User talk:Vanamonde93/Archive 19

Archive 15

←

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

Archive 21

→

Archive 25

2017 America East Men's Soccer Tournament

Hi @Vanamonde93:, I believe the article 2017 America East Men's Soccer Tournament was deleted without there being a proper consensus, if anything, there was a slight consensus favoring the article being kept (I don't think a "rough consensus" is adequate for deletion grounds). I don't want to assume that it was a WP:TRIGGERED or WP:OZD deletion, but based on the arguments supporting a deletion, and the arguments supporting a keep, it feels that the article was deleted more so out of not liking the content or sources, without a thorough examination of the sources provided. If we can reach some level of agreement, or understanding, I will avoid taking the page through a deletion review. Thanks. Quidster4040 (talk) 16:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

No, sorry. I've absolutely no axe to grind here; I don't give two hoots about US college football. The consensus was what it was: there were five keep votes, of which one wished to keep because otherwise the page would be a redlink, one who said they were unsure, and one who said it was because it determined an entrant into the division one championship. As such, these !votes cannot be given much weight, leaving a consensus to delete. There were substantive questions raised about both your sources and the guideline you were quoting, which you had not, in my view, answered well enough. In any case, I'm not interested in re-litigating the AfD here. If you don't like the outcome, you've got to live with it. If you think I read the consensus wrong, you can take it to DRV, by all means. Vanamonde (talk) 17:15, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

This is a pathetic answer, and I will be going through with a nomination, you should feel very sorry. Quidster4040 (talk) 23:30, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

(talk page watcher)This ain't a battleground and how about assuming some good faith?!Winged Blades ^Godric 16:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 18:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Mukul Sinha

Hi there! I did a bit of work on this page a few days ago, cleaning it up a bit, and just returned to do a bit more, but a lot of what I had done has been messed around with by another user (whose work you then partially removed). That users work reintroduced several errors including really bad grammar, peacocky language, various bits of incorrectly cited information ie, claims the subject died of a heart attack when newspaper reports clearly state lung cancer etc etc. I cant revert it without reverting you...I've only been editing a few months, so not sure if its good form to ask to revert you, or wether you can revert yourself or? I was going to try to take it back to this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mukul_Sinha&diff=prev&oldid=812672373 version. Curdle (talk) 09:32, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

@Curdle: Thanks for asking. I've no problem if you revert me in this circumstance, and very few editors will have a problem with you going back to a "last good version", so long as that does not actually involve a revert of the content they added/removed. In this case, I was objecting to the stuff in the "controversy" section, which isn't present in the version you linked, either, so there's no issues. That version, though, could also do with some copy-editing. Vanamonde (talk) 13:10, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Thankyou ! Uhuh it still needs going over some more,(some of the citations arent as good as they could be and a bit stretched, as well as more copy editing) thats why I came back to it- and it took a bit of work to get it to that state, which was why it was a bit scary to see it all gone. Anyways, reverted now, will work on the rest tommorrow as its late here now.Curdle (talk) 14:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vanamonde93. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

An exceptional barnstar for you

	The World Contest Laurels
	Thankyou for the hard work you put into developing the missing article lists for Women in Red World Contest!! You won the Librarian's 1st Prize of $25!-♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

If you would like to donate any of your winnings into the Women in Red Book Fund to raise money to buy books for editors of women topics who need them on demand please add your name and the amount you'd like to donate in the sub section below the prize winners on the main contest page.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Wow, thanks Dr. Blofeld! I confess I did not expect to win that. Vanamonde (talk) 17:26, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

You did put in a decent effort and on multiple lists when few others bothered. When I offer a prize I mean it! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your close of the 2017 America East Men's Soccer Tournament DRV

Thanks for closing this, but could you please re-close it using the correct format template? Instructions are at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Administrator instructions. Thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Hmm..I came here after this series of bold edits.Hope, you won't mind.Regrets!Winged Blades ^Godric 16:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

