Marylyn Fox
Born (1995-04-14) April 14, 1995 (age 29)
OccupationWikipedia editor

Marylyn Fox is a Wikipedia editor and Social Media Specialist.

About me

edit

Hi!

My name is Marylyn. I'm a sport and food addict. And I am so in love with Corgi. Welcome to my page. I am here to create really awesome articles, add useful edits and improve Wikipedia day by day.

February 2019

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page InsideView has been reverted.
Your edit here to InsideView was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/insideview) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

March 2019

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.--VVikingTalkEdits 13:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

wp:User talk pages are not to be used for advertising purposes. Nor are they for article information, they are used to communicate with a specific editor. Please do not re-add this company information to your talk page. You can see the your first article link above for information on how to create the article you are trying to create. By continually creating the article on the company you seem to be using your talk page to WP:SPAM.--VVikingTalkEdits 13:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Trymemore! You created a thread called Review my first created business page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply


edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Uber article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Yamla (talk) 14:58, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

This also applies to your edit to PayPal, where you also copied and pasted content from another source. --Yamla (talk) 15:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Uggh, and Germany. Please go back through all of your contributions and remove any copyright violations you have committed. This is serious, you are placing the entire project in jeopardy with these violations. --Yamla (talk) 15:05, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
As you have refused to do this and as it's hard to find any of your contributions that don't blatantly violate copyright, I have blocked you indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 13:30, 27 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dear Yamla, I understand what you mean, unfortunately, I saw all your messages today. I'm a new user and was not informed before about copywriting policy. I realize that it was my fault, but I'm ready to correct and to edit concerning to the Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The problem is copyright not copywriting, which are two different things. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

May 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Yamla. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Prime Minister of India, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 15:00, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dear Yamla, the source was CNN which is a reliable one for Wikipedia related to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#CNN, please take this into consideration. This list is a guide for me, if it's not correct please inform me about that. I'm waiting for your response. Best regards, Marylyn.

  • Yamla, unfortunately, I cannot write to your talk page. I realize that some edits were incorrect, but I'm ready to not repeat it again. For me is very important my daily contribution to Wikipedia, thus I provide necessary information to the audience, and you know that this takes a lot of time. I need only a chance, if it will repeat again, I'm ready to delete my account, but I sincerely want to make a positive impact for the world. Yesterday, I submitted an unblock request, and do not have any response. Please, say me how can I get my account unblocked or correct this? I will de everything what is needed
    I responded to your UTRS unblock request by email yesterday, so you should have received that. My response said "As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. You can follow these instructions. You were blocked for copyright violations, so please be sure to address that in your unblock request."

    So what you need to do is make an unblock request here on this page, by following the instructions in the block message below. That unblock request will need to convince a reviewing admin that you fully understand the reasons for your block and that they will not be repeated. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Trymemore (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #25379 was submitted on May 28, 2019 09:10:41. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 09:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply