Umanghavelia

Welcome!

Hello, Umanghavelia, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! S Philbrick(Talk) 15:59, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ediindia.org/Cms.aspx?i=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:59, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Answering about my mistake

Okay I understood what I did wrong! Umanghavelia (talk) 16:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2020

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Diff: [1] This edit is completely absurd, promotional content. How on earth can you objectively quantify that a 20-year-old YouTuber is "India's biggest YouTube content creator"? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

He has the most number of subscribers as a individual in Indian YouTube, that's why I added it, I don't think it is wrong to add this. Umanghavelia (talk) 04:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Aguy777. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ajey Nagar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aguy777 (talk) 04:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

I have now written it again in a different way by mentioning subscribers. Umanghavelia (talk) 04:57, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Source of the news- https://thecourierdaily.com/carryminati-most-subscribered-indian-youtube-channel/20315/ Umanghavelia (talk) 05:08, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello Umanghavelia. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Umanghavelia. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Umanghavelia|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

I am not getting paid for my edits, I am it for my interest on the topic. Umanghavelia (talk) 07:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

After giving the reliable proof links of the content, still the content got removed. If you want I can leave that topic and add content on some other content. Umanghavelia (talk) 07:20, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

I just wanted to improve Indian YouTubers Wikipedia page, to be honest these pages suck if we compare it with western YouTube creators Wikipedia pages. I just added neutral points which were true. For example I added- "He is Currently biggest individual Indian YouTuber on the basis of subscribers." This statement is true. I posted this with a proof link. No other individual YouTube channel in India has more subscribers than him. If you guys want I can avoid editing in that page. Thank you! Umanghavelia (talk) 07:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)