Welcome!

edit

Hello, Disabilityrightsoregon, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Disability Rights Oregon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Disability Rights Oregon

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Disability Rights Oregon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022

edit
 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website - I have blocked this account. Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a change of username of your current account here. The new username must represent only yourself as an individual and comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization, person or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest. You may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Should be all set. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 14:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Undisclosed paid editing

edit
 

Hello Tinap-dro. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Disability Rights Oregon, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tinap-dro. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tinap-dro|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Drm310,
Yes, I am a part of the organization that I am writing about. I am formally disclosing here that I am. (paid disclosure moved to userpage by Drm310)
Thank you. Tinap-dro (talk) 19:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. One small point, this is your user talk page. I have moved your disclosure to your user page (User:Tinap-dro), which is the proper location. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Your draft article Draft:Disability Rights Oregon still exists, although its content was removed by another user. You are free to start over, but please keep these things in mind:
  • Wikipedia articles are paraphrased summaries of previously published material about a topic, taken from reliable sources that are unaffiliated with the subject.
  • Primary sources affiliated with the subject should be used sparingly to verify only basic facts and figures. They cannot establish a subject as notable; sufficiently significant coverage in third-party sources is required.
  • Wikipedia articles are meant to be plainly factual and written from a neutral point of view. This is particularly important for someone such as yourself with an inherent conflict of interest. Any language that is considered promotional or overly praiseworthy will not be accepted.
  • Article content is owned by no one. The article subject has no right of ownership or control over its contents, and they cannot insist that it remains at a version they prefer. Anyone editing in good faith (which we assume unless proven otherwise) may edit an article at any time, and an article's content can change over time, perhaps substantially. Content disputes should be discussed calmly and rationally on the article's talk page, using a process of discussion and compromise to arrive at consensus. If that fails to resolve the disagreement, further dispute resolution measures are available.
--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Drm310, I am an employee of Disability Rights Oregon, not a paid promoter. Does that distinction change my ability to draft and submit a page on Disability Rights Oregon? Tinap-dro (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Tinap-dro: You do not have to be paid specifically to write on Wikipedia; being an employee of the organization is enough for the paid editing policy to apply. However, since you have disclosed this information and therefore complied with the policy, there is no technical restriction on your ability to create and submit content. So, you are free to try again, keeping in mind that the content you submit is still subject to the core content policies I previously described. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Tinap-dro! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disability Rights Oregon (July 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disability Rights Oregon (July 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 03:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'm afraid that this may be a case of "no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability". If your organization hasn't received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, then it won't be notable enough for inclusion. Sorry. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:22, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Disability Rights Oregon

edit

  Hello, Tinap-dro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Disability Rights Oregon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply