#Unlink fail. LikeLakers2 (talk) 16:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

New Orleans hackathon in October

Hi, and thanks for your work on Twinkle.

I think you might be interested in coming to the New Orleans MediaWiki hackathon, October 14-16. (Not sure where you live; I know it might be a long trip if you're not already in North America.) We'll be working on infrastructure, such as ResourceLoader, AMICUS, and Wikimedia Labs, that supports gadgets like Twinkle. So it would be very valuable to have script and gadget developers, such as you, there to participate, give feedback, test, and hack. If you're interested, please put your name on the attendees list at that wiki page. Thanks!

And please spread the word about the event! I am trying to reach out to lots of Wikimedia gadget and script developers and maintainers. Thanks!

Sumanah (talk) 17:29, 24 August 2011 (UTC) Volunteer Development Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation

Twinkle question

I've noticed that you are pretty active at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle, so I'll direct my question to you. {{Wikify}} recently had a parameter added to it that allows for more specific directions. However, as much as it is needed, it probably won't catch on unless we get some help from Twinkle and even AWB. How hard would it be to add a dialogue box that pops up every time someone selects {{wikify}} from the "Tag" menu, similar to what happens with {{tl|cleanup))? Ryan Vesey asked here, but that's buried, so I'd like to find out from someone who knows a lot about the subject. Thoughts? Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 19:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Writing the code is surprisingly easy – I shall do so shortly. The hardest part is finding an admin who can sync the gadget file here on Wikipedia. — This, that, and the other (talk) 22:33, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Great! Thanks -- Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 23:19, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Just want to follow up on this - any word? Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 15:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Try it out - I added a {{wikify}} tag yesterday with a detailed reason attached to it. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

That's perfect! Thank you so much. :D Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 18:16, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: Nomination for deletion of Template:Createuser

Hey I've noticed you filed a nomination for deletion of my template. Feel free to delete it. I don't know why I created it years ago. Thanks. --Jackl 09:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:46, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: The article Tegen Roberts has been proposed for deletion

I have updated the article since the concern was raised. Tegen Roberts is famous in the UK and made it into the major UK newspapers. As a gameshow winner and winner of one of the largest amounts given out at anytime on television in the UK. Also being the largest amount given out on any UK Channel for a non-prime time TV show. she gained considerable attention but the nature of her battle with her condition and overcoming it to then go on and win Deal or No Deal (UK game show) captured the hearts of the British people. Michuk (talk) 07:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

The article Tegen Roberts has been rescued from proposed for deletion for the following reasons:

The subject of the article is a well known person in the UK since the Deal or No Deal (UK game show) and this follows precedents already set on Wikipedia for notability after winning a game show. Craig Phillips winner of British version of Big Brother and Judith Keppel who won Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? (UK game show). The perception of notability of a person should not be limited by users who are not resident in the terrority where said notability is known and accepted. Both these notable people have share the distinction of winning the top prize in a televised gameshow. And are mentioned in articles for the corresponding gameshow. Michuk (talk) 08:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michuk (talk • contribs)

OK, then. All is well. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the prompt reply, I'm pleased the article can stand. Michuk (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Twinkle Preferences

Hi, the code for the TW PREFS panel currently contains:

if ((mw.config.get("wgPageName") === "Wikipedia:Twinkle/Preferences"

But this doesn't work when the code is copied to other wikis(due to localization of namespace). It took me a while to figure out that this was why the prefs panel wasn't working on hi-wp.(I'm not js--savvy.) Wouldn't it be easier for other projects to copy if this was replaced by:

if (((mw.config.get("wgNamespaceNumber") === 4 && mw.config.get("wgTitle") === "Twinkle/Preferences")

Thanks--Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 08:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

It would make it easier. I'll look into it.

As you have probably realised, Twinkle was unfortunately not written with project cross-compatibility in mind. A lot of other projects have a stale copy of Twinkle sitting around, most of them not working very well... I'm impressed to see that Hindi Wikipedia is taking the initiative to localise Twinkle, and I would appreciate any feedback on the import and localisation effort. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:31, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you from the hindi wikipedia for the compliment. However, you are right. Twinkle isn't written with cross-project compatibility in mind. There are stale copies of twinkle. Even the effort on hi is so far limited to UI and template translation only. No changes in code or module have taken place since AzaToth put version v2.0-17-ga2cdabc(3 june 2011) on hi. Although I have been planning to update it once the translation is complete, the biggest challenge that I(and probably others in similar situations) face is not knowing which updates to apply(as in which are en specific, and which aren't).

