User talk:Trtaha

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thiab Taha (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HurricaneZeta were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

• meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
• or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
  

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All the sources here are primary, for example one is directly from the Fulbright website and another is directly from the site of the award he won. We would like to see more secondary and reliable sources which are independent of the subject - for example, news sources covering his research or win of the award. Based on the article's content, the topic is likely notable (qualifies for an article) per the relevant notability guideline - it's just some of the issues with the sourcing. Additionally, make sure that the draft is entirely neutral, that all parts are sourced (the personal life and education section aren't, as well as some sentences), and that the bare references are fixed (see Help:Referencing for beginners - adding extra information using a template to the citations helps prevent link rot).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thiab Taha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Z E T A^C 00:42, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Trtaha! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Z E T AC 00:42, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thiab Taha (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ktkvtsh were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thiab Taha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:09, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Dear Dr. Ktkvtsh,

Thank you very much for your review. I have used ChatGPT, but mainly to help me with the references. I revised the application without using it. I had an issue with the references and I hope that this time they are acceptable. Please let me know if you have any comments.

Best regards,

Thiab Taha Trtaha (talk) 21:37, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Noted. I've gone ahead and fixed your sources using a Wikipedia tool. Also, there is a built in citation creator in Wikipedia that you can just paste the link to your source and it will create the citation for you. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:43, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Dear Dr. Ktkvtsh,

I do value your hep with the references and your prompt respnse. I hope that I have addressed your recommendaion regarding the references in the new Draft's edit. Please let me know if anything else I need to address.

Best regards,

Thiab Taha Trtaha (talk) 17:35, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Trtaha, if you'd like to resubmit the draft for review, you are more than welcome to. Another user will take a look at it. Best, Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Dear Dr. Ktkvtsh,

I resubmitted the draft for review.

Thanks again for your guidance and help.

Regards,

Thiab Taha Trtaha (talk) 22:27, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thiab Taha (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nighfidelity was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thiab Taha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nighfidelity (talk) 15:32, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Thiab Taha

Hello, Trtaha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thiab Taha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 1 August 2026 (UTC)