@RoySmith: Thanks for letting me know. @Winged Blades of Godric: Not at all: thanks for taking care of it. I might be an admin, but every time I need to do something even slightly new syntax-wise, I tend to frack it up the first time. Vanamonde (talk) 16:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

No worries. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

PS, if you're going to be closing DRVs, I suggest you install User:Lifebaka/closedrv.js. That automates most of the tedious formatting. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

@RoySmith: I'm unsure if I'm going to make a habit of it, but the script can't hurt: thanks! Vanamonde (talk) 09:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Minor Readability: Star formation in Perseus through the Spitzer telescope

I had difficulty reading this sentence on top of your wonderful image on your user pageWakelamp (talk) 12:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

@Wakelamp: Hmm, good to know, is this a color issue? Would a lighter blue help? Vanamonde (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

yes where you have used lighter blue it is great. Similarly for the words at the top. I am not colour blind, but blues on blacks cause me a few issues. Thank-you Wakelamp (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

looks great now - hope you family issues go OK Wakelamp (talk) 12:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Canada

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Canada. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Robert Mueller

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert Mueller. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).

Administrator changes

Joe Roe

JzG

Ericorbit • Perceval • Thingg • Tristanb • Violetriga

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

Technical news

• Wikimedians are now invited to vote on the proposals in the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey on Meta Wiki until 10 December 2017. In particular, there is a section of the survey regarding new tools for administrators and for anti-harassment.
• A new function is available to edit filter managers which can be used to store matches from regular expressions.

Arbitration

• Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is open until Sunday 23:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC). There are 12 candidates running for 8 vacant seats.

Miscellaneous

• Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
• The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Please

Please comment on SR Technics. Thank you, --Ванилица (talk) 14:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

@Ванилица: I see that that page has been deleted: but why, in any case, are you contacting me about this? I haven't had anything to do with the page that I can see. Vanamonde (talk) 13:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

You have deleted that page on 27.11.2017. like promotion of SR Technics, but details are not copied from their official site. After adding some references to that page, page had been deleted again, and my User:Ванилица/sandbox too. In Category: Aircraft engineering companies, in which was SR Technics, also there are many diferent companies, and they are doing the same activity.--Ванилица (talk) 18:07, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

You need to carefully read WP:NOTPROMO, WP:RS, and WP:N before trying to create any more pages. Vanamonde (talk) 18:19, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Why are you adding extremist and militant to Bajrang Dal lead introduction

As you can see in my edit I have already pointed out the standard which needs to be followed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gauravsaral (talk • contribs) 17:43, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Essentially because that is the predominant description in reliable sources. Please read WP:NPOV carefully, and discuss any issues you have with the present wording on the talk page of the article. Vanamonde (talk) 17:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Hmm... This user has been already pretty well alerted of the discretionary sanctions and other policies...Any thoughts?Winged Blades ^Godric 18:06, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

If they keep removing content they don't like, they are going to end up with a topic-ban, no doubt; at the moment, though, a little more rope is probably needed. I wish I had the time to try to explain policy to them, but I don't, at the moment. I don't know that it will do any good, but it needs to be tried. Vanamonde (talk) 18:21, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

I think you guys completely missing the point/ trying to miss the point/ pretending to miss the point. The same text with same reasoning is not allowed on Zakir Naik page with reason that "article already has this info so why to add it in the lead". now when I am trying to apply the same logic "article already has this info so why to add it in the lead" then you guys being admins instead of helping me are trying to show that I am in a edit war? Is that the best you guys do seriously ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gauravsaral (talk • contribs) 18:36, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

and this Winged Blades is reverting my changes with complete detail without giving any reason for revert. To be specific the messed up/ made up GDP info about Mughal empire. BTW you guys do understand that writing it on Wikipedia under fake names will not make it real. Right?

And, do you understand that your POV pushing ventures will lead to but an indefinite block?

