User talk:Uhlan/Archive 2
Dornier Rs.III
editWelcome to the Aircraft Project! Sorry for hi-jacking your article, but I had one already mostly written and there was a re-direct already, which needed replacing with an article, I hope you approve of the result. Elemnts of your article were incorporated in the final article. On another note you might be interested in resources which can make life easier for writing aviation articles. Have look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation, Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft, Wikipedia:New articles (Aircraft). and you might want to use List of Aircraft and/or Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Missing articles as a guide to which aircraft need articles. Templates are useful, particularly for assessment tasks , infoboxes and specifications see:Template:WPAVIATION creator. Good luck with the writing.Petebutt (talk) 13:09, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for repeating myself, I hadn't noticed that you had archived the previous entriesPetebutt (talk) 13:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oh thays O.K! I don't mind if the article is redirected, I just like writing them. Uhlan (talk) 07:28, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Please Stop
editCan you please stop adding categories to aircraft articles , most of them are "parent categories" that dont really belong on the articles you have edited, thanks MilborneOne (talk) 19:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Like what? Uhlan (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- All the ones you have added today like Aircraft, Category:Soviet aircraft 1930–1939 and similar. The aircraft are in a tree of categories and you are placing higher level categories where we dont normally use them. Have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Categories and if you have any questions then please ask at the Aircraft project, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 19:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- O.K no worrys! Uhlan (talk) 20:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- I suspect you should not be adding Category:Military history to article either for the same sort of reasons. Perhaps you should consider going back through your edits and removing them. MilborneOne (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- I think thats all of them done. If there is any more need removing let me know. Cheers. Uhlan (talk) 03:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- I suspect you should not be adding Category:Military history to article either for the same sort of reasons. Perhaps you should consider going back through your edits and removing them. MilborneOne (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- O.K no worrys! Uhlan (talk) 20:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- All the ones you have added today like Aircraft, Category:Soviet aircraft 1930–1939 and similar. The aircraft are in a tree of categories and you are placing higher level categories where we dont normally use them. Have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Categories and if you have any questions then please ask at the Aircraft project, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 19:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Don't like tb? OK
editReplied to what you said. I'm not bothered either way (I just wasn't too keen on the prod). Do you think you could get some project or another to look at it? Otherwise close. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 12:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- I'll notify the Australian; British Empire; (although this wikiproject is very inactive) and Tasmanian Wikiprojects to get a second opinion. Uhlan (talk) 21:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Northern theater of the American Revolutionary War after Saratoga
editI removed it on this (and other articles) because the Military history category is meant for "only general articles and sub-categories", not every military history article. Please see the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Category:Military history discussion. Wild Wolf (talk) 14:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- O.K then. Uhlan (talk) 21:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low 
to High 
, while for quality the scale goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC)