User talk:Fence127

Welcome!

Hello, Fence127, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! GiantSnowman 19:29, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Getting started

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

Finding your way around

• Table of contents
• Directories and indexes
• Department directory

Editing articles

• How to develop an article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help

• Frequently asked questions
• Cheatsheet
• Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
• The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
• Help pages
• Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

• Community Portal
• Join a WikiProject
• Follow Wikipedia etiquette
• Practice civility
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

GiantSnowman 19:29, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mokhtar Abdelatif Stadium (July 15)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Lynch44, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Mokhtar Abdelatif Stadium to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Lynch44 18:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Fence127! Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help? For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know. To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk. For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! Lynch44 18:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Fence127! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Requests for renaming (moving) articles, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mokhtar Abdelatif Stadium (July 19)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Bkissin, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Mokhtar Abdelatif Stadium to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Bkissin (talk) 02:18, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Stop

Please stop playing with the warning templates, as you did here for example. Doing so is seen as disruptive. If you would like to test user warnings then please do so here. Thanks. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 09:11, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Sorry. I won't do that again. Fence127 (talk) 16:25, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

This was totally inappropriate and I have reverted it. Don't do that again. • a frantic turtle 🐢 solidarity 16:33, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Fence127! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Possible bug?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Mercedes-Benz Conecto moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mercedes-Benz Conecto. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and two sentences stub article sourced only to the manufacturer's own website. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Lone Wolf ^howl 20:00, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Someone moves it to draft space and then hours later you move it back into article space without addressing any of the issues or going through the draft process to get it reviewed. Before commenting on other people's behaviour in WP:ANI you really need to get your own house in order. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:48, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

I added a lot of info to it. Plus, it said you could move the page back. Fence127 (talk) 10:30, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

You are doing the very thing that you are commenting about in ANI. Don't just arbitrarily move a draft to main space, use the AfC review process. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Mercedes-Benz Conecto (mid-floor version) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mercedes-Benz Conecto (mid-floor version). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and This was moved to draft space by another editor and you moved it back when it clearly is not ready. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:47, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mercedes-Benz Conecto (mid-floor version) (August 2)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Three of the four citations are to MB's own website. No subject can establish its own notability per WP:GNG.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Mercedes-Benz Conecto (mid-floor version) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:38, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Fence127,

One sign that someone is a new editor is that they keep moving pages around, to different titles, from one namespace to another, it looks like they have no idea what they are doing because they seem to think their editing has no consequences. But it does. If you don't have page mover rights, which you don't, every page move leaves a redirect page that someone else has to clean up. So moving around pages, randomly, 10 or 20 times for absolutely no good reason, is creating work for others.

You should think about an article move carefully. Be sure you have the page title correct, no typos, that it is in the correct namespace. If an article needs to be moved, it should only be moved once. Wikipedia is generally forgiving of new editors as they learn the rules here but after a few weeks, after a newbie editor has received warnings, if they keep treating Wikipedia like a playground instead of like an encyclopedia, they have their editing privileges restricted and, if the disruption continues after that period, they are blocked. Good luck with your articles and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:07, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

While I'm here, another sign of a newbie editor like yourself is that you post warning templates to editors who've been working on this project for 5, 10, 15 years when you have only been a registered editor for three weeks. All this does is annoy experienced editors who are people who could help you learn the rules here while you scold them for making mistakes that they didn't do. A unwritten rule is don't post warning templates to editors who have much, much more editing experience than you have. There are plenty of scripts here that will post on an editor's User page how long they have been editing and what user rights they have been granted. That can be helpful to know. If you have questions, bring them to the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:15, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mercedes-Benz Conecto (mid-floor version) (August 4)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Accesscrawl, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Rather than creating a standalone article, useful content here should be merged into the existing article.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Mercedes-Benz Conecto (mid-floor version) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Accesscrawl (talk) 07:20, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

WP:HERE

Hi. Can I suggest that you focus a bit more on encyclopedia building than weighing-in (often incorrectly and seemingly without even taking 90 seconds to think about it) on topics and administration activities with which you seem to have limited understanding/experience? Multiple experienced editors and administrators (including @Liz, @10mmsocket, @A Frantic Turtle, @Star Mississippi and others) have suggested that you consider focusing on building-up experience and actually constructively contributing to project content before taking it upon yourself to "police" the actions of others (especially when ill-considered and inaccurate). Please consider heeding the well-meaning advice of others - as your interjections into random non-article spaces is starting to reach the levels of disruption/noise discussed in WP:IDHT. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 11:53, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Pay attention to those wise words as you are a gnat's whisker away from a block (or you would be if I was an admin). 10mmsocket (talk) 12:20, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

I will. Fence127 (talk) 14:14, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

You clearly aren't paying attention are you? Removing maintenance tags from articles with no explanation. Collapsing tiny tables. What's that all about and how it is improving articles? 10mmsocket (talk) 08:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

It's because there were enough citations now and the expanded table may cause margin problems on mobile. (especially when using tablet.) Fence127 (talk) 10:18, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

You didn’t explain any of that in your edit summary 10mmsocket (talk) 13:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I was in a rush because I needed to do something in real life. Fence127 (talk) 14:00, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Minor question about minor edit

At here I was under the impression that ”a... laying of wreaths” was still grammatically correct and readable so I just wanted to know why drop the “of”. In any case it’s a single word so not a big deal by any means. ~2026-42981-01 (talk) 08:01, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

The 'of' is not necessary, but both make sense. Fence127 (talk) 09:06, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

It is used in dozens of articles so is appropriate. Why change something that is fine? 10mmsocket (talk) 09:11, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week because your recent edits appear to be disruptive. Please note that this is not necessarily an assessment of faith or character, and we welcome good faith edits that are also constructive and in line with our policies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Star Mississippi 03:34, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

@Fence127 enough is enough. You show absolutely no interest in listening to any feedback and have moved to disrupting articles as well. Please stop the behavior entirely when the block ends or it will be extended Star Mississippi 03:35, 10 August 2026 (UTC)