VIde00

December 2019

Hello, I'm NJA. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Costa Brava have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. N.J.A. | talk 13:49, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Vulture have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 12:04, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Phoenix, Arizona, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Donald Albury 12:50, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Montpellier. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. noq (talk) 16:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Donald Albury 19:57, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

• On 10 January 2019, I blocked your account because I believed that you continued to add unsourced contributions after your block expired. However, I realized that you have not edited at all since your block expired. I apologize for this error; I have unblocked your account. Please be sure to read how to add sources to Wikipedia content to avoid further blocks. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

- Donald Albury 16:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Toulon. You have been blocked twice for this behaviour already. Please stop it or you will be blocked again. noq (talk) 10:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:17, 5 March 2020 (UTC)