I'd be more than happy in providing feedback(detailed or brief, as you like). I've also been thinking that if developers here were interested, it shouldn't be tough in making a cross-project version of twinkle(I may be horribly wrong in this). I think I have some ideas for it, but not the coding skills. We can talk more about it if people are interested in making such a version of TW.--Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 12:52, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Twinkle Updates

I wanted to let you know that I've got my Twinkle development environment all set up and connected to GitHub. If you have any changes that need to be pushed to the wiki, let me know and I'll be happy to do it. Thanks for all of your hard work! Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle) 13:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks very much! Amalthea and AzaToth seem to be semi-active at the moment, so it will be good to have another willing party to do this.

Note that Amalthea modifies the edit summary used by the Python script whenever he syncs the gadget, so that it mentions all the changes that were made to the repo since the last sync (within 255 characters, of course). See the gadget file history.

Is there any chance you could help me out with two things: (1) synchronise the gadget file again; and (2) take a look at User talk:Amalthea#No, not the repo this time.., which is a request related to Twinkle? — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Done and done! How close is the template removal feature to completion? Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle) 14:40, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

I haven't started yet, because I needed to know if those HTML classes were going to be applied before I could do anything. But now I can start in earnest. Thank you again. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Burma templates

The best thing would be to get the township templates all dabbed and then start some of the most notable settlements and hide the other red links. There is nothing wrong with a few red links but I agree that many is exccessive. The best thing is to do what I have done with the template you placed at AFD right now. If you help with the dabbing of all of the templates I'll then hide the red links so the templates only have the existing articles in them.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:58, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Again we run into the same issue: how do we know which settlements are the most notable? As we well know, information is scant. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:35, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Google maps identifies those villages which are substantial in comparison to those which are barely more than farms. Please consider withdrawing your nomination, it doesn't stand a chance of being deleted.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

I have done so. I shall not nominate any more Burma templates. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Appreciate you removing the TFD. Cheers! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, This, that and the other. You have new messages at Calabe1992's talk page.
Message added 00:28, 6 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Calabe1992 (talk) 01:23, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

DNB templates

I am now faced with the situation where attribution for articles by J. W. Clarke have been changed to John Willis Clark. Of course this would have been trivial with the templates in place. Perhaps you would undertake the change. Rich Farmbrough, 23:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC).

Yes: some sort of error appears to have been made when the templates were substituted, as is evident here. I'm assuming John Willis Clark did not in fact sign under three differnt sets of initials? I suggest you instead contact Plastikspork or SchuminWeb, as I don't know what exact process was undertaken to achieve the substitution. If this is indeed a mistake, it will take some effort to repair it. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:31, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Destroyer of Twinkle Barnstar
		Thank you for the break from recent changes patrolling! You're my hero! Now I can actually go to bed... WikiPuppies! (bark) 05:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Beceni, Buzău

You may be interested in this deletion review. Thank you. Frietjes (talk) 16:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Still notifies for G6

See here. LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 19:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Not for me, it doesn't. I just tried to CSD-tag your twinkleoptions.js file, and it added an entry to my userspace log, but it didn't tag the page (obviously), and nor did it notify you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Well, lets try this. You create a test page in your userspace, and when I get home (if its created before I get home), I'll try tagging it for G6, to see if it'll still notify you on my end. If it doesn't, shall I try tagging for U2, U3, and all G csd criteria g5 to g9? Just to see if they will all try to notify.

If it does, we could try creating an anchor template that will auto-include the ifexist function and the subst for {{db-csd-notice-custom}} and the four tildes. Then we could try removing the four tildes from the message that it would use, and remapping the template it uses to the anchor template. (probably need to reword this to make it understandable)

Does that sound good? LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 16:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Not really, since this problem seems to be affecting only you.

Anyway, you can test with User:This, that and the other/Speedy tag sandbox (which I created, and which instructs admins not to delete it). — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:34, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Twinkle suggestions

Hi. I don't want to clutter the Twinkle talk page with this because (for the moment) I think its best to let the bug reports have priority there, so I hope you don't mind me making some suggestions here. The new Twinkle interface is a massive improvement over what it used to be, but there have been comments that the lists of uw templates in the Twinkle dropdown are too long now to permit an easy overview and a quick choice. This isn't a problem with Twinkle, it's a problem of people who write new templates and ask you to add them to Twinkle. I've already mentioned somewhere that I now actually find it quicker to type custom messages or paste ones I made myself rather than hunt through the list at Twinkle.

A very quick remedy would be to provide mouseover tooltips previews of the templates. You went halfway with the new Twinkle interface by offering a 'preview' button, which is a very useful addition, but it's not quite the same as a shortcut for choosing the template, it's more useful for previewing any manually typed additions to the template before it's finally posted.

Another additional quick solution would be to offer a feature in Twinkle prefs for users to customise their Twinkle lists.

Steve is currently running experiments with templates, including some stats about their use, but I feel again that this is an issue that should also take note of empirical reports; for example, I'm an extremely busy editor and use Twinkle a lot, but there are a great many uw that I have never had occasion to use. I might go through them all, and make a list of the ones I believe to be superfluous and/or redundant at least to to Twinkle.

