User talk:VastsugarOrsten

Are you the original "Vastsugar"?

I will give this question if the other "Vastsugar*****" accounts are yours too. (No lying) (Not spam) 2001:1308:2695:7300:7419:83DB:F7B8:A41D (talk) 20:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

@2001:1308:2695:7300:7419:83DB:F7B8:A41D No prob but I have problems with account management because of cookie policy so I might not be able to sign in to those VastsugarOrsten (talk) 08:53, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

that's why I have so many accounts VastsugarOrsten (talk) 10:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Mystery solved! The solution is to make wikipedia recognize that you signed in and save your passwords. (No sockpuppetry, Ok) 2001:1308:2695:7300:28F9:8297:D35A:7CF8 (talk) 23:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

@2001:1308:2695:7300:28F9:8297:D35A:7CF8 Why sockpuppetry,

I'm actually just trying to contribute to the wiki as much as I can. If needed u can see my edits on silicaea, eumetazoa, porifera and more. My device has some problems with cookies and I have already made the wiki recognize my passwords but to no avail I still can't log in to my older accounts VastsugarOrsten (talk) 09:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Make sure to set your cookies to “default” and allow all cookies, so if you still get problems, contact support/feedback or check your security for any possible problems. 2001:1308:271B:CC00:AC81:16EE:4A17:E85E (talk) 14:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

@2001:1308:2695:7300:28F9:8297:D35A:7CF8

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:VastSugar per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VastSugar. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 16:16, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

@Izno

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VastsugarOrsten (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I'm actually just trying to contribute to the wiki as much as I can. If needed u can see my edits on silicaea, eumetazoa, porifera and more. My device has some problems with cookies and I have already made the wiki recognize my passwords but to no avail I still can't log in to my older accounts VastsugarOrsten (talk) 09:44, 23 April

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the stated reason for the block, sockpuppetry. You should do that from your original account. 331dot (talk) 23:04, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.