Ultimate Tai

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Ultimate Tai, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm ultimate tai

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Ultimate Tai, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 20:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nazism—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 19:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chloe Cerise

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chloe Cerise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 14:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pokémon Master Journeys: The Series. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Someonewhoisusinginternet ^{(talk | contributions)} 01:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pokémon Journeys: The Series. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. M S Hassan (talk | contributions) 18:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello, I'm Rsjaffe. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hashemites, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Swarna Pandey

Hello, Ultimate Tai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Swarna Pandey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Africa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 17:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm FuzzyMagma. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Janjaweed, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Racism in Sudan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, as you did at Janjaweed, you may be blocked from editing. Don’t add fake references that doesn’t support your edit and if you have an ax to grind, this is not the place FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

FortunateSons (talk) 10:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Noting this conversation, which they started after they had already received the above warning. 97.113.14.140 (talk) 13:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Reliable sources

Hi Ultimate Tai, your comment here gives the impression that you are not very familiar with Wikipedia's policies around reliable sources. Sweeping claims about "the Palestinians", broad accusations of "everyone" or indiscriminate praise for "Iran and Hezbollah and the Arab state media(s)" are not very useful here. You may want to take them to political discussion forums elsewhere on the internet instead (cf. WP:TALK#USE, in particular the "Stay on topic" part). If, however, you have information about the reliability of a particular source (e.g. newspaper, TV station, website) for use in such Wikipedia articles, that might be more relevant. See e.g. WP:RSP and WP:RSN on how Wikipedians conduct such evaluations.

In any case, we now know that in this particular case, the statements you had reported from various governments and media (the Islamic Republic and Hezbollah prove he's alive [...] even the Arab governments and Qatar's Al Jazeera say this is Israeli intimidation.... they're saying it in Arabic.....he isn't dead) were plainly false. This might be useful for you to keep in mind in similar discussions in the future. Regards, HaeB (talk) 12:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I agree with HaeB. Your comments on Talk: Hassan Nasrallah were unproductive, divisive, and in the end, completely false. Be much more careful in the future, and familiarize yourself with WP:NOTAFORUM. Cullen328 (talk) 18:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)