August 2012
editHello, I'm Mbinebri. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mbinebri talk ← 13:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Use common names, not necessarily formal names
editI noticed that you've been changing a lot of links to Gabby Douglas and Aly Raisman to their more formal names, Gabrielle and Alexandra, respectively. Please keep in mind that on Wikipedia, we prefer common names, and based on the Olympics coverage, Gabby and Aly are the names used by most English language media outlets. Also, you've been removing the diacritics from Sandra Izbașa - not sure what that's about. If you have a good reason, please leave a useful WP:ES so other editors can see why you made the changes you made. --Mosmof (talk) 17:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
The article Evgenia Shelgunova has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mbinebri talk ← 02:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Warning
editPlease stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Viktoria Komova, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Wolcott (talk) 19:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Viktoria Komova, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wolcott (talk) 04:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 07:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Yulia Tipaeva for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yulia Tipaeva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yulia Tipaeva until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mbinebri talk ← 20:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2nd Warning
editPlease do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ksenia Afanasyeva, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Wolcott (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Carlotta Ferlito, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Wolcott (talk) 15:45, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry
editYou are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence here (once your block has expired please respond at at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Usarusrou). Thank you. Tonywalton Talk 17:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Blocked
editThis account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Usarusrou. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (talk) 20:36, 22 August 2012 (UTC) |