User talk:Tttg2

January 2026

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Happy Together (song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Online forum posts are generally not reliable. Binksternet (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Wixsite fails WP:USERG, as does goodreads.com, which is further described at WP:GOODREADS. Binksternet (talk) 23:13, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fram (talk) 10:06, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 1975 Australian constitutional crisis. - Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 02:19, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of people with bipolar disorder

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of people with bipolar disorder, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:05, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Amor Group

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Amor Group, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:33, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Erika (song)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Erika (song), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:43, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Erica Krogseter moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Erica Krogseter. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs sources to verify this plant's existence (see article talk page). I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:21, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Erica Krogseter

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Erica Krogseter, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:19, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

AINB notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup/Noticeboard regarding an AI cleanup investigation which may be related to you. It concerns recent additions with information that contradicts the sources used. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:40, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Hello, Tttg2, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Blu sweet roses (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:00, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of You're the One (B.E.R song)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page You're the One (B.E.R song) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a musical recording which did not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:18, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tttg2. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 16:30, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tamsyn Cornwall

The article Tamsyn Cornwall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the requirements of WP:NMUSICIAN / WP:ANYBIO.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Dan arndt (talk) 05:51, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Tamsyn Cornwall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamsyn Cornwall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamsyn Cornwall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:15, 29 March 2026 (UTC)