As to the edit at Mughal empire, the data is about 1700s, not 1500s.So don't put up strawmans.Also, 17th century Mughal empire is approx. equal to entire India and much more.(I did not read the book in much details but will assume that, by India, the author refers to the synonymous Mughal span, for demarcating historical GDPs by current country boundaries would be pretty difficult.And, the source qualifies RS by a mile.Winged Blades ^Godric 18:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Vajrang Dal

I'm on a mobile and accesibilty is limited.But,I believed D4ina removed two sources (Cristophe Jaffrelot and Chetan Bhatt) that marked the organisation as militant and instead added one describing it as paramilitary.Can you double-vet that?Winged Blades ^Godric 19:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC) Winged Blades ^Godric 19:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

You're right, I've reverted the removal. Vanamonde (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Charles, Prince of Wales

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Charles, Prince of Wales. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

OTD caption

Re Haruna, thanks, but it might be good to add , 1915 to the caption. Sca (talk) 16:50, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

@Sca: Good call. Done. Vanamonde (talk) 16:58, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

• Special report: Women in Red World Contest wrap-up

• Blog: Close encounters of the Wikipedia kind

• Featured content: Featured content to finish 2017

• In the media: Stolen seagulls, public domain primates and more

• Arbitration report: Last case of 2017: Mister Wiki editors

• Gallery: Wiki loving

• Interview: Interview with Charlesjsharp, regular contributor of Wikipedia's Featured Pictures

• Recent research: French medical articles have "high rate of veracity"

• Technology report: Your wish lists and more Wikimedia tech

• Traffic report: Notable heroes and bad guys

• Humour: On their way to the WMF Incubator

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States recognition of Jerusalem

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States recognition of Jerusalem. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

	Happy Holidays
	Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 02:07, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks, K.e.coffman. Happy Holidays to you and yours as well. Vanamonde (talk) 04:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Contest Prize

Please email me and state your user name, email address and how much I owe you in your preferred currency.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:01, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Email me your email address so I can send it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: I'm fairly certain I sent you an email a couple of days ago, but I'll send another, just in case. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 12:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

You did but your email address no longer shows in wiki emails.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:38, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: Oh I see: very strange. In which case, my second email is no good either. Just sent a third. Vanamonde (talk) 12:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

	Wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018!
	A very Happy, Glorious, Prosperous Christmas and New Year! God bless!  — Adityavagarwal (talk) 17:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, Adityavagarwal, and I wish you the same. Vanamonde (talk) 13:16, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to all!

	We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018!
	Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:18, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, Ssven2, and the same to you. Vanamonde (talk) 16:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News

Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News Hello copy editors! Welcome to the December 2017 GOCE newsletter, which contains nine months(!) of updates. The Guild has been busy and successful; your diligent efforts in 2017 has brought the backlog of articles requiring copy edit to below 1,000 articles for the first time. Thanks to all editors who have contributed their time and energy to help make this happen. >>> Sign up for the January Drive! <<< >>> Participate in the Coordinator Elections! <<< Our copy-editing drives (month-long backlog-reduction drives held in odd-numbered months) and blitzes (week-long themed editing in even-numbered months) have been very successful this year. March drive: We set out to remove April, May, and June 2016 from our backlog and all February 2017 Requests (a total of 304 articles). By the end of the month, all but 22 of these articles were cleared. Officially, of the 28 who signed up, 22 editors recorded 257 copy edits (439,952 words). (These numbers do not always make sense when you compare them to the overall reduction in the backlog, because not all editors record every copy edit on the drive page.) April blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 16 through 22 April; the theme was Requests. Of the 15 who signed up, 9 editors completed 43 articles (81,822 words). May drive: The goals were to remove July, August, and September 2016 from the backlog and to complete all March 2017 Requests (a total of 300 articles). By the end of the month, we had reduced our overall backlog to an all-time low of 1,388 articles. Of the 28 who signed up, 17 editors completed 187 articles (321,810 words). June blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 18 through 24 June; the theme was Requests. Of the 16 who signed up, 9 editors completed 28 copy edits (117,089 words). 2017 Coordinator elections: In June, coordinators for the second half of 2017 were elected. Jonesey95 moved back into the lead coordinator position, with Miniapolis stepping down to remain as coordinator; Tdslk and Corinne returned as coordinators, and Keira1996 rejoined after an extended absence. Thanks to all who participated! July drive: We set out to remove August, September, October, and November 2016 from the backlog and to complete all May and June 2017 Requests (a total of 242 articles). The drive was an enormous success, and the target was nearly achieved within three weeks, so that December 2016 was added to the "old articles" list used as a goal for the drive. By the end of the month, only three articles from 2016 remained, and for the second drive in a row, the backlog was reduced to a new all-time low, this time to 1,363 articles. Of the 33 who signed up, 21 editors completed 337 articles (556,482 words). August blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 20 through 26 August; the theme was biographical articles tagged for copy editing for more than six months (47 articles). Of the 13 who signed up, 11 editors completed 38 copy edits (42,589 words). September drive: The goals were to remove January, February, and March 2017 from the backlog and to complete all August 2017 Requests (a total of 338 articles). Of the 19 who signed up, 14 editors completed 121 copy edits (267,227 words). October blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 22 through 28 October; the theme was Requests. Of the 14 who signed up, 8 editors completed 20 articles (55,642 words). November drive: We set out again to remove January, February, and March 2017 from the backlog and to complete all October 2017 Requests (a total of 207 articles). By the end of the month, these goals were reached and the backlog shrank to its lowest total ever, 997 articles, the first time it had fallen under one thousand (click on the graph above to see this amazing feat in graphical form). It was also the first time that the oldest copy-edit tag was less than eight months old. Of the 25 who signed up, 16 editors completed 159 articles (285,929 words). 2018 Coordinator elections: Voting is open for the election of coordinators for the first half of 2018. Please visit the election page to vote between now and December 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Thanks for participating! Housekeeping note: We do not send a newsletter before (or after) every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add the GOCE's message box to your watchlist. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Miniapolis, Corinne, Tdslk, and Keira1996. >>> Sign up for the January Drive! <<< >>> Participate in the Coordinator Elections! <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:National Rifle Association

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	List of Presidents of India has been promoted to a featured list.This would not have been possible without your guidance and critical comments.Thank You and Merry Christmas(Happy New Year also)  — comment added by Force Radical (talk • contribs) 04:00, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, Force Radical, that is very kind of you. Vanamonde (talk) 13:07, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Howl's Moving Castle

Hello there.

Strange how this page isn't fine at all, but other movies (including the other Studio Ghibli movies) that have a long production section are fine. That is the reason why I keep edit warring your revision. Luigitehplumber (talk) 13:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

I am asking you once again to stop edit-warring, and join the discussion on the talk page, which I have started but you have ignored. You need to follow WP:BRD, and having been reverted multiple times, you need to obtain consensus on the talk page. Vanamonde (talk) 05:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

As long as you give me an answer to the question, I’ll leave the page alone. This answer is just an edit warring warning. Luigitehplumber (talk) 09:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

I am very intentionally not giving you an answer here. The place for this discussion is the talk page of the article, where I have provided my reasons. Why do you seem unable to enter a discussion there? Vanamonde (talk) 11:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

I don't know. I am just confused about why all the companies that worked on this movie cannot be listed on this article, yet other Studio Ghibli films and many other movies can still have them in. That talk page post was no help at all for me. Luigitehplumber (talk) 12:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Why do you insist on discussing this here, when I have told you, about six times, that the appropriate place is the talk page? Vanamonde (talk) 12:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Okay Okay. Luigitehplumber (talk) 14:09, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Hey

Who are you? Why are u leaving me messages? Logical weapon (talk) 18:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Don't you know you're saying this to an admin? I've looked at your edits and you appear to be a rude vandal. You'll see what he says.