Your thoughts on these suggestions would help towards the development of the completely new control panel for new page patrollers. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm... what's this NPP panel? Sounds interesting.

I totally agree that twinklewarn needs an overhaul. My first idea was to add subheadings in the dropdown list of templates (uw-vandalismX and uw-disrputiveX at the top, and the rest under headings like "Behavior in articles", "Files and uploads", etc.) This would be a first step to improving the process of choice, as I did when overhauling the Tag module. I also had an idea to replace the top dropdown (General note, Warning, etc.) with a row of toggle-buttons with a modern look. The challenge in all of these proposed renovations is to improve the experience for all users without hindering the workflow of experienced users (i.e. a "wizard" would not be introduced, because it adds too many clicks to the process - indeed, Microsoft isn't so keen on wizards anymore, probably for this reason).

Unfortunately, pop-up preview is a bit difficult to implement (not impossible, just very difficult!) - I would welcome any other suggestions. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Well, I use tooltips easily enough on sites I build, but there may be stuff about the Twinkle code I don't know about. How about making it possible for users to set their Twinkle prefs for the ones they want displayed? One feature that I very much appreciated was the new ability you made for users to include their own custom templates - I use that a lot, so making a pref list shouldn't be too hard to code up. You could start, for example by offering a default list of the most common ones, and let them select others to add to it. I'd make that default list for you , if it helps. In the early start of such a system there would of course be complaints from two out of a million users who can't find the obscure template that only they use, but I think we're used to that ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:49, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello This, that and the other! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I shudder to think what people would read without your maintenance work. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 13:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, This, that and the other. You have new messages at Mabdul's talk page.
Message added 10:59, 5 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

mabdul 10:59, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, This, that and the other. You have new messages at Mabdul's talk page.
Message added 12:51, 5 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

mabdul 12:51, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks

Thank you for this. Yes, it now seems fine again. Trafford09 (talk) 21:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

thanks!

!— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 14:28, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Bugzilla request to enact the consensus found in this closure

Would you take a look at my reply at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Bugzilla request to enact the consensus found in this closure? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Userbox

I got the message! Thanks for fixing my mistake :-) Benzband (talk) 15:45, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Uniblue

Hi ThisThat, I would like to tell you thank you again. I removed the biased sentence, you were right on that :) . If there are any further changes you would like me to make i would be more than happy to do so Keithmonti (talk) 10:36, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi This, that and the other. I further cleaned the uniblue article as you requested. Do you think it requires further toning down or can i remove the Advert Tag? Thank you Regards Keithmonti (talk) 10:35, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi This, that and the other. Will do, ok thank you Keithmonti (talk) 11:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Closing at Tfd

I saw you closed some discussions at Tfd. I don't know whether you do this regularly of late, but you should really not close discussions before the end of the mandatory week for discussion. Especially if there have been only two comments, as in those cases I saw. (November 22)

On a related note. Redirecting is a very (read: too) simple solution. Would be better to replace the instances and then redirect (or delete).

That said, I greatly appreciate your efforts. Debresser (talk) 07:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

It's not usual for me to close TFD discussions. There were two reasons for my closure:

1. I would have boldly redirected these templates without going to TFD, had I cone across them in my travels (or had I been the nominator of the TFD);
2. There was no opposition to the idea of redirection, and I could not think of a plausible reason not to make this choice.

In future I shall consider these cases carefully before performing the close. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, for being conscientious about your edits. I don't oppose the redirects themselves, but do think that replacing the templates and then redirecting would be even better. I did this since then, of course. On a general note, I am happy to see new faces at WP:TFD. Happy editing, Debresser (talk) 15:30, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Redirect loops

Per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Special:DoubleRedirects do you still need the test redirects listed here? Rich Farmbrough, 14:23, 27 November 2011 (UTC).

Yes please. They are useful for testing the API. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

User:CBM/ratemath.js

Thanks for updating User:CBM/ratemath.js for me. I copied your code to that location. I had trouble with the actual link in p-cactions; it was not running the script when clicked. I redid the addPortletLink call [1] and that seems to have fixed it, if I load the morebits script first. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Devil's Throat

Its fine. I Just thought since it has its own article in spanish and portuguese that it needed one in English. Thanks for the review though.Im new on this--Scoobynaiter123 (talk) 03:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Self redirect

Thanks for the comment I missed that and have now created it again with the correct re-direct, you would have thought the tagging and deleting editors would realise it was a mistake and ask me! MilborneOne (talk) 10:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

You would have thought. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In James Oswald (Glasgow), you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Mill, Whig and Abstract (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Gleah! Thanks, bot. I'll fix them. It was a quick wikify job. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Articles for creation/Chief Architect Software - A7 Speedy Deletion

