User talk:Vensatry/Archive 40
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Vensatry. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 35 | ← | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | → | Archive 45 |
It is at FAR because of you-know-who-and-why. Would you be willing to post comments there? I intend for the FAR to be closed after that. --Kailash29792 (talk) 03:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not sure as I my time here is rather limited at the moment. —Vensatry (talk) 18:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
<span style="white-space:nowrap;">—[[User:Vensatry|<font color = "indigo" >'''Vensatry'''</font>]] <sub> [[User talk:Vensatry|<font color = "Indigo" >'''(talk)'''</font>]] </sub></span>: —Vensatry (talk)
to
<span style="white-space:nowrap;">—[[User:Vensatry|<span style="color: indigo;" >'''Vensatry'''</span>]] <sub> [[User talk:Vensatry|<span style="color: Indigo;" >'''(talk)'''</span>]] </sub></span>: —Vensatry (talk)
—Anomalocaris (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done, thanks. —Vensatry (talk) 19:03, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas to all!
|
We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018! |
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:33, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
|
- @Ssven2: Many thanks and wish you the same —Vensatry (talk) 17:26, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Metropolitan Cities in India
Regarding your edit on Coimbatore, refer to the below link which lists the metropolitan cites of India. http://www.cpcb.nic.in/EnvironmetalPlanning/ground/Chapter3.pdf
Also, the census data classifies 1mn+ cities as metropolitan cities and 10mn+ cities as mega cities.
Your assumptions seems to be based on A-1 cities classified for HRA constitute metro cities. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 06:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Magentic Manifestations: The 2011 census report doesn't define what constitutes a "metropolitan area" let alone a "metropolis". The age-old document that you've quoted should strictly be taken into considerations for the purpose of census alone; it does not provide any basis for the city being eco/political/ cultural center as you claim. And FYI, "metropolis" is different from "metropolitan", at least in the Indian context - Coimbatore is noway comparable to metropolises like Tokyo, Shanghai, NYC, Karachi, Delhi, et al, Interestingly, the article itself claims: Coimbatore is the largest non-metro city for e-commerce in South India. It's you who are "pushing" POV, not me. —Vensatry (talk) 08:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Census defines the metropolitan area and a population for it. If you want to go by the official definition, then the stand is correct that the city is a metro. If you go by the wiki definition of a metropolis being an eco/political/ cultural center (which is by the way not my claim, it is what the article claims), as you have not laid any definition as to what is an eco/political/cultural center, the city is a eco/political/cultural center going by the contents (as the region's eco/political/cultural scenario is largely concentrated around the city). Coimbatore does not have to be Tokyo or Shanghai to qualify as this argument seems weird as you have a mindset that only those cities are metros (which seems more of your POV). You also selectively take sources for your advantage like the quote Coimbatore is the largest non-metro city for e-commerce in South India. whereas you choose to ignore the Govt of India defn. If your argument is of the date of the reference, it can also be said as outdated and Govt. continuous to maintain the same defn. till date. My opinion is that if there has been no discussion on this, this can benefit from taking others views as well.Magentic Manifestations (talk) 15:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Er, the "non-metro" claim is present in the article; I did not add it. Assuming that you were the one who added it, I was merely pointing out the inconsistency in your argument. —Vensatry (talk) 05:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Census defines the metropolitan area and a population for it. If you want to go by the official definition, then the stand is correct that the city is a metro. If you go by the wiki definition of a metropolis being an eco/political/ cultural center (which is by the way not my claim, it is what the article claims), as you have not laid any definition as to what is an eco/political/cultural center, the city is a eco/political/cultural center going by the contents (as the region's eco/political/cultural scenario is largely concentrated around the city). Coimbatore does not have to be Tokyo or Shanghai to qualify as this argument seems weird as you have a mindset that only those cities are metros (which seems more of your POV). You also selectively take sources for your advantage like the quote Coimbatore is the largest non-metro city for e-commerce in South India. whereas you choose to ignore the Govt of India defn. If your argument is of the date of the reference, it can also be said as outdated and Govt. continuous to maintain the same defn. till date. My opinion is that if there has been no discussion on this, this can benefit from taking others views as well.Magentic Manifestations (talk) 15:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Ugly
Can you please revisit the GAN? Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Sure but give me some time. —Vensatry (talk) 06:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2018
- News and notes: Communication is key
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
Happy Pongal, Makar Sankranti, Lohri and Bihu to you!
_Raw_sugar_jaggery_gud_Punjab_India.jpg)
May all your endeavours have a fruitful beginning and prosperous ending! — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks and wish you the same. :) —Vensatry (talk) 10:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Anbe Sivam has been promoted to FA! My first solo FA! — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 14:30, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Barbeque-Nation.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Barbeque-Nation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Precious five years!
 | |
| Five years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Thank you! —Vensatry (talk) 09:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
WikiCup 2018 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.
