Twiter is the best
--Twiter is the best (talk) (talk) 07:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Lakshya (talk)Twiter is the best (talk) (talk) 07:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)-- I'm new at Wikipedia so please everybody please post this like autoconfirm etc.
Names of people who helped me |
---|
Lectonar (talk) |
Topher385 (talk) |
Vincent Liu (something to say?) |
January (talk)
|
Stefan2 (talk) |
Magog the Ogre (talk) |
Graham87 |
Fut.Perf. ☼ |
These name will increase when more people will help me I will wait for feedback Thank you twiter is the best (talk). If you want to follow me at Facebook go to Lakshya Kumar my photo is a flower made by tongue.
See Help:Table.
Lectonar (talk) 13:22, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! If you want to upload an image, you can submit a request here. If you have any other questions, feel free to stop by the Teahouse or the help desk. You might also want to browse through the help pages.
Topher385 (talk) 14:26, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- And see WP:Upload. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
To upload photos, visit Wikipedia:Upload. For other help editing, please try Help desk and the help pages. Hope you have a great time here!
Vincent Liu (something to say?) 09:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Flower of Hydrangeas.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Flower of Hydrangeas.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Flower of zoomed chrysanthemum.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Flower of zoomed chrysanthemum.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Flower of tulips.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Flower of tulips.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 14:54, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Desert of Gobi.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Desert of Gobi.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
You are autoconfirmed when your account is 4 days old and have made 10 edits.
Vincent Liu (something to say?) 02:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Under water jelifish.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Under water jelifish.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:12, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyright problems with File:Light house in USA beach.jpg
editHello. Concerning your contribution, File:Light house in USA beach.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Light house in USA beach.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Light house in USA beach.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Light house in USA beach.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Light house in USA beach.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Light house in USA beach.jpg.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk•edits) 21:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyright problems with File:Koala in Mauritius.jpg
editHello. Concerning your contribution, File:Koala in Mauritius.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Koala in Mauritius.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Koala in Mauritius.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Koala in Mauritius.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Koala in Mauritius.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Koala in Mauritius.jpg.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk•edits) 21:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyright problems with File:Penguins of Antartica.jpg
editHello. Concerning your contribution, File:Penguins of Antartica.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Penguins of Antartica.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Penguins of Antartica.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Penguins of Antartica.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Penguins of Antartica.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Penguins of Antartica.jpg.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk•edits) 21:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Regarding your userpage
editWhat's wrong about being a kid? People of all ages can edit Wikipedia! (guess my age)--Vincent Liu (something to say?) 10:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I'm a kid of ten years and editing wikipedia
- Username: Twiter is the best
- User ID: 17267148
- Member of groups: Autoconfirmed users, Users
- Number of edits: 101 Past (gaining more edits)
- Registration time: 18:09, 3 August 2012
- Global account status: All in order!
- Your account is active on 5 project sites.
(Manage your global account | View global user info)
That's great! We always need one more contributor. And I'll add that the Talkback template is supposed to be on my talk page, not yours. --Vincent Liu (something to say?) 11:04, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
And also which language do you know? --Twiter is the best (talk) 11:28, 15 August 2012 (UTC)LakshyaTwiter is the best (talk) 11:28, 15 August 2012 (UTC)--
You should find everything on my user page. If you have any questions about me, or about editing Wikipedia in general, feel free to leave me a message. --Vincent Liu (something to say?) 12:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Hippopotamus by LAKSHYA.jpg
editThank you for uploading File:Hippopotamus by LAKSHYA.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:58, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I've undone your edit to List of French people because that's not how Template:See also works at all. Please use the preview button before saving your edits. Graham87 14:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- No worries. Graham87 12:32, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Blocked
editI've blocked you, again (after your previous blocks as Lakshya (razor) (talk · contribs) and Mannat (Mannot) (talk · contribs)). You evidently do not understand what it means to contribute to an encyclopedia. I'm sorry I have to say this, but you really seem to be too young to contribute here. Please do not continue to create new accounts; you will only cause people more work and yourself more frustration, and any such accounts will be blocked again. Wait a few years until you're a bit older and understand better what it means to write for a project like this. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:30, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Re:Blocked
editI think you've done it wrong, it's not in my block log. WilyD 13:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)