Hello TTO, I wanted to get in contact with you regarding the latest review you provided for a page I created - Chief Architect Software. The article has been rejected several times - each time I've gone back through and tried to remedy the reviewer's issue with the article. I think I've done as well as I can. However, I just don't understand the A7 rejection. In the world of 3D CAD software, Chief Architect has a relevant presence. There are numerous other articles about other CAD programs that have been allowed to be created. Those other articles are poorly written (in some cases), some have no references, one page consists of nothing but a link. Yet these other pages have been allowed to be created. Here are 3 examples of CAD software pages that have been allowed for creation:

• Sweet Home 3D
• Punch! Software
• 3D Home Architect

The Chief Architect page I create has much more content and citations than any of the above. Forgive me, I'm just frustrated at the Wikipedia process that allows these bare bones articles to be created but rejects mine when it has significant content and references. Can you please help me understand the A7 rejection? I think this page deserves to be created. Thank you, Skieridaho (talk) 18:27, 8 December 2011 (UTC)SkierIdaho

You raise a good point. I agree that your page is better than those articles you mention. But those articles were never "accepted", people went ahead and created them directly in the main article-space. I don't really think they should exist either; I'm going to nominate one for deletion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punch! Software, and we'll see what other Wikipedians think. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

User:This, that and the other

CAD software has become paramount in the field of design. Professionals don't spend forever drawing things out by hand anymore - they use software. There are numerous software packages out there aiding in that endeavor and are significant in their effect on the design field - Chief Architect is one of them. The other software pages I cited have not been done well - given the chance, the Chief Architect page will be (and perhaps more on the topic of CAD software). I still do not agree with your nomination for an A7 deletion for Chief Architect Software. This product (and others like it) have a significant presence and effect on the field of professional design. 207.88.114.211 (talk) 17:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)SkierIdaho — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skieridaho (talk • contribs) 17:01, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

The boilerplate message links to the general notability guideline. It requires "reliable, independent (third-party) sources (e.g. online news articles or professional reviews) providing significant coverage of the topic". That is what you need to allow the article to be accepted. You've put a lot of work in, so it would be disappointing if the article was deleted, but sadly I fear Chief Architect may simply not have the required coverage. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Recently the article for creation The Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Medicine Podcast was rejected can you help?

I have been asked often about why I dont have a wikipedia article of my podcast. I was asked this a month ago when `I was asked at the main meeting of the `International Atomic energy agency in vienna where I was nominated by my country Australia as a delegate because of the podcast. The podcast is the longest running (serious) medical podcast and people look to wikipedia to have information and a 3rd party information. What do I need to do to make this article about my podcast worthy? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/The_Nuclear_Medicine_And_Molecular_Medicine_Podcast — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.215.88 (talk) 19:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, This, that and the other. You have new messages at Rich Farmbrough's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

That talkback is superseded by the discussion I opened at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#Bold.2C_revert.2C_discuss. Debresser (talk) 13:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Green Versace "jungle" dress of Jennifer Lopez, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Chiffon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

 Done — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Restoration of deleted User:This, that and the other/sandbox

 Done JamesBWatson (talk) 10:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	Thanks so much for the new MtC program. I have already installed it and it's even better than CommonsHelper 2! ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 01:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm glad you like it! — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Adminship

So I'm making an introduction. Won't be ready till tomorrow. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 01:45, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Not now, thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

I would also be wiling to serve as a nominator for you --Guerillero | My Talk 18:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Look at this pie-chart (particularly the minimal articlespace contributions). How much opposition would that generate? A huge amount: there is no evidence that I know content policies and guidelines (which is quite true: I don't really). Then take a look at this one. Most of those are {{wi}} redirects. Enough said. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:31, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

There are already some sysops that have minimum contributions to namespace 0 (article). ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 20:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

For the Common Good questions

Hello This, that and the other, when logging into your tool, it prompts for a username and password and mentions that it will be saved to disk. If I enter this, where does it save this file, and will I be able to delete that file. (Note: I use WIN XP). Thank you, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 16:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

It saves the login info in the same folder as the program is saved, to a file called "ForTheCommonGood.cfg" (so long as you run the program by double-clicking its icon - if you open it from a web browser after downloading it, who knows where it will end up). Very easy to delete if you wish to do so (although FtCG will recreate it again the next time you run it and enter your credentials).