Our top scorers in round 1 were:
Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.- Ceranthor, Numerounovedant,
Carbrera, 
Farang Rak Tham and 
Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Prema Natakam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prema Natakam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prema Natakam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheSandDoctor Talk 04:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2018
- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
The Signpost: 26 April 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
- Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
- In the media: The rise of Wikipedia as a disinformation mop
- In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
- Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
- Community view: It's time we look past Women in Red to counter systemic bias
- Discussion report: The future of portals
- Arbitration report: No new cases, and one motion on administrative misconduct
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Military History
- Traffic report: A quiet place to wrestle with the articles of March
- Technology report: Coming soon: Books-to-PDF, interactive maps, rollback confirmation
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
WikiCup 2018 May newsletter
The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:
Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points- Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles- Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs
So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Vensatry. Hope you are doing well. It's a been a long time. I have a concern over this article's FA status. Since you were key to taking this to FA, I thought of dropping a message to you so that you could see what could be done to improve it rather than getting it stripped of its FA tag. — LeoFrank Talk 11:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- @LeoFrank: I'm doing good. Good to see you back! About the article, do you think it needs to be taken to WP:FAR? —Vensatry (talk) 07:23, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- I hate to see articles getting stripped of their FA status. I hope there is a way to address some of the issues in the article? Else, we may have to take it to FAR. — LeoFrank Talk 07:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Sure. In that case, can you list down the concerns on the talk page? We'll try to sort out the issues if they are trivial. —Vensatry (talk) 07:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- I hate to see articles getting stripped of their FA status. I hope there is a way to address some of the issues in the article? Else, we may have to take it to FAR. — LeoFrank Talk 07:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
Request for unblock
Vensatry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #21895 was submitted on Jun 23, 2018 08:24:59. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 08:24, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Vensatry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #21900 was submitted on Jun 23, 2018 19:14:18. This review is now closed.
Invitation to to review 89th Academy Awards for FLC
Vensatry As you have participated in previous FLC nomination for the Academy Awards ceremony, I would like to invite you for the review or comment on the current nomination of Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/89th Academy Awards/archive1. It has already been two months and all of the content is reviewed but it has only one support. So please take sometime out and review it so it could be moved to FLC status. Nauriya - Let's talk 22:57, 9 June 2018 (UTC).
- @Nauriya: Not sure I'll be able to take up reviews for a while as my time here is rather limited. Good luck with your nomination. —Vensatry (talk) 12:29, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for all your edits! I hope and pray you succeed greatly in your life. Surge_Elec (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC) |
- @Surge elec: Thank you! —Vensatry (talk) 12:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
WikiCup 2018 July newsletter
The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
- Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
- Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
- SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington
Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Please view your commons talk page
I have added a comment on the talk page of your commons please have a look. Ashwini Gadade (talk) 12:55, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
Hello. I am here to drink with you. Hope you are doing good. :D DBigXray 18:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC) |
Help with Tamil Sources
Hi, We need someone to look for Tamil sources Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Xavier's Higher Secondary School, Thoothukudi. Any help appreciated. --DBigXray 11:39, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
- From the editor: If only if
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
Disambiguation link notification for September 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of international cricket centuries by Joe Root, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2018
- From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
- In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
- Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Special report: Wikimania 2018
- Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
- Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
- Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
- Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
- From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
WikiCup 2018 September newsletter
The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:
- Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.- Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
- Other contestants who qualified for the final round were
Nova Crystallis, Iazyges, SounderBruce, 
Kosack and Ceranthor.
During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!
.svg)
Greetings!
You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.
This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.
Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!
If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Country Winners
- Diversity winner
- High quality contributors
- Gender-gap fillers
- Page improvers
- Wikidata Translators
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Vensatry, been a while. How are things going on with your good self? BTW, Kailash29792 has listed this article about a 1965 cult classic film in Tamil cinema for peer reviewing with the intention of preparing it for FAC and subsequently taking it to FA. As always, your constructive comments would be deeply appreciated. Also do have a look at his other FAC. Thank you. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:16, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Ssven2: Been a bit busy. :) I'm good! Will see if I can add something during the FAC. Cheers —Vensatry (talk) 15:18, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- One thing you could do is, point out any potentially non-RS in the PR, so I can remove it before going to FAC. I don't want a repeat of what happened during MM's first FAC. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:36, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Maya Krishna Rao
On 9 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maya Krishna Rao, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 2015, Maya Krishna Rao became the first artist to return the Sangeet Natak Akademi Award? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maya Krishna Rao. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Maya Krishna Rao), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
Vensatry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #23470 was submitted on Dec 04, 2018 17:03:53. This review is now closed.
Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Barbeque-Nation.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Barbeque-Nation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Vensatry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Unblock request
Vensatry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #23540 was submitted on Dec 10, 2018 19:10:34. This review is now closed.
IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.
Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked (through the use of CheckUser) periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).
I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Mz7 (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Mz7: Thank you! —Vensatry (talk) 16:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)