Welcome!

Hello, VaDawn! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Jerod Lycett (talk) 17:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

VaDawn, you are invited to the Co-op!

edit
 
Hi there! VaDawn, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Taner Edis

edit

Hi thanks for your edits. There is a prominent skeptic that doesn't have a Wikipedia article his name is Taner Edis, he has written some good books. Perhaps you could look into helping me create an article. If I start it maybe you can help? Thanks. A little angry (talk) 11:15, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Louis Fles

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sharon Begley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Masthead. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

New Scientist Review you may want

edit

Review of Psychology of the Psychic by Peter Evans [1] in the New Scientist. A little angry (talk) 05:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ray Hyman has reviewed the Psychology of the Psychic for The Skeptical Inquirer, Volumes 5-6 (1980), pp. 60-61 but I do not have full access to this. A little angry (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you User:A little angry. I'll look into it. I'm going to add information from the second edition to this article, too, and I think this will definitely help.VaDawn (talk) 17:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Psychology of the Psychic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Marks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Psychic Blues: Confessions of a Conflicted Medium

edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mysterious New Mexico

edit

On 10 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mysterious New Mexico, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in his book Mysterious New Mexico, Ben Radford describes the use of scientific techniques to investigate thirteen cases of purported paranormal phenomena? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mysterious New Mexico. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:56, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, VaDawn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of Paranormality by Richard Wiseman (UK).jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of Paranormality by Richard Wiseman (UK).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, VaDawn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, VaDawn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Sharon Begley

edit

On 24 January 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sharon Begley, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible (talk) 06:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply