Trngo
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
edit
|
June 2021
editWelcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Kate Winslet. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Elizium23 (talk) 16:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kate Winslet, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Elizium23 (talk) 20:35, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- I detailed the film critics and journalists mentioned in the cited links.
- Please explain why the added edits do not address the maintenance template. Trngo (talk) 20:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Trngo, like who? What are their names? Who do they write for? Do you have reliable secondary sources that aggregate these views and confirm that these are widespread opinions? Elizium23 (talk) 20:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Please look at the links that are provided as part of the citations. They are provided as primary sources. Trngo (talk) 20:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- No. Summarize the reliable secondary sources in the article so that the readers may know what they say. Never demand the readers go looking into the sources for facts that should be plain in the article. Elizium23 (talk) 20:47, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Can you provide an example of reliable secondary source from a Wikipedia entry that confirms that something is a widespread opinion?
- No. Summarize the reliable secondary sources in the article so that the readers may know what they say. Never demand the readers go looking into the sources for facts that should be plain in the article. Elizium23 (talk) 20:47, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Please look at the links that are provided as part of the citations. They are provided as primary sources. Trngo (talk) 20:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Trngo, like who? What are their names? Who do they write for? Do you have reliable secondary sources that aggregate these views and confirm that these are widespread opinions? Elizium23 (talk) 20:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. Trngo (talk) 20:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- France, R. T. (2007-07-11). The Gospel of Matthew. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8028-2501-8. from the Gospel of Matthew. Elizium23 (talk) 20:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. Trngo (talk) 20:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Point taken.
- But why are Wikipedia articles on Nicole Kidman and Cate Blanchett allowed to have similar attributions?
- Shouldn't Wikipedia editorial standards be consistent across the board? Trngo (talk) 21:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Please see WP:OTHERCONTENT. Elizium23 (talk) 21:03, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Shouldn't Wikipedia editorial standards be consistent across the board? Trngo (talk) 21:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Again on Kate Winslet, note that the article is in British English. Your edit was fine, but before assuming an article is written in American English, please check the tags! MapReader (talk) 07:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 14
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halsey. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)