User talk:Tzoller
Add topicManaging a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, Tzoller. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Zango (company), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. We ask that you:
- Avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors
- Disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI)
- Propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions
- Avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming)
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation for any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
See the FAQ for article subjects for more information.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Hey - I looked at your contribution history and I think it's really worth you looking through Wikipedia's policies on Conflict of Interest... Joe (talk) 10:30, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you Joe Tzoller (talk) 21:20, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
July 2026
[edit] Hello, I'm Zippybonzo, and welcome to Wikipedia. I appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (they/them) 20:59, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- I would actually welcome an example as I took great care to cite reliable sources. Peer reviewed journals usually are reliable sources, are they? Tzoller (talk) 21:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Fence127 (talk) 15:36, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Draft:BTCrack
[edit]
Draft:BTCrack, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:BTCrack and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:BTCrack during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fence127 (talk) 15:41, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- This article entry has been entered exactly as required with a COI tag associated to it, on that ground I oppose deletion.
- I also oppose deletion of this tool as it is cited and referenced in peer reviewed journals, published in IEEE and others. There is no basis of deletion that I find justified. So far no one has engaged me on the steps as I suggested in this page. Tzoller (talk) 15:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- We will need other opinions on the subject too. Also, please discuss this at WP:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:BTCrack. Fence127 (talk) 16:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
On behalf of User:Joereddington
[edit]I'm sending this message on behalf of User:Joereddington:
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Fence127 (talk) 15:49, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you, I noticed evidently as I, as documented on that very page, took position and am awaiting a reply. Tzoller (talk) 16:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: BTCrack (August 6)
[edit]
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:BTCrack to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
 |
Hello, Tzoller!
Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help?
|