Merry Christmas. — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. I must say your new tool is extremely efficient. You quartered the time it takes to transfer a file to commons with this wonderful tool. It is well designed and extremely easy to use. Thanks for the work you put in to making this. Best, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:11, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

FtCG

Thanks so much for the reducing number of clicks needed to move file to commons! Bulwersator (talk) 08:59, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Circular redirect

• User:This, that and the other/circular redirect1
• User:This, that and the other/circular redirect2
• User:This, that and the other/self redirect

Do these pages have a purpose. Test wiki is what you want to use I think. :)

-- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 03:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

They do have a purpose: for testing the part of Twinkle that interfaces with the API. As these scripts are only designed to function on this wiki, these pages must be kept here. Please leave them. Thanks, — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:30, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Ah I see. What exactly is being tested? I am very interested in a joint effort against self and circular redirects. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:43, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

How morebits.js handles these obscure types of redirects. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thanks, This and that, for making me feel welcome at Wikipedia. I really appreciated the nice cookies you left on my doorstep on Christmas Day. Simple gestures like these go a long way towards making newcomers like me feel at home at Wikipedia. Thanks for the important work that you do! Fabrice Florin (talk) 02:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Re:Mail

Re:Mail

Thanks! Bulwersator (talk) 13:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Local uploading

Hi, I reverted this edit. All free images should be uploaded to Commons, also user page images. We even have a template for that, see Commons:Template:User page image. Multichill (talk) 12:08, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

OK. I can understand that. I was (quite obviously) under the impression that personal images should remain locally... so thanks for letting me know. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Dapili

The thing that concerned me was that Jojofi kept coming back and doing the same thing over and over again at completely unpredictable intervals, and a request was posted to his or her talk page to stop doing it but it kept happening anyway. It's also important to realize that indefinite protection isn't permanent protection; except in a few rare really severe cases, the protection will always be taken back off within a couple of months anyway. Bearcat (talk) 18:03, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Source code of FtCG

Is it possible to update it to 1.0.2? Bulwersator (talk) 12:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Sure is; will do. I'll try to remember to update it more regularly. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I have certain small ideas to increase speed of my description processing. Bulwersator (talk) 06:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

When writing FtCG, I certainly didn't have speed at the forefront of my mind - it's pretty easy to code sloppily in C#! If you manage to make any improvements, please let me know and I would be happy to incorporate them. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I tried to change something using Visual C# 2010 Express (on Win7) but unfortunately generated exe (from unmodified code) crashes with "You must provide a request body if you set ContentLength>0 or SendChunked==true". So - What is your IDE? Bulwersator (talk) 06:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I use Visual C# Express 2008. In my view VS 2010 is worse than 2008. But I do have C# Express 2010 installed on another system, so I will test it there and report back to you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

So I will try 2008 version Bulwersator (talk) 07:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I've got it... You need to change the Target Framework to .NET 2.0. This is done via Project menu > ForTheCommonGood Properties... (last item) > Application tab > Target Framework dropdown. (I'm exploiting a loophole in 2.0 to work around another apparent bug in 2.0... the joys of .NET!) — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Bulwersator (talk) 07:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

It is not working with version 1.3 Bulwersator (talk) 17:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Also in Visual C# 2008 i received "Error 1 'GetApiUri': cannot declare instance members in a static class C:\Users\User\Documents\Visual Studio 2008\Projects\ForTheCommonGood\MorebitsDotNet.cs 33 24 ForTheCommonGood Bulwersator (talk) 17:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)"

? Bulwersator (talk) 07:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Is it possible to update it to 1.0.2.1? (I use patched version) Bulwersator (talk) 08:51, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Whoops, missed this one. Well, obviously, you can't define instance members in a static class; it's a great sin of .NET programming. In all seriousness, I suspect this was an error in the source which I uploaded to the server, and then I subsequently noticed the error and fixed it in my local version. Try making the member static and see what happens. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

I'll upload 1.0.2.2 in an hour or so :) (I really need to write a script that automates the upload process.)

Just out of curiosity, are you willing to let on what your patch consists of? — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

2 hacks (see in edit mode, as nowiki tag removed newlines):

adding en template to existing description: from else { text = "== {{int:filedesc}} ==\n" + text; } to else { text = "== {{int:filedesc}} ==\n" + text; if (!text.Contains(@"{{en")) { text = Regex.Replace(text, @"\|\s*Description\s*=\s*(.+)\s*\|", "| Description = {{en|1=$1}}\n|", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase); } } and my infotag is different (filling author field with "Original uploader: "... and date with "{{original upload date}}: <date>") to avoid pointless copy-paste (this one may be dangerous to enable as default, as sometimes it possible/necessary to fill author/date with different data): var uploader_link = "[[:en:User:" + iis[iis.Count - 1].Attributes["user"].Value + "|]]"; var infoTag = @"== {{int:filedesc}} == {{Information |Description = {{en|1=}} |Date = " + (exifDate != null ? "{{ISOdate|" + exifDate + "}} (from metadata)" : "{{original upload date}}: " + FormatTimestamp(iis[iis.Count - 1])) + @" |Source = {{own}} <!-- change this if not own work --> |Author = " + (selfLicense ? (uploader_link) : "Original uploader: " + uploader_link) + @" |Permission = |Other_versions = }} ";

