Tulsipres
Hello, Tulsipres, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 14:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Important info
editCIA, FBI computers used for Wikipedia edits - Reuters - 2007
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia-idUSN1642896020070816
I suggest adding the following to the page:
In September 2021, it was revealed that the Central Intellegence Agency (CIA) discussed assassinating Julian Assange. Donald Trump CIA director Mike Pompeo had requested ‘options’ for killing Assange.[1]
Voting graph on main CIA page? USA and CIA involvement in election interference attempts to overthrow governments ad foreign wars master list
editI propose a foreign war, CIA involvement, US attempts to overthrow, and voting graph, it would probably be several pages long. Has this been done yet? United States foreign electoral intervention expanding on Foreign electoral intervention
1. Voting - 81 countries
The U.S. has intervened in the most elections between 1946 to 2000: 81 elections in total, followed by the Soviet Union/Russia with 36 examples of interference.
The U.S. is the biggest election meddler of them all, new book claims. Kim Hjelmgaard USA TODAY
The United States has messed with more than twice as many elections as Russia/Soviet Union, according to "Meddling in the Ballot Box: The Causes and Effects of Partisan Electoral Interventions," out September 7 2020. Dov H. Levin, a political scientist at the University of Hong Kong first in-depth analysis of electoral interventions "from the dawn of the modern era to the 2016 Russian intervention in the U.S. election."
ISBN: 978-0-19751-989-9 review
Russia 1996
2. Government overthrown
Overthrowing other people’s governments: The Master List By William Blum
https://williamblum.org/essays/read/overthrowing-other-peoples-governments-the-master-list (to Ukraine 2014)
The CIA has Blum's book on their webpage.
3. Wars with the USA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States
I am trying to find master list...
- https://archive.org/details/TimeUSMeddlingOnRussia/page/n1/mode/2up Here is Time Magazine. A drunk Yeltsin would go on campaign rallies and say his pockets were flush with cash.
- https://www.google.com/search?q=pockets+yeltsin+money+1996+election&oq=pockets+yeltsin+money+1996+election&aqs=chrome..69i57j33i160.15194j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
- YELTSIN PAYING TOP RUBLE FOR POSITIVE NEWS COVERAGE https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1996/06/30/yeltsin-paying-top-ruble-for-positive-news-coverage/fdc11c69-66ba-4385-98a6-77493ad8c211
- Boris Yeltsin's presidential campaign and its financial backers are spending large sums of cash -- hundreds of thousands of dollars by some estimates -- to bribe and influence Russian journalists and drive home an anti-Communist message, according to a variety of sources ...
2. Government overthrown
Overthrowing other people’s governments: The Master List By William Blum
https://williamblum.org/essays/read/overthrowing-other-peoples-governments-the-master-list (to Ukraine 2014)
The CIA has Blum's book on their webpage.
3. Wars with the USA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States
I am trying to find master list...
United States foreign electoral intervention moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, United States foreign electoral intervention, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced content to articles
editHello. Please do not add unsourced or factually erroneous content to articles, as you did here at Foreign electoral intervention. In that edit, you cited Levin 2016 for an assertion that the U.S. was responsible for foreign electoral intervention "up to and including the 2014 Ukrainian coup d'etat."
However, Levin's database covers the years 1946 to 2000; it does not extend to 2014. While events outside those years are mentioned in Levin's paper, the only discussion of Ukraine is as follows: "Shulman and Bloom (2012, 460–64) conducted a conventional public opinion survey on domestic reactions to electoral interventions in the Ukraine fourteen months after the 2004 presidential election in which such an intervention occurred. ... If Russia was indeed behind the (still disputed) case of the attempted poisoning of Viktor Yushchenko in 2004, the main Ukrainian opposition candidate, that is one recent example, albeit somewhat extreme and unusual, of the use of such an electoral intervention method."
Levin 2016 does not appear to reference the 2014 events at all, let alone label them as a U.S.-backed coup; meanwhile, our article on the topic is named Revolution of Dignity, because the phrase "2014 Ukrainian coup d'etat"
is almost exclusively found in Russian propaganda sources. Repeatedly adding inaccurate material that fails verification is considered misconduct and can lead to sanctions on Wikipedia, so please do not do it again. Additionally, please do not falsely mark such edits as "minor," as you did in this example. Regards,TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 13:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)