User talk:U2123306

August 2026

Hello, I'm Royz-vi Tsibele. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Awooga have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please do not change a redirect's destination without consensus. Mit khavershaft, Royz-vi Tsibele🧅 00:36, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Awooga. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Awooga was changed by U2123306 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906062 on 2026-08-01T00:51:13+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:51, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Awooga, you may be blocked from editing. Mit khavershaft, Royz-vi Tsibele🧅 03:23, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Please explain why the change is "vandalism". "Awooga" is often associated with the wolf whistle in old cartoons. U2123306 (talk) 09:18, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

The redirect as it currently stands goes to Vehicle horn#Klaxon. Your change of this redirect, without citation nor consensus, appear to constitute vandalism as they can be disruptive to other articles that link to the redirect. If you truly believe that the redirect's destination should be changed, consider making a post on its talk page. Mit khavershaft, Royz-vi Tsibele🧅 13:07, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Dafootballguy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Awooga, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dafootballguy Want to talk? In solidarity 22:53, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Awooga. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dafootballguy Want to talk? In solidarity 22:55, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

@U2123306 saying that a target should be changed on a talk page against consensus isn't a reason to change the link. Dafootballguy Want to talk? In solidarity 22:57, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

You appear to be engaged in an edit war. An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly revert each other's changes. Please do not revert or undo the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, use the talk page to discuss how the page can represent consensus among the editors involved. Here is some advice on how to do this. If discussions get stuck, you can request a third opinion, ask for help at a relevant noticeboard, or seek dispute resolution.

Edit warring can result in being blocked from editing, especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts within 24 hours on one page. Undoing any other editor's work, in whole or in part, involving the same or different material, is a revert. You can still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not violate the three-revert rule should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dafootballguy Want to talk? In solidarity 23:00, 16 August 2026 (UTC)