Bulwersator (talk) 10:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

In 1.0.2.2, {{en}} is added automatically like you have done there; I wrote a very similar regex :) Also that stupid "I ... created this work entirely myself" phrase gets replaced with {{own}}. I will upload it soon (don't know what happened to that hour...) — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

deployment

Hi, if you make a list of extensions to install I will do it, thank you! Petrb (talk) 09:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

I thought Vector extension wasn't installed, but it just need simplesearch turned on (is the watchlist star icon part of this extension? if so, could you please turn it on as well?). Also Gadgets has been set up since I last checked. Those were the main two. Thanks for that. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Fred Gandt/sandbox/templates/Embed feedback dash

Looks like the only links to the page are to user pages that watch for CSD's. Am I right? The only other link is to a discussion page where I originally proposed the idea. It fell flat on it's face though. Aww. fredgandt 02:08, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Philosopher was transcluding this page and hence showing up in the CSD category, so I thought there might be other uses. But it turns out there weren't. I subst'd the use on that talk page, so now it is orphaned. Sorry about this; it can certainly be deleted now. — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

No problem at all. Thanks for sorting my mess out there. It was an idea that went nowhere, so I figured during my cull of scripts, I could clear out a couple of other failed ideas. Anyhow, all dead and buried. I better go and explain to Philosopher, why his template isn't working (I completely forgot he had adopted the idea (the only one who did)). fredgandt 03:23, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

(I prefer TTO; after all, we don't speak of the CoIS or NAftAoCP.) — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok, TTO. TTFN. LOL! fredgandt 05:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your reports on deployment

I'm wondering if you are still seeing problems with the wiki. Could you give us new reports on http://deployment.wmflabs.org/auth/wiki/Problem_reports ??

French ready

So firstly, I take it that what starts by "#" is not to be translated (or prepared with local wiki information), so here is the file for the French Wikipedia. It would be harder to email you with the document because you can't attach anything.

Code for FtCG. (fr)

# For the Common Good # Local wiki data for YOUR WIKI NAME HERE # This should be the web address of your wiki, without ".org" LocalDomain=fr.wikipedia # Three preset categories to appear at the top of the window # If you don't have three, just remove the unneeded ones Category1=Images pour Commons DefaultCategory=1 # The name of the "Category" namespace on your local wiki, without the colon # (since the English name "Category" works on all wikis, you don't need to include # it here - FtCG handles it) CategoryNamespace=Catégorie # The local name for the "now Commons" template, indicating that the local copy of # an image should be deleted after transfer NowCommonsTag=Image sur Commons # IMPORTANT: All entries from here onwards are treated as regular expressions. # For normal text entry, this should not be a problem, but when using # symbols like ( ) [ ] ? * + | etc., please prefix with a backslash: \( \[ etc. # Local equivalents of the {{information}} template and its parameters # (put the local name SECOND, e.g. Information=Ergojduhd) Information=Information Description=Description Date=Date Source=Source Author=Author Permission=Permission Other_versions=Autre_versions # Section headings in use on the local wiki # (put the local name SECOND, e.g. Summary=Quofkokvej) Summary=Description Licensing=Licence Licensing=Publié sous licence(s) # As there are two headings for licensing, I have put Licensing= two times. # The regular expression used to detect "Copy to Commons" tags # This one is for English Wikipedia CopyToCommonsRegex={{Pour Commons|pourCommons|Image pour Commons[^}]*}}\n? # If you aren't technically confident, stop here and delete everything from here to the end # (FtCG will still work!) # Potential problems - conditions which may prevent or affect transfer (like deletion templates) # Notes: - Use IfContains= to search for a string of plain text (case-insensitive) # - Use IfRegex= to match against a regex (case-insensitive) # These should be listed in order of importance - most "problematic" first. [PotentialProblem] IfContains={{Suppression Immédiate Message=Le fichier est marqué pour la suppresion immédiate. # ... put as many potential problem sections as needed # Replacements to carry out # LookFor is a regular expression; ReplaceWith is a "replacement pattern" # where $n is the nth "capture" of the regex; for help, # visit MSDN or ask User:This, that and the other # %%OriginalUploader%% and # %%InterwikiLinkPrefix%% are special variables supplied by FtCG [Replacement] LookFor={{Art Libre}} ReplaceWith={{FAL}} # ... put as many replacement sections as needed # Replacements of self-license tags, like PD-self, GFDL-self # These use the same format as "Replacements" above [SelfLicenseReplacement] LookFor={{Domaine public par auteur([^\}]*)}} ReplaceWith={{PD-author|%%OriginalUploader%%|en}} [SelfLicenseReplacement] LookFor={{GPL([^\}]*)}} ReplaceWith={{GPL|%%OriginalUploader%%$}} [SelfLicenseReplacement] LookFor={{GFDL([^\}]*)}} ReplaceWith={{GFDL-user|%%OriginalUploader%%|en$1}} [Replacement] LookFor={{CC-BY-1.0}} ReplaceWith={{Cc-by}} [Replacement] LookFor={{CC-BY-2.0}} ReplaceWith={{Cc-by-2.0}} [Replacement] LookFor={{CC-BY-2.5}} ReplaceWith={{Cc-by-2.5}} [Replacement] LookFor={{CC-BY-3.0}} ReplaceWith={{Cc-by-3.0}} [Replacement] LookFor={{CC-BY-SA-1.0}} ReplaceWith={{Cc-by-sa}} [Replacement] LookFor={{CC-BY-SA-2.0}} ReplaceWith={{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} [Replacement] LookFor={{CC-BY-SA-2.0 FR}} ReplaceWith={{Cc-by-sa-2.0-fr}} [Replacement] LookFor={{CC-BY-SA-2.5}} ReplaceWith={{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} [Replacement] LookFor={{CC-BY-SA-2.5,2.0,1.0}} ReplaceWith={{Cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} [Replacement] LookFor={{CC-BY-SA-3.0}} ReplaceWith={{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} [Replacement] LookFor={{CC-BY-SA-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}} ReplaceWith={{Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}} [Replacement] LookFor={{CC-zero}} ReplaceWith={{Cc-zero}} [Replacement] LookFor={{Domaine public perso}} ReplaceWith={{PD-self|%%OriginalUploader%%$}} [Replacement] LookFor={{Document domaine public}} ReplaceWith={{PD-old}} [Replacement] LookFor={{Domaine public expiré}} ReplaceWith={{PD-old}} [Replacement] LookFor={{Domaine public inéligible}} ReplaceWith={{PD-ineligible}} # ... put as many as needed

Code for FtCG. (ko)

# For the Common Good # Local wiki data for YOUR WIKI NAME HERE # This should be the web address of your wiki, without ".org" LocalDomain=ko.wikipedia # Three preset categories to appear at the top of the window # If you don't have three, just remove the unneeded ones Category1=위키미디어 공용으로 이동이 필요한 자료 DefaultCategory=1 # The name of the "Category" namespace on your local wiki, without the colon # (since the English name "Category" works on all wikis, you don't need to include # it here - FtCG handles it) CategoryNamespace=분류 # The local name for the "now Commons" template, indicating that the local copy of # an image should be deleted after transfer NowCommonsTag=now Commons # IMPORTANT: All entries from here onwards are treated as regular expressions. # For normal text entry, this should not be a problem, but when using # symbols like ( ) [ ] ? * + | etc., please prefix with a backslash: \( \[ etc. # Local equivalents of the {{information}} template and its parameters # (put the local name SECOND, e.g. Information=Ergojduhd) Information=라이선스_갱신_알림 Description=설명 Date=날짜 Source=출처 Author=만든이 Permission=저작권 Other_versions=기타 # Section headings in use on the local wiki # (put the local name SECOND, e.g. Summary=Quofkokvej) Summary=파일의 설명 Licensing=저작권 # The regular expression used to detect "Copy to Commons" tags # This one is for English Wikipedia CopyToCommonsRegex={{위키미디어 공용으로 이동 필요 편집하기}}\n? # If you aren't technically confident, stop here and delete everything from here to the end # (FtCG will still work!) # Potential problems - conditions which may prevent or affect transfer (like deletion templates) # Notes: - Use IfContains= to search for a string of plain text (case-insensitive) # - Use IfRegex= to match against a regex (case-insensitive) # These should be listed in order of importance - most "problematic" first. [PotentialProblem] IfContains={{삭제 신청 Message=이 틀에 삭제가 신청되었습니다. # ... put as many potential problem sections as needed # Replacements to carry out # LookFor is a regular expression; ReplaceWith is a "replacement pattern" # where $n is the nth "capture" of the regex; for help, # visit MSDN or ask User:This, that and the other # %%OriginalUploader%% and # %%InterwikiLinkPrefix%% are special variables supplied by FtCG [Replacement] LookFor={{orphan image.*}}\n? ReplaceWith= # ... put as many replacement sections as needed # Replacements of self-license tags, like PD-self, GFDL-self # These use the same format as "Replacements" above [SelfLicenseReplacement] LookFor={{PD-self([^\}]*)}} ReplaceWith={{PD-user|%%OriginalUploader%%|en}} [SelfLicenseReplacement] LookFor={{GFDL-self([^\}]*)}} ReplaceWith={{GFDL-user|%%OriginalUploader%%|en$1}} [SelfLicenseReplacement] LookFor={{self([^\}]*)}} ReplaceWith={{self$1|author=[[%%InterwikiLinkPrefix%%:%%OriginalUploader%%|]]}} # ... put as many as needed