Luigitehplumber (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jerusalem

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jerusalem. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Chris Reibel

The original reporter's reason was a mess, I completely agree (this was my talk page warning to the user) and I'm surprised the report remained up long after the user ended their vandalism. Though later CR continued again and got a 31h block, so it's all null at this point. Nate • (chatter) 17:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

@Mrschimpf: I'm glad this user didn't cause too much further trouble. Please do realize, though, that even unsourced content is not necessarily vandalism. A user may upload and use an incorrect logo in perfectly good faith; and it is stuff like that which makes such a report less likely to be actioned. I know that if I had had less time, I would have let it go; because it was complicated more than it should have been. Just warn folks for adding unsourced content. We have twinkle templates for that. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 17:39, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Exactly, I was trying to salvage the report and AGF but Mvcg seems to have a hair-trigger about vandalism, but since I'm not an admin I really can't remove their report and can only augment what I'm seeing. I would have just continued the manual talk warnings myself before an AIV report. Nate • (chatter) 17:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).

Administrator changes

Muboshgu

Anetode • Laser brain • Worm That Turned

None

Bureaucrat changes

Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the administrator policy should be amended to require disclosure of paid editing activity at WP:RFA and to prohibit the use of administrative tools as part of paid editing activity, with certain exceptions.

Technical news

• The 2017 Community Wishlist Survey results have been posted. The Community Tech team will investigate and address the top ten results.
• The Anti-Harassment Tools team is inviting comments on new blocking tools and improvements to existing blocking tools for development in early 2018. Feedback can be left on the discussion page or by email.

Arbitration

• Following the results of the 2017 election, the following editors have been (re)appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Alex Shih, BU Rob13, Callanecc, KrakatoaKatie, Opabinia regalis, Premeditated Chaos, RickinBaltimore, Worm That Turned.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Russian presidential election, 2018

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian presidential election, 2018. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Request

Vanamonde, would you mind rephrasing your comment at AE? Apparently the way you have phrased it made it sound like I intentionally moved your section from the section for uninvolved administrator to the section for involved parties, which wasn't the case ([1]). All I did was replace the (username) with your username in the section header ([2]). It's currently being misunderstood by some editors, so I would appreciate if you could do that for me. Thanks again, Alex Shih (talk) 10:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

@Alex Shih: Huh, I really didn't give it any thought. So amended; but where is this extremely silly misunderstanding happening? Vanamonde (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Arbcom mailing list. It's all good now, thanks! Alex Shih (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

The venue.....Oh! let's leave....Winged Blades^Godric 11:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mexico–United States border

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mexico–United States border. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Back again Comment

Happy to see you return, Could you take a look over List of Presidents of India to check if it meets the FL criteria. I have made some gnome like edits today and feel that it may be okay for FL. Best wishes for your renewed admin term-

To ping me add {{ping|Force Radical}} OR [[User:Force Radical]]

06:21, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

@Force Radical: I'm not particularly well-versed with FL criteria: I've never taken an article through the FLC. That said, this generally looks very solid. There are a few issues that should probably be addressed. There's a few grammatical points in the lead: I'll try to fix these later today or tomorrow. There are some unsourced bits in the "Notes" section of the table. The map you use is the Indian government map of the country, which Wikipedia generally avoids: it should use the de facto map, depicting Kashmir in the manner in which the territories are actually administered. The first Dalit President and the first Muslim president are probably worth mentioning in the lead, though that's more a matter of judgement. We should absolutely not be conflating the BJP and Janata Party candidates. They were distinct parties with distinct agendas. It is true that a faction of the JP later became the BJP, but that faction was previously the Jana Sangh: the Janata Party was a coalition, with many members, including INC factions. I also do not see why acting presidents should not have party affiliation colors, even if they are independents. Finally, I wonder if we could use colors that are easier on the eyes; the blue, in particular, is very harsh. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 07:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

I have sourced the unsourced statements, made the Colors neutral and added a pie chart .The picture of the India map is not replaceable as there exists no other survey on those lines. Also acting president is a person who becomes president in the absence of the actual Since he does not participate in elections I have decided against including their party Colors. I also have seperated the Janta Party and BJP. Please take a look at it -

To ping me add {{ping|Force Radical}} OR [[User:Force Radical]]

11:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

@Force Radical: The sourcing changes look good. In general you could afford to trim the bios a little bit, though that's more a matter of preference. There's also some slightly undue weight in Kalam's bio; it's a lot more like journalese than the others. Finally, the map really is going to be a sticking point. It shouldn't be that difficult; the data are all there in the current image, all you have to do is create a new one with the outline adjusted. If you're uncomfortable working with images, as I am, there are folks who can help. Vanamonde (talk) 16:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Map has been done (Maproom did it for me since Snapseed and Adobe Photoshop Express failed me).I hope it is up to the FLC.-To ping me add {{ping|Force Radical}} OR [[User:Force Radical]] 11:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

It's in decent shape: nothing stands out to me at the moment, but I'm no expert on FLC, I haven't done much work with lists. Give it a shot, I'd say. Vanamonde (talk) 12:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

 Done here (Sorry for being late at posting this )-To ping me add {{ping|Force Radical}} OR [[User:Force Radical]] 10:32, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Could you take a look over this and give pointers on developing it to GA class — comment added by Force Radical (talk • contribs) 04:33, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

(talk page watcher)@Force Radical:I had contributed to the article previously and this looks a very interesting proposal.If you wish, I can chime in.Winged Blades ^Godric 04:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Winged Blades of Godric-Sure, the more heads the better- — comment added by Force Radical (talk • contribs) 04:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

@Force Radical: It's an interesting topic. I'm a bit busy at the moment, though, and am likely to be away for a few days. I'll try to get to it after that. Vanamonde (talk) 09:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Just a gentle reminder in case you've forgotten — comment added by Force Radical (talk • contribs) 05:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Just noting that I have nominated Narada sting operation for GA (under the Politics and Government section) since I realised that the wait for a review can last for ever.@Vanamonde93 Please provide thoughts as to how we can prepare the article for the review.Winged Blades of Godric-I may be unavailable for some time in late Feb due to the exams.Ill list you as a co-nom so that you can address any issues if the review takes place during that time — Force Radical ( Talk • Contribs ) 07:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

@Force Radical: Sure. I'll leave some general comments now (I'm pressed for time) and will try to provide more detailed comments later. Vanamonde (talk) 13:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Minor alert

Hello. I was a bit disconcerted to see this account get created just now, and wanted to make sure you were aware. I nearly reported it but it hasn't edited yet ... Hope this helps, best wishes DBaK (talk) 18:06, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

DBaK yes, that's a bit concerning, thanks for letting me know. Vanamonde (talk) 13:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	I appreciate your contributions regarding my topic ban as well as your thoughts on Arbitration Enforcement. --MONGO 13:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, MONGO. While I was not a fan of your commentary, I do respect your willingness to admit a mistake and move on constructively. Vanamonde (talk) 13:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

G5

I went ahead and G5'd 1996 Dausa blast given that similar actions on another article led to a topic ban from the area for the editor who was trying to take responsibility for the edit. I don't believe that was the case at the time that I declined it, or else I wouldn't have done so. I think that changes the circumstances, and is enough to justify a G5. Thanks for the ping. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: Thanks. My tag was based on long experience with the nonsense churned out on South Asian topics by sockfarms, but I understand your reasoning, and I do appreciate that CSD requires a very cautious approach. Cheers, Vanamonde (talk) 14:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, I respect that, and it makes sense. I'll do the same with UPE farms when someone who isn't familiar with the area declines a G5. I probably am over cautious in implementing G5 deletions myself, because I fall on the more liberal side when it comes to tagging. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Roy Moore

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Roy Moore. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Hey Vanamonde93, I needed some help. Ever since the last discussion the same editor(s) have not let a single edit stick. They have been reverting every single edit that is made to the page, with underwhelming summaries. Is there any way one can reach consensus here? VedantTalk 14:38, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Numerounovedant: I've noticed there's been a bit of a kerfuffle, but I've been busy: I'm still sort of on break, my activity over the last week notwithstanding. I'll try to take a look. Vanamonde (talk) 14:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, there is very little that i think is needed to sort of complete the lead. Mostly done in my last revision. VedantTalk 15:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Ummm

See Wikipedia:Recent_additions. I got notified Macrocybe crassa was on the mainpage..... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

@Casliber: My mistake. I failed to realize that the page I was looking at had not been refreshed for a few hours. Fixed. Vanamonde (talk) 14:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

No problem. Being astute is important so keep it up ;) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:28, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 03:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)

Greetings,

It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Chances

Since I cannot make my mind up, what are the chances of Sukhabodhananda at an AfD?Winged Blades^Godric 17:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

After a quick search, I don't think he is notable, though he gets a lot of news hits for being a blogger for a mainstream newspaper or two. The sentence in the article does not confer notability in my view. Honestly I'd have tagged it for CSD#G11 before the cleanup, since the major contributors have an obvious COI (I'd warn them, btw, if you haven't already). As it stands now, the page is borderline: it could go either way at AfD. If you do send it there, include a detailed analysis of the sources that at a cursory glance might confer notability (but do not actually, as many are written by him). Vanamonde (talk) 14:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks:)Winged Blades^Godric 16:55, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Turkey

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Turkey. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

• News and notes: Communication is key

• In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media

• Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics

• Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count

• Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers

• Humour: Why don't we have an article about _________?

• Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018

• Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

TFAR

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Miriam Makeba --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Undiscussed page move

Hi, any chance of reverting this? I can't do it but the move is undiscussed and, as the article makes clear, there are numerous spellings of his name. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 09:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@Sitush:- Done to revert an undiscussed move which has been challenged.Winged Blades^Godric 12:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Godric: apologies, Sitush, I was offline. Let me know if anything further is required. Vanamonde (talk) 14:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foreign policy of the Donald Trump administration

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foreign policy of the Donald Trump administration. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

ITN: 2018 U.S Government shutdown

Thanks. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

mail

Hello, Vanamonde93. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

-AsceticRosé 15:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alternative for Germany

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alternative for Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Akhil_Bharatiya_Vidyarthi_Parishad

ABVP has a record of its office bearers since 1949 and that has been shared in the more presentable table, I am amazed why that is deleted but a similar table of Congress the opposition party is kept untouched. It's partiality on part of the some editors ~ashishsainram

Ashishsainram, what are you getting at? There's no table of Congress Presidents, let alone all office bearers. There's a list of BJP Presidents, but it exists as a separate article. The page about the Congress youth wing, the NSUI, doesn't have a list of office bearers either. I cannot see what "partiality" you are referring to. Furthermore, the "list of office bearers" is quite superfluous; anything other than a list of Presidents is definitely superfluous. Vanamonde (talk) 11:31, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikicup

Writing my message on my talk page here in case you did not receive my ping. I think the bot only added the bonus points for the article, not for the DYK (5 bonus points, I believe) and its creation back in 2004. Do kindly verify it. Thank you.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 09:41, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

@Ssven2: I'll take a look. Vanamonde (talk) 10:41, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

@Ssven2: The reason you didn't receive DYK points is simply because you didn't submit the DYK, but more importantly because you wouldn't be eligible for those anyway; that DYK ran in 2004 and you were not responsible for putting it there. To receive DYK points, you would have to nominate an article for DYK during this competition. Vanamonde (talk) 11:04, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Oh I see. I'm new to the Wikicup, its my first time. So, still getting the hang of things.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 16:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

No worries. Let me know if you have further questions. Vanamonde (talk) 16:44, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Will do so if any. Thanks.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 06:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blue Lives Matter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blue Lives Matter. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Image help

Could you please take a look at this FAC and please help me out with the fixing the points raised in the image review(Like which template should be added to the images, how the FUR(I don't know what is FUR) should be expanded as I have no idea how to deal with images).Thanks — FR™ 03:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

@Force Radical: I'll take a look, but I'm afraid I have a lot of trouble with images too. FUR is "Free Use Rationale"; essentially "Here's why can we use this image on Wikipedia". And fair warning, you're going to have trouble with that, because a lot of folks who upload images outside the Anglosphere do not have the know-how to do so with a Wikipedia-compatible license. Vanamonde (talk) 15:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)