Tomaras12345
Hello, Tomaras12345, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 13:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- thank you :) I saw that someone removed some good content on the Punjab page when I was scrolling through and thought I'd made an account to bring them back and put them to a better stabdard Tomaras12345 (talk) 14:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Tomaras12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, I think there may have been a misunderstanding. I added back the removed content because it contained lots of good info that I had read previosuly and so because of the reasons listed to remove it I aimed to change that to keep the content. I am not the same user as the one that was previously removed. Also Ive only edited in Punjab, and the Vardhana dynasty so im not sure how that means I have been copying another user.
Decline reason:
Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 20:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Tomaras12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It doesnt let me reply to the previous unblock thread and couldnt find anything to help me reply so made a new one. Why does this ban, which I disagree with and am not involved with the other acount and would like this to be reviewed as the evidence is weak, mean that my content is now removed (in the 'Punjab' and 'Pushyabhuti dynasty' pages). I provided all sources, pages, quotes etc. My edits do not fall under the category of disruptive editing or vandalism as it doesn not disrupt progress the towards developing the article. e.g. In 'Punjab' I added stronger sources/removed weaker ones, added quotes, page numbers and made certain texts in a more formal tone. And in the Pushyabhuti page I added a geography section with all strong sources, page numbers, quotes etc which you can see in all the pages edit logs. Please may the content removal be reverted..
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 19:53, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.