 Working on kowiki and itwiki. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. (Revised on 20:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC), 21:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC))

Thanks for those. Note that you can only use one entry for each parameter unless specified (you have two Licensing entries in the frwiki file): I might need to add that to the subpage. Don't worry about cleaning it up, though; I'll do it. Thanks, — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 23:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

P.S. You didn't have to welcome my alternate account, Ebe123 on the go!. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 23:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Error: Should

[SelfLicenseReplacement]
LookFor={{Domaine public par auteur([^\}]*)}}
ReplaceWith={{PD-author|%%OriginalUploader%%|en}}

be

[SelfLicenseReplacement]
LookFor={{Domaine public par auteur([^\}]*)}}
ReplaceWith={{PD-author|%%OriginalUploader%%|fr}}

(Change in the end of the third line). There's another one two sets down that also uses en. Is this something that needs fixing? Sven Manguard Wha? 16:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I caught those and fixed them (I hope). If you want to use the fr.wikipedia local wiki data file, please download the fixed version from http://atlight.github.com/ftcg/fr.wikipedia.wiki. Thanks for letting me know, though. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:06, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Twinkle commit access

Just wondering if I could have commit access to Twinkle. I know a bit of JavaScript (I've written a few scripts), but nothing major like Twinkle. If approved, I plan to make mostly minor fixes and bug-fixes. (My user name is mc10.) Thanks. —mc10 (t/c) 05:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

I don't own the repository: AzaToth does, so you'll have to ask him. He's rarely active on enwiki these days, and I haven't heard from him on IRC for a while, so your best bet for contacting him would probably be by e-mail or a github message.

It would certainly be good to have you on board, to act on things at WT:TW. I try my best to stay on top of it, but it can be difficult. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:09, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

You've essentially become the project lead. If it's possible to share repository ownership, you should ask AzaToth to share it with you. If he's becoming inactive, it's best for someone who is still active to secure top level access before he goes totally dark. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

AFAICS there is no way of sharing repository ownership on github. If AzaToth ever goes away altogether, I would probably fork the repository (so I have ownership of a copy) and then use my fork as the central repo. But AzaToth does usually come back, so I don't expect to need to do that. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

In fact, he just returned today to sync the gadget (finally!). So he's clearly around. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm not here, it's only the ghost of years past :) (Have had alot IRL to take care of, job etc...) _→AzaToth 20:28, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Magic spell

You proposed Wikipedia:Magic spell to deal with "unpatrollable" pages for deletion as redundant. But as far as I can see, the bug still exists. Please explain to me how to remove the patrolled tag from User talk:RHaworth/patrl tst (new pages listing) without using my trick. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

The issue is supposed to be fixed; perhaps consider reopening bug 30368 and linking to this instance. Obviously, consensus is to keep the page, and I'm not at all against this consensus. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, This, that and the other. You have new messages at Jasper Deng's talk page.
Message added 01:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Let's discuss it at User talk:Jasper Deng/IPv6 instead. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, This, that and the other. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Twinkle.
Message added 18:35, 23 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 18:35, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

File:5000×5000 noise.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:5000×5000 noise.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  :Jay8g ^{Hi!- I am... -What I do...} _{WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM} 14:25, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, This, that and the other. You have new messages at User talk:This, that and the other/Archive 2/For_the_Common_Good.
Message added 22:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3 sections waiting. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 22:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:Category:Cleanup tagged articles without a reason field

Re:Category:Cleanup tagged articles without a reason field

It may be a good idea to link "script-assisted edit" phrase to User:This, that and the other/cleanupCleanup.js (Category:Cleanup tagged articles without a reason field is with more than 25k articles) Bulwersator (talk) 08:31, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Good idea; Y done. You may have to clear your browser cache to see the changes.

I'm glad you like the script. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:41, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Bulwersator (talk) 13:31, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

And {{cleanup}} tag without a reason may link to Category:Cleanup tagged articles without a reason field Bulwersator (talk) 14:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

I am using the script variable wgCategories, which should avoid such problems. — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

I'd like to see the edit summary changed to "Added reason code to cleanup tag (script assisted edit)". With appropriate changes to the script of course. Rich Farmbrough, 18:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC).

I wondered how long it would take before someone asked me that... — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:42, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Current Year listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Current Year. Since you had some involvement with the Current Year redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 01:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

New messages

Hello. You have a new message at User talk:CMBJ's talk page.

FtCG

About my request, it should be done ASAP. For tomorrow. ~~Ebe123~~ → report 15:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC)