Thuiop

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Thuiop! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Writing an article
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Help pages
• The Teahouse (newcomer help)
• Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 21:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello, I'm Alalch E.. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Virgo interferometer in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Your edit summary was Splitting the "Improving the sensitivity" section among the others, but you removed 1kb of prose. From the diff it is apparent that you made various changes that are not reflected in the summary. You are free to remake your change in incremental steps using appropriate edit summaries for each step. Thank you —Alalch E. 22:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Alalch E., the section has been partly redundant for a while now, as well as overly complicated for some parts, which is why I did remove some text in the process, although the substance does not change a lot ; it would have been a bit weird to do it in separate steps, as addressing the content of this section is a single unit of work. Nevertheless, I agree that the edit summary was lacking, so I will remake the edits with more details on what was done. Thuiop (talk) 07:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Thuiop. Thank you for your work on Ground-based interferometric gravitational-wave search. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

@SunDawn: Thanks a lot for the review ! Wish you the best. Thuiop (talk) 18:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Please see...

My bold edits and explanations, here and here, regarding work reverted by a microbiologist. If you see value in what was offered in the first link, I leave it to you to contact the reverting editor. We'll put no further effort into the article, if the reversion fully persists. (Nor will we and others be able to use the article, for the reasons explained in the second link.) Cheers. 98.193.42.97 (talk) 16:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the ping. I'll take a look later in the evening. Thuiop (talk) 19:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)